Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2009, 6:29 AM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,725
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default Is Gun Control linked to Violent Crime?

This was posted in another thread, but thought I'd start a new one.

This chart shows a comparison of Gun Laws & Violent Crime Stats for each state.

The Green line indicates # of violent crimes per 2,000,000 people. (higher number = higher crime rate)
Data collected here.

The Blue line indicates Brady Bunch state rating. (higher number = more gun control)
Data collected here.

BTW - I gave D.C. the same Brady score as CA, for comparison purposes.



Coincidence? I think not.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2009, 11:26 AM
vladbutsky's Avatar
vladbutsky vladbutsky is offline
In Memoriam
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 305
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

As much as I would like to agree with you on the correlation, there is none there...
The problem here is in source data that has numbers from large states like CA or TX and small ones like RI put together into a single table given same level of significance. Also "average" crime rate is not a very useful number for anything. What does it mean to have "average" crime rate between Oakland or Richmond and safe rich cities like Los Altos or Palo Alto? There is no meaning for any of this.
Brady's score has nothing to do with science either so there is no point to try playing statistics to get numbers that we like. This is not a good game because it can be played any way you want or Brady wants. So if you will try to give it some sort of "scientific legitimacy", keep in mind that other side will use it too..
__________________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2009, 11:38 AM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,725
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default

But, it is interesting to see that violent crime per capita is higher in those states that the Brady's deem as 'safer' due to having more restrictive gun laws.

Of course the data isn't perfect - it's coming from the Brady's and Wikipedia - not the most reliable sources - but nonetheless, it's still interesting...at least to me.

The fact the the data sets came from completely different sources, and the lines are nearly parallel tells me that there is some significance to it, and it's not just coincidence.

Last edited by Chris M; 12-29-2009 at 11:41 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2009, 11:42 AM
Hopi's Avatar
Hopi Hopi is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lassen County
Posts: 7,643
iTrader: 31 / 100%
Default

Without law genesis dates, it's hard to use that graph in a positive way. Couldn't it read that those areas with higher crime have more strict gun laws due to the efforts to reduce already high crime rates? Chicken and egg thing without the dates.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post

Soon it will be clearly immoral to routinely violate the bill of rights like the California courts so enjoy today.

-Gene
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2009, 11:58 AM
Rusty_Rebar Rusty_Rebar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 261
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I think someone could also argue that the reason there are so many gun laws in the higher crime rate states, is because of the crime rates.

So is it that the crime rate is so high in California because of the gun laws, or are there all these gun laws in California because of the crime rates?

There is really no good information on a coloration between tough gun laws and crime rates. It is apparently a difficult thing to normalize the data with so many factors involved.

Are the Police doing something different in how they investigate?

Are there less murders because the medical technology is keeping more people alive now?

Are the gun laws working?

Does the diversity of California lead to more gun crimes then say, North Dakota?

Maybe the bad guys would rather steal your stuff in sunny Los Angeles, then snowy Fargo?

Who knows? But I don't think abridging a constitutional right to run an experiment is really a great idea.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:08 PM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,725
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default

OK, I stand corrected. I wasn't thinking about the dates that the laws were put into place, and whether crime increased/decreased due to those laws. My bad.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:18 PM
madmike's Avatar
madmike madmike is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 460
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I think what the chart shows is that the Brady scores are the cause of all crime, and they should be banned by name...

-madmike.
__________________
-madmike.

I would like to say something profound here...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:57 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
No, I am not a Moderator!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,491
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

This may show that places with higher crime rates tend to be more open to vilifying gun ownership for whatever causes.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2009, 8:19 PM
LarryC's Avatar
LarryC LarryC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Riverside
Posts: 19
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default Good Analysis - As far as it goes

Chris M - I think your analysis is good for discussion, especially among the unconverted. When I talk with my co-workers this would be an ideal topic; not because it answers every nuance of the relationship between firearms, crime and gun control, but because it casts the argument in a way that can be easily communicated and discussed over lunch (which is the length of time I have to make my arguments).

No, it will not stand up to publication standards of peer reviewed academic journals. However I would argue that half of the laws passed in this county use less evidence to support their passage than you provided.

