Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > California handguns
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California handguns Discuss your favorite California handgun technical and related questions here.

View Poll Results: What say you?
Six inch barrel (6") 61 38.36%
Four inch barrel (4") 103 64.78%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2010, 4:28 AM
Army GI's Avatar
Army GI Army GI is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 806.4616.0110
Posts: 4,188
iTrader: 23 / 96%
Default .357 Magnum revolver: 4 inch or 6 inch

There have been a handful of threads in the past asking everyone what barrel length they prefer, but I've never seen it in the form of a poll. I'd really like to see some quantitative data, so I'm starting my own.

It seems that the general reasons for choosing one over the other are as follows:

Four inch barrel: More versatile, lighter, less bulky, faster to draw, used as a general purpose sidearm.

Six inch barrel: Recoils less, used for "specialist" purposes such as hunting or target shooting at long range.


I'm not asking anyone's opinion on what I should buy. I just want to know what YOU like better and the the reason why you picked one over the other. I already own my Ruger GP 100 with 6" barrel, and I've held the 4" model in the gun shop. Honestly I love both, but the reason I went with the 6" was that I would eventually like to get into long range hand gun shooting...and I just liked the looks better.
__________________
Quote:
I purge the wicked. The impious madness must end. I shall be the instrument of Armageddon. It has gotten out of hand...
WTB: Lee-Enfield No I Mk III

Last edited by Army GI; 09-12-2010 at 4:30 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:12 AM
Miltiades's Avatar
Miltiades Miltiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,131
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default 6 inch fan

For my particular application I prefer the 6 inch (or longer) barrel, and have 4 of them in .357 caliber. The long barrel seems to facilitate accurate shooting. I don't really have a 4 incher, but do have snubby revolvers in .357, which weren't covered in your poll.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2010, 6:47 AM
NapaCountyShooter's Avatar
NapaCountyShooter NapaCountyShooter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vacaville, Norcal
Posts: 2,102
iTrader: 45 / 100%
Default

There's just something right about a six inch revolver chambered in a magnum cartridge.
__________________
Jonah
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2010, 7:20 AM
nn3453 nn3453 is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,258
iTrader: 102 / 100%
Default

6" is fine, but especially with a full lug, it is going to get tiring if you plan to shoot it for an extended period. The accuracy advantage that you lose with a 4" is not significant enough IMHO. I don't shoot bullseye but I
shoot plates/pins at 50yd and I've never felt under gunned with a 4".

I have both, but i prefer the 4". Actually I prefer the 5" barrel on my 627PC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:31 AM
den888's Avatar
den888 den888 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alameda County / East Bay
Posts: 10,414
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

6 inch, more sight radius and more accuracy. The 4 inch is too large to conceal anyway. For CCW, I would get a 2.5 inch .357 or an auto.

Just my thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:43 AM
jazman jazman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,935
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default

Really like my four inch wheel guns, but both are fine with me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:44 AM
GM4spd's Avatar
GM4spd GM4spd is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 4,474
iTrader: 89 / 100%
Default

6"---- if I need something shorter to conceal I'll use my Govt 45ACP(plus it's
flat). Pete
__________________
NRA LIFE (1974)
Since 1971 my Colt ARs(thru thousands of rds) some
FA--and no parts failures . No spares required.

I had a commission/USNR from 71-77 but never consider myself a Veteran.My Dad and his four
brothers/USMC /WW2,Korea,Vietnam. Their Father US Army WW1. They were Veterans.

9/11 was our worst day----11/9 our best day!
"Guns and religion TRUMP hope and change"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:46 AM
lazs lazs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 538
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I voted for four inch but really.. I think that for most folks a 5 inch is ideal. I think that unless you have perfect uncorrected vision that you can use a 4 or 5 inch sight radius a lot better than a longer one.

I don't shoot .357 much anymore but a .357 does have a lot of muzzle blast and sharp noise level.. I like to get the same or higher energy levels out of lower pressure 44 mag reloads and 4" works well in those guns.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:52 AM
WileyWilly's Avatar
WileyWilly WileyWilly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 465
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

For proper proportions, 4" for a "K" frame, 5" for a "N" frame pleases my eye. What you like is up to you.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:53 AM
John Browning's Avatar
John Browning John Browning is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Contra Costa County
Posts: 6,440
iTrader: 69 / 100%
Default

I'd be hard pressed to imagine a more versatile tool than a 4in Smith K frame. They carry light, point well, and are hard not to love. I still have my 4in 19-2, but the 6in 19-4 I had just didn't point as well or feel as good.

I have a love affair with my 1961 Smith 28-2, it eats everything and that big N Frame really soaks up the recoil. I want to find a 5in Model 27 at some point to go with it.

