Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2005, 12:12 PM
Mugwump's Avatar
Mugwump Mugwump is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 162
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I came across a mention of this over on highroad, buyblue.org, a website dedicated to "blue" companies and encourages people to vote with their pocket book.

I think I'll use it instead to decide which companies I may stop frequenting with my business.

"Starbucks currently has a 100% BuyBlue rating due to its executives' political contributions for the 2003-2004 election cycle. During that election cycle, every Starbucks executive whose contributions we researched on the Federal Elections Commission site contributed to a Democratic candidate." Also, I recently came across mention that they are apparently a major contributor to anti-gun causes as well. Guess I'll have to look into if this is true or not and reconsider spending $5 a day there (that's $1825 a year).
__________________
Better to fight for something than live for nothing. -- George S. Patton
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2005, 9:57 AM
schizrade schizrade is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nationalsozialistisch Volksrepublik Kalifornia
Posts: 81
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

What a worthless load of crap. If they rate companies by political contributions only they are seriously mislead. Every other category like environment are empty.

People are lame.
__________________
And God said \"taketh your rifles, all of ye, all but those unto the nation of California, for exempt must their rifles be and the resth are forlorn.\" So sayth the Lord.

http://www.schizrade.com -- my rantings.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2005, 8:55 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
iTrader: / %
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Technical Ted:
Great idea, put all those good for nothing liberal arts majors into the welfare line </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

"Things aren't as happy as they used to be down here at the unemployment office. Joblessness is no longer just for philosophy majors. Useful people are starting to feel the pinch." -- Kent Brockman.

{The Simpsons}
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2005, 10:53 PM
scott scott is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, Calif.
Posts: 35
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Interesting site. I see that Barnes and Noble gets a "100% Blue" rating. (Should've guessed that - the B&N across from my house has a Starbucks built in!)

Oddly enough the only thing I've ever bought from them have been gun rags and the quarterly copy of 2600.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2005, 12:12 PM
Mugwump's Avatar
Mugwump Mugwump is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 162
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I came across a mention of this over on highroad, buyblue.org, a website dedicated to "blue" companies and encourages people to vote with their pocket book.

I think I'll use it instead to decide which companies I may stop frequenting with my business.

"Starbucks currently has a 100% BuyBlue rating due to its executives' political contributions for the 2003-2004 election cycle. During that election cycle, every Starbucks executive whose contributions we researched on the Federal Elections Commission site contributed to a Democratic candidate." Also, I recently came across mention that they are apparently a major contributor to anti-gun causes as well. Guess I'll have to look into if this is true or not and reconsider spending $5 a day there (that's $1825 a year).
__________________
Better to fight for something than live for nothing. -- George S. Patton
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2005, 8:52 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
iTrader: / %
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Mugwump:
(big snip)
Guess I'll have to look into if this is true or not and reconsider spending $5 a day there (that's $1825 a year). </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Gee, thanks for ruining my day. For years, I intentionally didn't do the math.


On a serious note though: Look long and hard enough at anything, and something will get you p*ssed off about it.
I'm even kind of on the fence about mega-corps that overtly get behind certain political parties or those particular party's leanings and issues. In general, it's a bad idea to mix politics and business, but if someone needs to search the money trail to sniff out a company's leanings, I think that it's perhaps going too far - even if they are putting every dime of their profits into an anti-gun crusade (well maybe I'd draw the line there).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.