Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2009, 6:01 AM
Lissauer's Avatar
Lissauer Lissauer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 464
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default It's just a piece of machinery

I like the way this guy writes.

Paul Markel touches on a subject that many in the industry would prefer to ignore: the schism between hunters and modern rifle enthusiasts.

"It's just a piece of machinery. They all look the same. There's no pride in craftsmanship." remarked a noted outdoor writer and famed hunter during a recent industry event. A second like-minded individual responded, "Sure they're fine for shooting varmints or prairie dogs, but this craze will come to an end soon." Naturally, they were discussing the Stoner-based self-loading rifle in its many forms.

For more than a decade I have listened as shooting sports "purists" have denigrated and apologized for the "evil" black rifle. Not so long ago I was standing in a gun shop when one of the regulars remarked that "I can see banning some kinds of gun, I mean what does anyone need one of those for anyway?" He gestured in disgust at a couple of semi-automatic carbines on the shelf.

Most of us have read the editorials in the outdoor sports magazines, this editor or that will belittle the black rifle "fad". At best they will concede that some people might find a use for one, but not I. By the end of the written sermon they have firmly emplaced themselves on the moral high ground bidding others to follow in their lofty steps.

I've been in the industry for two decades and have present during these gatherings of purists where the Stoner design is ridiculed and belittled. I've sat quietly as those present responded "Hear, hear" and "Good show old boy."

On the other hand, I have also attended innumerable training courses and events where those in attendance used their Stoner-based rifles. Not a single time during a meal break or post-shooting socializing did anyone in the group bring up the outdated and antiquated single-shot, falling block rifle. Never once did one of these folks disparage the $5000 over-under shotgun as a complete waste of money and resources. I cannot recall an instance where an AR-15 owner has told me that he resented those who stalked and killed antelope just for sport.

Nope, can't recall a single instance of that occurring. Conversely, I have lost count of the times I have been present in a group of sportsman and outdoor types and the subject of the self-loading, gas-operated rifle has come up. It seems to be a favorite pass time for upland game and big game hunters, trap and skeet shooters, and conservationist types to bash and belittle those that would purposely own and shoot the AR platform.

No, I am not painting all hunters and birders with a broad brush. Before you get your panties in a wad be honest with yourself. How many times have you kibitzed with your buddies at the trap range and heard someone reference Stoner rifles as "assault weapons"? When was the last time you attended a benefit for the conservation of ducks, pheasant, whitetail, elk, (insert game preservation society here) and someone at your table made a snide remark about "black rifles"? Be truthful, have you heard that guy spout off about how he can understand banning some kinds of gun? Did you say anything or just nod your head?

Folks, human beings have been having this argument since the dawn of mankind. Flintlock purists saw no sporting value in those new fangled percussion cap guns. U.S. Army troops were saddled with muzzle-loading muskets when cartridge firing, repeating rifles were available. Who would ever need to shoot that fast? Many argued.

At the turn of the century soldiers and peace officers carried single-action revolvers because the semi-automatic pistols couldn't be relied upon and were untested. While we are on the subject, how many purists who see no craftsmanship or pride of ownership in a Stoner rifle would say the same thing about the Model 1911A1 pistol and its myriad clones? That pistol started life as a mass produced, faceless piece of machinery.

Purists have a real problem with the "mad rush", as one outdoor writer described it, of Americans to purchase 100% made in the USA black rifles. Those same folks see no problem buying a Krieghoff, Perazzi, Benelli, or Beretta and sending the profits back to the Old Country.

What these well intentioned, often very intelligent, folks are afflicted with is the "Reasonable Disease". If we are only reasonable and meet the other side halfway then they will be reasonable too. I have a news flash for you purist, anti-Stoner folks. The other side doesn't like you either. They will happily step over your body to get to the rest of us.