I just never liked the 6in barrel length and found it never draws as easily or points as naturally for me.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-12-2010, 9:00 AM
redcliff's Avatar
redcliff redcliff is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Shasta County
Posts: 5,171
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

For double action shooting I like the 4" models, for single action shooting I like the 6" models.

I find the 4" models the most versatile and wish some of my 6"-6.5" models were equipped with 4" barrels instead. It's much harder to find 4" barrel models on consignment in my experience, and also it's hard to find 4" barrels if you want to have an older Smith re-barrelled. I'm actually re-barrelling my 617 to 4" next week.

I pretty much only buy pre-lock Smith & Wesson revolvers as I feel you get a better built gun for less money than a new one. Don't worry Colt fans, I have those coverred already
__________________
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
"What we get away with isn't usually the same as what's good for us"
"An extended slide stop is the second most useless part you can put on a 1911"

"While Ruger DA revolvers may be built like a tank, they have the aesthetics of one also,
although I suppose there are a few tanks which I owe an apology to for that remark"

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-12-2010, 9:01 AM
trashman's Avatar
trashman trashman is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Great Valley
Posts: 3,787
iTrader: 34 / 100%
Default

6" with a caveat - make it an N-frame (i.e. Model 27 or 28) that has the tapered barrel with no underlug.

You get all the benefits of a longer barrel (longer sight radius, slightly bullet higher velocity, better pointability, higher mass to absorb recoil of hotter rounds) with only a slight change in the center of gravity of the gun.

With the tapered barrels even 8 3/8" 27's feel "muzzle light".

--Neill
__________________
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee126/northslope/2011__orig.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-12-2010, 9:22 AM
RedFord150 RedFord150 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Eastern LA County
Posts: 5,606
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

4" just feels right to me for the generic all around HD and 'take it to the range' gun.
I have never carried for a living or hunted with a handgun. Maybe if I did, my opinion would change.
__________________
God Did Not Create All Men Equal, Colonel Colt Did.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-12-2010, 9:54 AM
Legasat's Avatar
Legasat Legasat is offline
Intergalactic Member
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego North County
Posts: 4,156
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

4" barrel is plenty long enough to be accurate with (unless you are trying to shoot 100yds with it), and much easier to tote around.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
__________________
..

.........STGC(SW)


SAF Life Member


NRA Benefactor
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-12-2010, 10:18 AM
jdg30's Avatar
jdg30 jdg30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High Desert (San Bernardino County/So. Cal)
Posts: 872
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default

I prefer a 4" revolver. I've shot a S&W 686 and Ruger Security Six with 6" barrels and they were very accurate and easy to shoot but the longer barrels felt kind of heavy and I knew I would enjoy a 4" barrel more. I just started DROS on a new 4" Ruger GP100 and I can't wait to go shoot it.

I can see myself eventually getting a 6" revolver as well. There's just something about revolvers that would make me like them no matter what the barrel length is.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-12-2010, 10:21 AM
BillCA's Avatar
BillCA BillCA is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 3,832
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

I usually gravitate to the 4-inch guns or "duty guns" as I call them.
The Six-inchers are good for longer distance shooting. I figure with a 4-inch revolver, I can hit out to 25 yards well enough and I can, with a few seconds aim, make defensive hits at 50 yards with a .357. If I need any more distance than about 40 yards -- or more power than the .357 at that range -- I'll reach for the 12-gauge or a rifle.

Now, if I spent almost all my outdoors time in the mountains or on open range land, I might select a 6-inch (5-inch would be better IMO) for the extra range and sight radius.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-12-2010, 11:14 AM
six10 six10 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: No longer East Bay!
Posts: 465
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

4" feels better balanced to me
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-12-2010, 11:20 AM
shooting4life's Avatar
shooting4life shooting4life is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Lorenzo
Posts: 5,670
iTrader: 43 / 100%
Default

I am picking up at 6 inch 586. I think 5 inch balances the best on n frames and 4 inch on k frames. Have not made up my kind about the l frame though.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-12-2010, 11:53 AM
scarville's Avatar
scarville scarville is offline
Senior Member
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 2,306
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I voted for a 6". I can shoot 8" or less groups out to 120 yards with a 686 loaded with full powered 357's. It's too long to carry conveiently in a hip holster but a grizzy tough chest holster works well for me. If I were to carry one for "social" purposes I actually prefer the three inch barrel over the four inch.
__________________
Politicians and criminals are moral twins separated only by legal fiction.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-12-2010, 1:16 PM
rgs1975's Avatar
rgs1975 rgs1975 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Bay
Posts: 1,808
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

I'm partial to 3" myself.

__________________
It's too late, it's over.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-12-2010, 1:18 PM
ojisan's Avatar
ojisan ojisan is offline
Agent 86
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SFV
Posts: 9,637
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

^


3" and 5"...why do we always want that which is hard to find?