Don't let the criticisms of other posters, no matter how appropriate, discourage you from pursuing this line of thinking. Keep building on your ideas using the observations from the responses to your post. I like your thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-31-2009, 4:52 PM
navyinrwanda's Avatar
navyinrwanda navyinrwanda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 579
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris M View Post


Would anyone know the source of the violent crime data in this chart? Or who produced this chart?

I'm trying to reproduce the results, and am having a hard time duplicating them with the data from the referenced Wikipedia entry.

Thanks very much.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-31-2009, 5:05 PM
aileron's Avatar
aileron aileron is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: PRK
Posts: 3,250
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopi View Post
Couldn't it read that those areas with higher crime have more strict gun laws due to the efforts to reduce already high crime rates? Chicken and egg thing without the dates.
This is along the lines of what I saw from it when looking at it....that it shows is high crime areas have lots of anti-gun laws.
__________________
Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-31-2009, 6:25 PM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,725
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyinrwanda View Post
Would anyone know the source of the violent crime data in this chart? Or who produced this chart?

I'm trying to reproduce the results, and am having a hard time duplicating them with the data from the referenced Wikipedia entry.

Thanks very much.
I made the chart, and now that I'm double-checking it, it looks like something must have been seriously off in excel. I don't have access to the file right now, but when I do, I'll see what went wrong.

Basically, I was trying to adjust the ratio, in order make the numbers in the wiki more level with the numbers in the Brady scores.

For instance 500 violent crimes per 100,000 = 50 crimes per 10,000. The Brady's scoring system is 0-100...I wanted to adjust the ratio so that the majority of the crime data fell within that range.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-04-2010, 12:30 AM
RideIcon's Avatar
RideIcon RideIcon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Redding Cali
Posts: 1,505
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post
This may show that places with higher crime rates tend to be more open to vilifying gun ownership for whatever causes.

-Gene
I was thinking the same thing.

But stating that wouldn't be using their tactics against them.
__________________
Possession of high capacity magazine is NOT illegal.
CAL. PEN. CODE 12020
If you search and cannot find a thread about it, search again using This Search
Gun Facts PDF
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-05-2010, 8:17 AM
racer98765 racer98765 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 13
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I took the FBI's violent crime numbers for years 1999-2008 and the brady campaign's state ratings and was unable to reproduce his original graph. But with all the data at hand wanted to see what I could take from it. Going forward with the thought train that if gun legislation did work then a state with a high rating should have a low violent crime rate. So if you took the difference and the results was negative that would show that increased gun regulation has a corresponding lower violent crime rate. If it is positive then it shows that additional gun legislation does not lower the violent crime rate. You average all the differences to find the overall trend for the nation.

The algorithm is such:

State Violent Crime Rate per 100,000 = (State's Total Violent Crime Incidents x 100,000)/State's Population.

Normalize both the State Violent Crime Rates and brady campaign state ratings: Normalized Data = (Data-Min(Data))/(Max(Data)-Min(Data))
Now both sets of data range from 0 to 1 so you can do a direct comparsion, i.e. apples to apples.

Difference = Normalized State Violent Crime Rates - Normalized brady campaign state ratings

If (Difference)<0 then gun legislation does lower the violent crime rate

If (Difference)>0 then gun legislation does NOT lower the violent crime rate.

To find the overall trend for the nation you do the arithmetic mean to compute the "average": Mean Differences = Sum(Differences)/50 [Number of States]

If (Mean Differences)<0 then the overall trend for the nation is that gun legislation does lower the violent crime rate.

If (Mean Differences)>0 then the overall trend for the nation is that gun legilsation does NOT lower the violent crime rate.

I computed graphs for all the years I could get data for, 1999-2008. And the overall trend for each year was positive therefore showing that additional gun legislation does NOT lower the violent crime rate.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg gunstatistics99.jpg (89.0 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics00.jpg (89.2 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics01.jpg (89.5 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics02.jpg (89.4 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics03.jpg (89.2 KB, 13 views)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-05-2010, 8:20 AM
racer98765 racer98765 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 13
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Graphs for years 2004-2008.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg gunstatistics04.jpg (88.7 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics05.jpg (89.1 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics06.jpg (89.1 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics07.jpg (88.5 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg gunstatistics08.jpg (89.6 KB, 15 views)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-05-2010, 8:47 AM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris M View Post
I made the chart, and now that I'm double-checking it, it looks like something must have been seriously off in excel. I don't have access to the file right now, but when I do, I'll see what went wrong.

