Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated Centerfire rifles, carbines and other gas operated rifles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2005, 3:16 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Has anyone come up with a good method to mount optics on the Robinson M96 Bren configuration?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2005, 3:16 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Has anyone come up with a good method to mount optics on the Robinson M96 Bren configuration?

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2005, 7:08 PM
RRangel RRangel is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,161
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

That's one wacky looking rifle.

If that's yours I'm assuming you're not living in California or that's a permanently fixed magazine.

That's a tough question. Robinson would better be able to answer that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2005, 7:33 PM
1919_4_ME's Avatar
1919_4_ME 1919_4_ME is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,675
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default

The Bren configuration was never really designed for optics.It wouldnt look right either IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2005, 7:36 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I see you are not familiar with older military weapons or you would know about the Bren gun. The neat thing about the Robinson M96 is it can be reconfigured into different weapons. I have the following configurations:

• Rifle Configuration with 21" Barrel.
• Recon Carbine.
• Bren Gun (Top Feed).
• Heavy Fluted Carbine.

Unfortunately they never produced the belt fed version.

BTW, I do live in California and my Robinsons were registered as AW's in 2000. Here are some pics of my M96's in other configurations.



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2005, 7:44 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Unfortunately us old guys need a little assistance in the eye department. I would really like to mount an offset red dot sight.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2005, 7:47 PM
RRangel RRangel is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,161
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Very nice rifles. I only wish I had bought one before 2000. They remind me of a Stoner.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-23-2005, 8:49 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

The M96 is based on the Stoner system. The following is from Robinson's web site:

The M96 is based on the Stoner 63 Weapon System designed by Eugene Stoner and used by the U.S Navy Seals in Vietnam.* The Stoner 63's receiver, using a variety of modular components, could be configured as a rifle, carbine, a top fed light machine gun, a belt fed squad automatic weapon, or a vehicle mounted weapon.* The M96 has been designed with similar modularity in mind but has been simplified for easier maintenance.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-24-2005, 2:06 AM
50 Freak's Avatar
50 Freak 50 Freak is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,435
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

I recently had a chance to shoot a M96 (finally). Was impressed with it cosmetically and fit and finish wise. Can't say about the handling (as the guy who had it, had the pistol grip off). Accuracy with iron sights it was similar to my Para Fal.

But weight wise, it was a little heavier than my FAL, and it was 223, whereas my FAL was 308.

If I didn't have my AR or FAL grandfathered in, I would would buy the M96 in a heartbeat. A removable 30 rounder is a head better than a fixed 10 rounder.
__________________
I'm Rick James...Be-otch!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-24-2005, 8:37 AM
Turbinator's Avatar
Turbinator Turbinator is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,262
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Admin:
Very nice rifles. I only wish I had bought one before 2000. They remind me of a Stoner. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes, very nice. I am envious! Rifle envy?

Turby
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-24-2005, 9:28 AM
fastmanusa fastmanusa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 38
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

[QUOTE]

If that's yours I'm assuming you're not living in California or that's a permanently fixed magazine.

[\QUOTE]
That sounds like kind of a personal question. How about it's none of your business.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-24-2005, 12:20 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

50 Freak

All the M96's sold into CA after 2000 we not permitted to have a pistol grip installed. I would imagine the handling would be awkward. When I ordered the green stock set for one of my M96's a few years back Robinson refused to send me a pistol grip. In order to get them to ship me one I had to provide Alex Robinson with a copy of my AW registration.

Regarding accuracy, I am satisfied. I shot the group below with Winchester 55 gr. (white box) at 100 yards.

BTW, a SAR-4800 (FAL) rifle in .308 is lighter than a SAR-4800 (FAL) carbine in .223. Also, a Stoner SR-25 Standard in .308. is lighter than a Colt HBAR in .223 The difference is the .308 is a bigger bore than .223 which means a lighter barrel.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-24-2005, 12:24 PM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Fastmanusa

Not to worry. I registered my M96's with the CA DOJ in 2000.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-24-2005, 1:08 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
iTrader: / %
Default

Customer service at RobArms is unquestionably great IMO, however, they are a bit paranoid of certain things (especially that of pistol grips falling into the "wrong" hands). It is their policy now to NOT answer any (even the most inane) questions about their firearms without you providing a comprehensive list of personal info. and that of your rifle(s). I can't knock their products, or their service, yet encouraging more Orwellian nonsense is a bit of a turn-off to me.

In regards to the Bren config. :
I wish RA had concentrated on the caliber conversions (one of the main reasons I bought mine) they promised for the M96 rather than this goofy set-up.

Oh well...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-25-2005, 3:29 PM
RRangel RRangel is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,161
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I wonder if Lockyer and the CA DOJ will at some point try and pull that confiscation deal on buyers again? What happens when we get another Attorney General?

I really like this rifle only the no pistol grip wouldn't make it any fun. Probably not worth the $1000+ hassle.

Has anyone seen dealers stocking these?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-25-2005, 3:54 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
iTrader: / %
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Admin:

I really like this rifle only the no pistol grip wouldn't make it any fun. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Without the PG stud, I'd agree. It would be hard to fire it without that, but as it's sold for CA, it's not dificult to shoot sans the grip. However, it can be akward to charge the rifle and the handling sometimes feels clumsy (i.e. waaaayy too muzzle-heavy) without it. Other than that, it shoots like a dream.

Besides, IMO, it is the least "neutered" of it's kind - that being, rifles specifically created to fill the CA SB23 niche market. With an allen wrench, it can easily be returned to it's normal state in a normal state in a matter of seconds.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Probably not worth the $1000+ hassle. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Considering the options and their near equitable expense, I'd tend to disagree.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Has anyone seen dealers stocking these? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-26-2005, 10:05 AM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I agree, service at Robinson Arms is very good.

BTW, you are the first person I have heard call the top feed (Bren) configuration goofy. Especially considering all the different nations that used this configuration for decades against their enemies with such devastating effect.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-26-2005, 10:24 AM
C123K_LoadMaster's Avatar
C123K_LoadMaster C123K_LoadMaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 203
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I don't see the CA DOJ going down that path again. It was a very big embarrassment for them and Alex's attorney made sure they heard the message loud and clear.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 4:02 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.