So I voted 4", but I sure regret selling my 6" back when.
__________________

Last edited by ojisan; 09-12-2010 at 1:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-12-2010, 1:23 PM
IrishPirate's Avatar
IrishPirate IrishPirate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Roseville, PRK
Posts: 6,402
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Army GI View Post
Four inch barrel: More versatile, lighter, less bulky, faster to draw, used as a general purpose sidearm.
this sums it up for me....





but i like 3" too......
__________________

Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame.
People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Governments, Governments Should Be Afraid Of Their People

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-12-2010, 1:51 PM
Rotten's Avatar
Rotten Rotten is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 110
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

My first handgun purchase was a 6" GP100 back in '85, the year they first came out. The 6" model did not have the full ejector shroud yet. That was introduced a couple years later and for that reason alone I almost bought a 4" barrel instead. The gun was defective from the factory. when fired from pre-cocked SA mode the gun would decock itself and push the trigger forwards rather than fire. I saved a lot of ammo that way. It took Ruger about four months to return it fixed and it worked flawlessly until stolen a year later.

My current wheel gun is an older N frame highway patrolman's model 27 S&W. I've had it about 17 years now. The Smith is MUCH higher quality workmanship with superior fit, finish and feel. I haven't forgiven myself for letting it get rust spots on it from condensation after sitting in a case all winter. It was perfect when I got it. I have ditched the Pachmyer grips in the photo in favor of Houge's. Plasticy feel, very unlike Houge rifle stocks but superior ergos than the Pachmyer presentation grips it came with.



Last edited by Rotten; 09-18-2010 at 8:54 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-12-2010, 1:58 PM
regalado1 regalado1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central CA
Posts: 359
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I have a Ruger GP100 6" in SS and I want a 4" and probably a 3" after that...why not.

You can't go wrong, get whichever is the best deal for you right now, then just keep adding.

For the record I really like my 6" Ruger. My next 2 will probably be Rugers also.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-12-2010, 4:19 PM
D.M.C.'s Avatar
D.M.C. D.M.C. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cerritos
Posts: 176
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

My thoughts are that the most perfect barrel lengths made for .38 and .357 are 3" and 5" respectively.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-12-2010, 4:46 PM
The King The King is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollister
Posts: 277
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I have owned my share of six inch barrel handguns but feel the 4" and 8 & 3/8" barrel smith & wessons are the ticket. 4 inch for defense, or three or five if you insist, and the long tom for hunting or long range can busting.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:06 PM
23 Blast's Avatar
23 Blast 23 Blast is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Orange County
Posts: 3,451
iTrader: 85 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nn3453 View Post
6" is fine, but especially with a full lug, it is going to get tiring if you plan to shoot it for an extended period. The accuracy advantage that you lose with a 4" is not significant enough IMHO. I don't shoot bullseye but I
shoot plates/pins at 50yd and I've never felt under gunned with a 4".

I have both, but i prefer the 4". Actually I prefer the 5" barrel on my 627PC
5" barrel FTW!

Seriously, like Goldilocks, it's neither too long nor too short. Wondering why Smith or Ruger don't offer 5" barrels as a compromise.
__________________
"Two dead?!? HOW?!?"
[sigh] "Bullets, mortar fire, heavy artillery salvos, terminal syphilis, bad luck --- the usual things, Captain."
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:08 PM
Kodemonkey's Avatar
Kodemonkey Kodemonkey is offline
Dates Hi-Profile Chicks
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,884
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I shoot IDPA with a 4" S&W 686P. I can't see trying to holster a 6" barrel effectively.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:18 PM
Turo's Avatar
Turo Turo is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SLO + Tulare
Posts: 5,063
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

6" barrel for a range gun, If I'm going to carry one concealed it'll be 2" barrel or shorter, I couldn't conceal a 4" barreled revolver very well. Besides, I can put all 6 rounds of .357 mag into a 12" plate at 100 yards, why get a shorter barrel?
__________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
-Thomas Jefferson

Check me out on YouTube! Shooting, Engineering, and Dogs. What's not to love?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:25 PM
bombadillo's Avatar
bombadillo bombadillo is offline
Former Humboldtian
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IDAHO and another proud member of the quitters club!
Posts: 14,045
iTrader: 79 / 100%
Default

I have a Colt Trooper .357 in 4" and I would prefer the 6" if I could get it. I only got this one because it was a $300 trade for it!! I would love to get a 6" Smith 686 and a 6" super redhawk cut down a little bit if it were ideal in .44 mag. Then I would have all my bases covered.
__________________
http://mossbergmvp.com/index.php?forum/
If you have any questions on the MVP platform, ask me here or on the "other" site. Same handle there.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:27 PM
Grumpyoldretiredcop's Avatar
Grumpyoldretiredcop Grumpyoldretiredcop is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Escape tunnel successful!
Posts: 5,833
iTrader: 117 / 100%
Default

When I first got hired at my former agency, I was issues a 6" S&W Model 66. It was a huge pain in the rear, that extra 2" was always in the way and it just wasn't that much more accurate. Additionally, I hate S&W revolver target triggers... the square edge bites into my trigger finger.