We all want to be reasonable. Just think how wonderful our world would be John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington could have been more reasonable and met the British Monarchy halfway. Being reasonable has taken us the edge of the abyss in these United States. I dare say that the founding fathers would scarcely recognize what we have become.

The bedrock foundation of the Constitution, the document that was forged after our forefathers pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor, is at this moment being trampled. It has been used as a doormat for incoming congressmen, senators, and yes, even the current occupant of the Oval Office.

This did not happen overnight. We, the good citizens of the United States, have handed over our freedoms under the guise of being reasonable. We have been promised if we will only give a little that the enemies of freedom will be satisfied. They will not be satisfied. Their rotten guts are never full. Consumed by greed for power they take a bit more and a bit more. Can you placate a lion by letting him eat only your foot?

My friends, and we still can be friends, the question is not about whether the "black rifle" is good for the shooting sports industry. It is not whether the Stoner design has a place on the hunting field. The question is will we stand united to protect our freedoms from an ever encroaching enemy. Will we squabble with each other over aesthetics and operating systems or will we lock arms and say "No More!"?

Though it will pain your eyes to read and your ears to hear, the United States Constitution, at the moment the supreme law of the land, does not grant you a "right" to hunt, shooting sporting clays, compete in bull's eye matches or any sport. You hunt only as a privilege of the state. That privilege is not in any way guaranteed.

For those purists in the audience, those who look upon the Stoner design with disgust and distaste, I challenge you to take a moment to reflect. Wade past the emotion and prejudice you have harbored deep down. Be intellectually honest with yourself for a moment.

At this point in history we are in a more precarious position than we ever have been. Either we will unite and demand that our elected public servants adhere to the principles of our founding fathers and the U.S. Constitution or we will fall in the abyss of never ending government intrusion, regulation, and slavery to a system we neither understand nor recognize.

You see, the Stoner designed, gas-operated, self-loading rifle is more that just a machine. There is a definite pride of ownership, the pride that comes from the realization that you are a citizen not a servant. The lawful possession of the black rifle means that you are still a free man in a world where the free man is an endangered species.

Paul Markel © 2009
Finally, to our grand purists, look down from your moral high ground and see this. The black rifle is a living symbol. It is a symbol not of varmint hunting but of freedom. It is the black rifle that will preserve your privilege to practice the shooting sport of your choice. Embrace this self-loading, gas-operated machine. If the black rifle is lost your nation, all that you hold dear, and your freedom will surely follow.

Markel is a former United State Marine and Peace Officer. He is currently a full-time Small Arms and Tactics instructor for the U.S. Miltary. Mr. Markel has been writing for the outdoor/firearms world for two decades with hundreds of articles in print.
__________________
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.

With guns, we are 'citizens.'

Without them, we are 'subjects'.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2009, 6:32 AM
Mitch's Avatar
Mitch Mitch is offline
Mostly Harmless
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno
Posts: 6,574
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

My word for hunters who would happily sell our civil rights down the river is "Zumbo."

Yeah, yeah, Zumbo reformed and all that, but only after his livelihood was threatened.

"Zumbo." Rolls nicely off the tongue.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cockedandglocked View Post
Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2009, 7:01 AM
yellowfin's Avatar
yellowfin yellowfin is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 8,371
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

It's a big problem in Pennsylvania, that much I know. They've got a HUGE number of hunters and NRA members and I've read and overheard LOTS of this. We're working on it in NYS but still have a long way to go. I'm told Connecticut also has a big problem of it.
__________________
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
Quote:
Originally Posted by indiandave View Post
In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:04 AM
CALPsidewinder's Avatar
CALPsidewinder CALPsidewinder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 82
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

There was a really good article in American Hunter recently regarding the "black guns" as hunting firearms and how it was the only rifle that was used by our armed forces that didn't get carried over to the hunting culture right away. The article remarked that most of our service men who were hunters and came back from Vietnam didn't want to use their AR for hunting because it brought back too many bad memories. I am glad there are a lot of companies out there and hunters trying to dispel the "evilness" of the so called black gun.
__________________
NRA Life Member

"no way as way...no limitation as limitation - Lee Jun Fan"

"Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." - Vegetius
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:19 AM
Mitch's Avatar
Mitch Mitch is offline
Mostly Harmless
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno
Posts: 6,574
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CALPsidewinder View Post
The article remarked that most of our service men who were hunters and came back from Vietnam didn't want to use their AR for hunting because it brought back too many bad memories.
I suppose state game laws outlawing the use of .223 for deer hunting or requiring shotguns had nothing to do with it?

