Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2009, 9:17 AM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Torrance
Posts: 5,863
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default Daily Breeze article on the Ammo Bill

JOHN BOGERT: All the gun, ammunition laws in the world won't change who we are

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_13403913

By John Bogert Staff Columnist
Posted: 09/23/2009 04:06:52 PM PDT





I had to look up a column I wrote back in 1994 about guns and ammunition just to see if I am as prescient as I think.

Or as crazy.

But first, allow me to say something about firearms. I am completely in favor of dropping all of them into that deep trench said to exist just beyond the Redondo Beach pier.

That way America's 90 to 150 gun manufacturers can immediately get to work creating a modernized fleet of replacement weapons for the 192 million to 250 million (an always imprecise figure) guns that we dumped into the drink.

That's economic stimulus coupled with bettering our ability to defend ourselves against one another and the tyrannical federal government.

Meanwhile, unsubstantiated rumors of a federal tax on weapons coupled with a belief among many that the Obama administration is about to clamp down on our collective firepower has bullets flying off store shelves at the rate of 10 billion rounds per year.

In fact, there is a serious shortage of ammunition caused by bullet hoarding and stoked (partly) by a number of Internet sites preaching an imminent take-down of Second Amendment rights.
One blogger who calls himself "Politicus" wrote, "The numbers do not lie. There is no way for the government to win against the People. Even the Pentagon's own war games tell them that the U.S. military vs. the militia (the people) ends up with the militia winning every time. The numbers say that the government line of `resistance is futile' is pure BS."


That, of course, is a ridiculously extreme view.

Mind you, I have no way of knowing if that really is a ridiculously extreme view. But it sounds extreme, doesn't it?

So, in fact, did news of a June meeting in Garden Grove where 15 area church leaders gathered for an interfaith intruder response course. With three church shootings this year alone, the ministers were trying to figure out a way to protect their congregations in "these violent times." Not that these violent times are any more violent than usual, not when the last decade has seen 50 people killed and 30 wounded in church shootings.

The solution? Undercover, armed security teams.

Luckily, the president has Secret Service protection. So naturally there was nothing to worry about when people openly and legally carrying firearms protested outside a Phoenix arena where he recently spoke.

Then comes what has to seem like the kicker of all kickers to firearms owners.
No, not the hotly rumored (and untrue) Senate Bill 2099 that "will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own and require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun."

No, I'm talking about the very real California Assembly Bill 962, introduced by Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, which barely squeaked through both houses early this month and is expected to be signed into law by the governor. This bill regulates not handguns, but handgun ammunition, an idea that probably sounds perfectly reasonable to anyone who doesn't own a gun and absolutely nuts to anybody that does.

Citing several examples of children in his district (Alhambra, Lincoln Heights, East L.A., crime, crime, crime) felled by stray bullets, De Leon sponsored a bill that would make it illegal to sell ammo to criminals, gang members and felons.
Dealers would also be required to keep bullets out of shoplifting reach and to take thumbprints of ammo buyers while making sales records available to the cops.

Though there is no waiting period for taking delivery, all bullet buying - Internet purchases would go to dealers for pickup - would have to be done face to face with a dealer.

The federal government once had a law remarkably like this but it was killed off, as the president who signed it nearly was, during the Reagan years.
But what's remarkable, to me anyway, is that I offered my own version of an ammo rule many years ago: "Why not a tax? If a guy goes fishing out of King Harbor, he pays a license fee that helps defer the cost of his hobby. By all means, if a gun collector wants to collect, let him. But why should the rest of us support his hobby? Why not a levy on ammunition sales? Say a 20 percent bury-the-victims tax and a 25 percent aid-the-maimed tax. That way collectors can keep collecting and the unregulated militia can go on being unregulated while those who get shot up by criminals and lunatics get a few bucks to deal with the mess."

Since I wrote that I've become far more cynical and lots more practical. The fact is, I know a lot of gun owners who are not people I'd worry about in the least. The same goes for possibly everyone in the NRA. In fact, people should be required to join the NRA when buying a firearm. That way the amateurs might learn something about responsibility and how to safely use and store weapons.
As someone who was once nearly shot accidentally by a friend, and as a friend of a guy who actually was shot by another friend, I'd like to see a move toward gun education. Either that or make all these weapons disappear.

But that, for about 250 million reasons, will never happen. Nor do I think that this new gun law will do any more than all the other gun laws to stop L.A.'s Avenues gang (192 shooting victims in the last three years) or any other gang member from obtaining ammunition.

And we're dreaming if we think that laws will somehow stop the buying of ammunition by law-abiding citizens who might go suddenly and inexplicably berserk, shooting up colleges, high schools or you and me.

All the laws in the world won't make us any different than the way we are. I want to hear your comments. Connect with me at

john.bogert@dailybreeze.com.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2009, 12:07 PM
10001110101's Avatar
10001110101 10001110101 is offline
Junior Member
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 64
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I must say that John Bogert surprised me with a fairly balanced editorial on this one.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member - CRPA Life Member - SAF Life Member
Donate to Calguns Foundation
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2009, 12:09 PM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Torrance
Posts: 5,863
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

I thought so too....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2009, 12:27 PM
Dr Rockso's Avatar
Dr Rockso Dr Rockso is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 3,674
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardW56 View Post
But first, allow me to say something about firearms. I am completely in favor of dropping all of them into that deep trench said to exist just beyond the Redondo Beach pier.

That way America's 90 to 150 gun manufacturers can immediately get to work creating a modernized fleet of replacement weapons for the 192 million to 250 million (an always imprecise figure) guns that we dumped into the drink.
Try to take my Garand and give me a "modernized replacement" and you'll be pulling back a stump!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2009, 1:11 PM
Sarkoon's Avatar
Sarkoon Sarkoon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 264
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Rockso View Post
Try to take my Garand and give me a "modernized replacement" and you'll be pulling back a stump!
Oh come on... you wouldn't trade a Garand for a functional one of these?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:56 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.