Basically, I was trying to adjust the ratio, in order make the numbers in the wiki more level with the numbers in the Brady scores.

For instance 500 violent crimes per 100,000 = 50 crimes per 10,000. The Brady's scoring system is 0-100...I wanted to adjust the ratio so that the majority of the crime data fell within that range.
You can just plot one set of data on the secondary axis which would require no data transformation.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-05-2010, 9:01 AM
timdps timdps is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,908
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Graphically, I think a double bar graph for each state would work better for the OPs table than a continuous line graph. There is no reason to link the data points from different states.

Nit has been picked...

Tim
__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require, that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others for essential, particularly for military supplies." - George Washington, 1790
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-05-2010, 9:13 AM
inbox485's Avatar
inbox485 inbox485 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 3,714
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

There is an article similar to this from one of the Gun Rights Examiners. The correlation is pretty solid. The more violence there is in a state, the higher the Brady bunch rates the state for the gun control that gave way to the violence.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-05-2010, 9:24 AM
Flopper's Avatar
Flopper Flopper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,285
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vladbutsky View Post
As much as I would like to agree with you on the correlation, there is none there...
Actually if the statistics are correct, there is by definition a correlation.

I think the word you were looking for was "causation."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-05-2010, 9:28 AM
IrishPirate's Avatar
IrishPirate IrishPirate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Roseville, PRK
Posts: 6,401
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

I think this says it all

__________________

Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame.
People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Governments, Governments Should Be Afraid Of Their People

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:27 AM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Same Data as OP arranged by Brady Campaign score (High to Low). D.C. is rated a 95 in this data set based on estimates of their scoring criteria. The Brady's do not score D.C. I don't need to do a statistical test to see that there is no correlation between Brady Campaign scores and violent crime rates.

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:12 AM
mtptwo mtptwo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 404
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I want to see population and median income overlaid on this graph.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:15 AM
BakerPD's Avatar
BakerPD BakerPD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 464
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERj3Q...&cc=1#t=22m48s
__________________
www.yaliberty.org

I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually
-James A. Baldwin
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:23 AM
ALSystems's Avatar
ALSystems ALSystems is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: On the Far Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,160
iTrader: 17 / 100%
Default

There are a lot of good stats with graphs here:

http://www.gunfacts.info/
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:29 AM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,735
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

I think a scatter plot of brady rating vs violent crime rate (omitting the states) would be more useful. Can somebody post a .csv of the data used in post 21?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:37 AM
timdps timdps is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,908
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Very nice graph- thank you.

Would not mind seeing the inverse graph: order the states by violent crime rate and then add the Brady data points.

tim

Quote:
Originally Posted by kap View Post
Same Data as OP arranged by Brady Campaign score (High to Low). D.C. is rated a 95 in this data set based on estimates of their scoring criteria. The Brady's do not score D.C. I don't need to do a statistical test to see that there is no correlation between Brady Campaign scores and violent crime rates.

__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require, that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others for essential, particularly for military supplies." - George Washington, 1790
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:40 AM
jdberger's Avatar
jdberger jdberger is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,912
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

I love Calgunners.....
__________________
Rest in Peace - Andrew Breitbart. A true student of Alinsky.

90% of winning is simply showing up.

"Let's not lose sight of how much we reduced our carbon footprint by telecommuting this protest." 383green


NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:58 AM
racer98765 racer98765 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 13
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtptwo View Post
I want to see population and median income overlaid on this graph.
Population is already normalized by using Violent Crime Rate instead of using Violent Crime Incidences. Since Violent Crime Rate per 100,000 is computed via:

Violent Crime Rate per 100,000 = State's Violent Crime Incidents * (100,000/State's Population).

This will therefore allow the different states to be compared allowing the large differences in each state's population. I.e. a Apples to Apples comparsion.

Median Income is not included in any FBI's datasets I've seen. Also you shouldn't use data outside collected the two datasets used because your not sure how the data was collected and if you can properly compare and contrast the different datasets. You can use outside data, but that then requires additional number crunching and that usually goes beyond my comfort zone of how much massaging of the data is allowed and the numbers to actually be true.