WWI and WWII vets had a lot of bad memories too.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cockedandglocked View Post
Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:25 AM
Sheepdog1968's Avatar
Sheepdog1968 Sheepdog1968 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,874
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Semi autos IMO can be a more humane way to hunt as it offers a faster chance for a follow up shot. Beretta has a semi auto specifically designed for hunting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:32 AM
BigDogatPlay's Avatar
BigDogatPlay BigDogatPlay is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beautiful progressive Sonoma County
Posts: 7,362
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
My word for hunters who would happily sell our civil rights down the river is "Zumbo."
+1

You read my mind on that.

The hunters and sportsmen who don't see the need for EBRs and say it's okay to ban them need to realize that they (and we) are playing an all or nothing game. The only difference between going all in at the table and what we are doing is that the grabbers are willing to take the rights away incrementally. In their mind the end result is still the same.... hunters, sportsmen, collectors and just average shooters all leave the table with nothing.

The Zumbos of the discussion can't seem to grasp that.
__________________
-- Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun

Not a lawyer, just a former LEO proud to have served.

Quote:
Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. -- James Madison

Last edited by BigDogatPlay; 10-19-2009 at 8:36 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:34 AM
mmartin's Avatar
mmartin mmartin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 951
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

excellently written piece. to the point for sure.
megan
__________________
"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty." - John Adams
"To maintain the ascendancy of the Constitution over the lawmaking majority is the great and essential point on which the success of the system must depend;" - John C Calhoun
"If you don't have a gun, freedom of speech has no power." - Yoshimi Ishikawa
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:37 AM
SJgunguy24's Avatar
SJgunguy24 SJgunguy24 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern Mexico(San Jose) Where illegals have rights and citizens get screwed
Posts: 14,849
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

I've gotten into spirted conversations about this before. I asked one guy if a 240lb wild pig was charging would he want his 7mm mag, or an AK with a 10 round mag?

He kinda looked at me and said thats not a fair question. I asked him why,"well that pig could kill me".
"So having that quick follow up shot would good then?" I asked.


Crickets........

Restrictions on any firearms are a violation of our rights. And any way to devide us is a win for the anti's.
__________________
There are 3 kinds of people in this world.
The wise, learn from the mistakes of others.
The smart, learn from their own mistakes.
The others, well......they just never learn.

"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death!"
Patrick Henry.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2009, 9:44 AM
calixt0 calixt0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 546
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I wonder when we will regive our declaration of independence to our own "government" .

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Our government has consistently taken steps to hinder our rights (both stated in the declaration and in the bill of rights) . My life is not my own. My life is what my government will allow it to be, Liberty that is a joke, I'm only allowed to create what the government says is OK (through licensing and taxes) , I can only buy (medications, alcohols, drugs, cars, utilities, if I want to smoke or not wear my seat belt, or not wear a helmet) what the government has approved. Pursuit of happiness, not that I believe that happiness is promised but I can pursue it. what If owning and shooting Full automatic weapons is where my happiness lies? Why should I have to live in a certain state or be subject to ownership (by signing up and "serving" in our military to do so, please note that I'm thankful for those that serve the greater good, but don't feel a need to serve as our current military sees necessary ie total and complete domination by those who have served longer and have a greater rank) in order to pursue my happiness?