I eventually managed to get issued a 4" with the smooth "combat" trigger. That's my preference, except for special purpose pistols (concealed carry, target, etc.)
__________________
I'm retired. That's right, retired. I don't want to hear about the cop who stopped you today or how you didn't think you should get a ticket. That just makes me grumpy!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-12-2010, 5:43 PM
neuron neuron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 180
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I have a 3" S&W 686 Plus, which is a sweet .357 wheelgun. Easier for CCW than the 4" version. I also have a 6" Ruger (KGP161), which is not so CCW adept, but balistically is superior to any 4" or shorter revolver. The 6" barrel of the KGP 161 allows you to shoot 180-200 grain hardcast bullets from Buffalo Bore and Double Tap at near 44mag energies. That's what I carry with me in the woods when hunting, mainly as a backup SD trail gun.

A lot has been said about the relative virtues of the S&W and Ruger triggers. The newest Ruger GP100's are in my opinion as smooth as glass in DA and especially in SA mode, and the Ruger frame is as solid as the proverbial brick **** house.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-12-2010, 7:14 PM
faterikcartman's Avatar
faterikcartman faterikcartman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego area.
Posts: 1,119
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

4" or 6"? Yes, absolutely!
__________________
I am not your lawyer. I am not giving you or anyone else who reads my posts legal advice. I am making off-the-cuff comments that may or may not be accurate and are personal, not professional, opinion. If you think you need a lawyer please retain a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction. Your local bar association may be able to help if you need a referral.

Two Weeks!: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a...p/t-59936.html
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-12-2010, 7:18 PM
762cavalier's Avatar
762cavalier 762cavalier is offline
NRA Training Counselor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,626
iTrader: 50 / 100%
Default

well I like a 2" for concealability, a 4" for general plinking and a6" for longer distances. Just swap barrels when you want.




I have a Dan Wesson with a pistol pack. three guns in one three times the fun.
__________________
In any type of fight, & especially gun fights, there are no winners ..... just varying degrees of losers. The only fight you win is the one you never get into.


NRA Certified Instructor
Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, Home Firearms Safety,Muzzleloading, Personal Protection Series, Chief Range Safety Officer, Refuse to be a victim Regional counselor

Smog Inspections in the Sacramento area.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-12-2010, 7:36 PM
nemisis1400 nemisis1400 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So cal, Mission Hills
Posts: 1,296
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default

I voted both, just because you can never have enough wheelgun.
__________________
"Tactical is what you do, not what you buy" -longbow
"Assault is a type of behavior, not a type of hardware."-Alan Korwin
[Luke 22:36] International Standard Version (2008)
Then he said to them, "But now whoever has a wallet must take it along, and his traveling bag, too. And the one who has no sword must sell his coat and buy one."
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-12-2010, 7:44 PM
Army GI's Avatar
Army GI Army GI is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 806.4616.0110
Posts: 4,188
iTrader: 23 / 96%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nemisis1400 View Post
I voted both, just because you can never have enough wheelgun.
Indeed.

You guys know that you can vote for more than one option in his poll right?

Even though I currently own the 6" model, I plan to eventually get a 4" model later on down the road for plinking up to 25 yards.
__________________
Quote:
I purge the wicked. The impious madness must end. I shall be the instrument of Armageddon. It has gotten out of hand...
WTB: Lee-Enfield No I Mk III
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-12-2010, 8:31 PM
pyromensch's Avatar
pyromensch pyromensch is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: sacratomato
Posts: 6,843
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

i have had 3 357's all 6", the recoil is a non-issue, the blast, might be considered, and the draw time is also a consideration, but the looks, is a winner
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-17-2010, 1:13 PM
Army GI's Avatar
Army GI Army GI is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 806.4616.0110
Posts: 4,188
iTrader: 23 / 96%
Default

I guess the only solution is to get them all
__________________
Quote:
I purge the wicked. The impious madness must end. I shall be the instrument of Armageddon. It has gotten out of hand...
WTB: Lee-Enfield No I Mk III
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-17-2010, 1:28 PM
trob's Avatar
trob trob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,857
iTrader: 100 / 100%
Default

2.5" - 4" is perferred. The 6" barrel is too long for anything i would want to do with it, except the range. But i dont shoot a .357 at the range for target practice...thats expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-17-2010, 1:29 PM
trob's Avatar
trob trob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,857
iTrader: 100 / 100%
Default

2.5" - 4" is perferred. The 6" barrel is too long for anything i would want to do with it, except the range. But i dont shoot a .357 at the range for target practice...thats expensive.

here's my 4" 686ssr
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 3:48 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.