Last edited by racer98765; 03-05-2010 at 12:03 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-05-2010, 12:02 PM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtptwo View Post
I want to see population and median income overlaid on this graph.
Did that. I'll post it just for fun in a second. The real take home message is that Brady Scores have nothing to do with anything except how many gun laws on on the books.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-05-2010, 1:10 PM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtptwo View Post
I want to see population and median income overlaid on this graph.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-05-2010, 2:02 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,735
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

A scatter plot of brady (x) vs all the rest of that last plot (y) (correlate by state) would be awesome!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-05-2010, 2:21 PM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by curtisfong View Post
A scatter plot of brady (x) vs all the rest of that last plot (y) (correlate by state) would be awesome!
Here you go. Linear trend lines tell the story.

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-05-2010, 2:28 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,735
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

ROFL! It just doesn't get any better than that. Thanks kap!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-05-2010, 2:54 PM
jdberger's Avatar
jdberger jdberger is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,912
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Alrighty - explain it to someone who had to take Stats a couple times.....
__________________
Rest in Peace - Andrew Breitbart. A true student of Alinsky.

90% of winning is simply showing up.

"Let's not lose sight of how much we reduced our carbon footprint by telecommuting this protest." 383green


NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-05-2010, 4:14 PM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdberger View Post
Alrighty - explain it to someone who had to take Stats a couple times.....
Just look at the blue line. The blue line indicates the general trend of the data for Brady Score vs. Violent Crime. From this you can see that the lower the Brady Score (fewer gun laws) the lower the violent crime. Similarly, the higher the Brady Score (more gun laws) the higher the violent crime.

To be fair, the linear trendline is not a great fit for this data, but does give you a general idea of what is going on. If gun laws actually helped reduce violent crime you should see violent crime decrease as gun laws increase (i.e. the line would slant downward from left to right instead of upward). The take home message is that more gun laws (High Brady Score) do not correlate with a decrease in violent crime.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:39 PM
HondaMasterTech's Avatar
HondaMasterTech HondaMasterTech is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,338
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I believe the answer to the question in the thread title is; Yes, there is a link. More gun crontrol = more crime. Generally speaking.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:49 PM
five.five-six's Avatar
five.five-six five.five-six is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27,990
iTrader: 52 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post
This may show that places with higher crime rates tend to be more open to vilifying gun ownership for whatever causes.

-Gene

true, but does it not also anecdotally mitigate the contention that restricting guns lowers crime... and to be fair, our antagonists have used far more questionable examples to buttress their position

Quote:
Originally Posted by kap View Post
To be fair, the linear trendline is not a great fit for this data, but does give you a general idea of what is going on.
IMO, a graph that was arranged by Brady score, rather than alphabetically would be more convincing. even better would be a 3-d grph going back several years

Last edited by five.five-six; 03-05-2010 at 10:52 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-05-2010, 11:47 PM
kap's Avatar
kap kap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by five.five-six View Post
IMO, a graph that was arranged by Brady score, rather than alphabetically would be more convincing. even better would be a 3-d grph going back several years
I agree! All the graphs that I made are arranged by Brady Score.

Back data would be great, so would p-values. It's all a matter of time invested and what it would accomplish.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-06-2010, 7:11 AM
Anonymous Coward's Avatar
Anonymous Coward Anonymous Coward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 200
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I stumbled across this website last week and found this interesting:
http://www.statemaster.com/correlati...te-per-100-000

It shows the factors that correlate most with the firerarm deaths per capita. So between the factors they track the statistic about reading and writing levels correlates the most.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-06-2010, 8:14 AM
five.five-six's Avatar
five.five-six five.five-six is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27,990
iTrader: 52 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kap View Post
I agree! All the graphs that I made are arranged by Brady Score.

Back data would be great, so would p-values. It's all a matter of time invested and what it would accomplish.

no, you are missing th point... the high brady scores would be on the left (or right) and be descending (or ascending)


if you are going to use questionable data correlations to change world opinion, learn from the masters




back data, shmack data, just make up data that fits your conclusion, it's just as good
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 5:29 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.