WE need to get ourselves together and quit being defeatists and throw off this not functioning government and recreate or maybe restart what this was intended to be. I believe that this government is so far off from the design that the founding fathers would not even recognize it.

Last edited by calixt0; 10-19-2009 at 9:48 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-19-2009, 9:49 AM
bombadillo bombadillo is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: central valley
Posts: 14,811
iTrader: 80 / 100%
Default

Just show the nay sayers a camo'd out .243 remington and they'll probably start drooling over it. They knock it because they haven't tried it. Or they're luke warm gun advocates who think that because it was initially a battle rifle, then its good for nothing but killing people.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-19-2009, 9:55 AM
oso grande oso grande is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 860
iTrader: 58 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheepdog1968 View Post
Semi autos IMO can be a more humane way to hunt as it offers a faster chance for a follow up shot. Beretta has a semi auto specifically designed for hunting.
As do Remington, Ruger, and Browning.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-19-2009, 3:05 PM
CALPsidewinder's Avatar
CALPsidewinder CALPsidewinder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 82
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
I suppose state game laws outlawing the use of .223 for deer hunting or requiring shotguns had nothing to do with it?
I don't know, perhaps that was also a valid reason. Were there laws already in the 70's banning the use of .223 for hunting deer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
WWI and WWII vets had a lot of bad memories too.
WWI & WWII were not as unpopular a war as Vietnam was. My father was in WWII and from what I can gather from many conversations with him is that he didn't suffer any lasting post traumatic events, unlike a vast majority who returned from Vietnam. Maybe it is a combo of the two, the lack of ballistic efficiency of the 223 round and deer hunting and the hunters of that era equating the AR as merely a human killing weapon. Whichever it was I think that time is passed with the advent of the Ar10 and the ability to use larger calibers.
__________________
NRA Life Member

"no way as way...no limitation as limitation - Lee Jun Fan"

"Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." - Vegetius
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-19-2009, 4:25 PM
M. Sage's Avatar
M. Sage M. Sage is offline
Moderator Emeritus
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 19,757
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
WWI and WWII vets had a lot of bad memories too.
Yep, but they didn't come home and have dirty hippies treating them like dirt and twisting the knife.

At least when the other guys came home, they came home to a public that appreciated their sacrifices and helped them heal their wounds.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadbolt View Post
"We're here to take your land for your safety"

"My Safety?" *click* "There, that was my safety"
http://www.huntfishadventures.com/images/nra.gifNRA Member
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-19-2009, 6:21 PM
Army's Avatar
Army Army is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Trailer Trash For Life!
Posts: 3,915
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Yet, these very same "purists" will slobber over the latest Remington, pretty Winchester, CZ, Rogue River, or Cooper while ignoring that those rifles all came from the same purpose and technological mindset as the AR15.

I like to remind them of that.
__________________
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself...A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."......Cicero
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-19-2009, 8:10 PM
NovaTodd NovaTodd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Clayton, NC - Free State!
Posts: 457
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

I have ran into this one time. It was with an older gentleman who I've known for years. Unfortuantely, there was not swaying him, as he verimently feels that there is no use for any sort of black rifle - and him not knowing I have one in 308...

In any event, we need to work together and get these crappy laws off the books.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-19-2009, 9:08 PM
rabagley's Avatar
rabagley rabagley is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 7,180
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

My grandfather has this attitude. He fought in WWII, Korea, and Vietnam and feels that all handguns and anything semi-automatic are "only designed to kill people".

So using a handgun and an AR for hunting means what, exactly... He doesn't want to hear that I own an AR let alone hunt with it. He'd probably have a heart attack on the spot if I told him that I now own five AR's and a similar number of handguns.
__________________
"Ecuador offers the United States $23 million a year in economic aid, an amount similar to what we were receiving under the tariff benefits, with the purpose of providing human rights training that will contribute to avoid violations of people's privacy, that degrade humanity," --Fernando Alvarado
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-20-2009, 5:25 AM
Mitch's Avatar
Mitch Mitch is offline
Mostly Harmless
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno
Posts: 6,574
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CALPsidewinder View Post
WWI & WWII were not as unpopular a war as Vietnam was. My father was in WWII and from what I can gather from many conversations with him is that he didn't suffer any lasting post traumatic events, unlike a vast majority who returned from Vietnam.
Your father was lucky.

According to the literature I have read, principally The Sharp End by John Ellis, what we call PTSD was no more prevalent in Vietnam than anywhere else. In WWII, virtually all soldiers were subject to it if they were kept on the line long enough. In Vietnam, US soldiers rarely spent more than a few days in combat before being rotated back to a base of some kind, in sharp contrast to the situation in North Africa, Europe and the Pacific in WWII, where fighting men might spend weeks living in the open in almost constant combat.

In WWI it was called shell shock.

In WWII it was called battle fatigue.

After Vietnam it was called PTSD. And only then was it widely recognized as something other than cowardice that victims could talk about openly. Which is probably why we heard more about it then.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cockedandglocked View Post
Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-20-2009, 6:50 AM
CALPsidewinder's Avatar
CALPsidewinder CALPsidewinder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 82
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch View Post
Your father was lucky.
Perhaps, or maybe the enviroment of this country after the war was more condusive to a speedy recovery by treating our veterans as heroes instead of baby killers. A benevolent atmosphere will do a lot for someone's psyche just as a malevolent one will help tear it down.
__________________
NRA Life Member

"no way as way...no limitation as limitation - Lee Jun Fan"

"Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." - Vegetius
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-20-2009, 9:56 AM
nicki's Avatar
nicki nicki is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,208
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default Great article

If your mindset is guns are for "Sporting purposes", then no one needs military type arms or "weapons of war".

If your mindset that the RKBA confers a duty on the population to be armed to protect our country from enemies both foreign and domestic, then everyone not only has a right, but a duty to own and be well trained with "weapons of war" so that they can protect the free state.

The second amendment specifically is about protecting our rights to weapons of war so that we can fullfill our responsiblitiy to keep our country free.

Sportsmen need to become aware that the 2nd amendment wasn't designed to protect their hobbies, it was designed to give us the means to protect all of our freedoms by force.

Nicki
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-20-2009, 10:02 AM
yellowfin's Avatar
yellowfin yellowfin is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 8,371
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

A simpler explanation might be that the early ones jammed a lot so they didn't come home liking the AR design very much, couldn't put much faith in it.
__________________
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
Quote:
Originally Posted by indiandave View Post
In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-20-2009, 10:21 AM
wash's Avatar
wash wash is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sillycon valley
Posts: 9,011
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

My Grandfather got shot down over France. Now he won't fly unless he is really really drunk.

I think his last sober flight was in route to the Palo Alto VA for his reconstructive surgery.

He seems mostly OK outside of that.

I think the confirmed kill to shots fired rate in Vietnam was about 1:10,000 so a lot of hunters might lose confidence in 5.56...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-20-2009, 12:36 PM
The Director's Avatar
The Director The Director is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hollywood, baby
Posts: 2,769
iTrader: 34 / 100%
Default

EBRs and anything too military looking at is really frowned upon in my family, even though most of my family are gun owners / hunters.

I remember one time I went shooting with my dad, he brought some 20 guage engraved uber expensive pheasant gun and I brought an AK and an AR. Went over like a lead balloon....
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-21-2009, 6:34 AM
Mitch's Avatar
Mitch Mitch is offline
Mostly Harmless
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno
Posts: 6,574
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowfin View Post
A simpler explanation might be that the early ones jammed a lot so they didn't come home liking the AR design very much, couldn't put much faith in it.
Ha ha, that too, but also because the AR-15 was a pretty spendy platform in the 1970s.

The .223 rifle of choice until 1994 (thanks Senator Feinstein!) was the Mini-14.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cockedandglocked View Post
Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy