Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2009, 8:53 PM
jmf_tracy's Avatar
jmf_tracy jmf_tracy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: san jose
Posts: 1,242
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default Baucus Health Care Draft to Fine Reluctant Gun Owners up to $3,800

copied from gun owners of america website:

http://gunowners.org/a091009.htm

Thursday, September 10, 2009

By now, members of Gun Owners of America should have received pre-written postcards opposing the anti-gun health care bills that are floating around on Capitol Hill.

Please send in those postcards -- as it’s very important for legislative offices to see mounds of gun owners’ mail being dumped on their desks!

Now that Congress is back in session -- and the President has given his televised push on health care -- it is time for us to redouble our efforts.

To review the bidding:

Every major health care bill being considered in Congress would require many (if not most) Americans to be covered by insurance policies written by the Obama administration -- so-called ObamaCare.

Among other things, ObamaCare will almost certainly require, by regulation, that all gun-related medical data be fed into a federal health database -- pursuant to a $20 billion program Obama insisted be included in the $787 billion stimulus bill.

So, as a gun owner who doesn't want this data to be trolled by the BATFE from a federal database, you might say:

* “I'm not going to buy an ObamaCare policy.”

or

* “I'm going to buy the type of insurance that I want to buy.”

Well, anti-gun Democrat Max Baucus (D-MT) has a question for you: “How would you like to pay a $3,800 a year fine?”

That's right. In a legislative draft released this week, Baucus would fine you up to $3,800 for not buying precisely the insurance policy which Barack Obama orders you to buy.

So, what's going to be required under ObamaCare? And how much is it going to cost?

Baucus isn't going to tell you that until after the bill is passed. We do know that, under the Baucus draft, a lower middle income family could be forced to pay up to 13% of its income to buy an ObamaCare policy. And, presumably, a middle income family would be required to spend much, much more.

Take into consideration that the Baucus draft -- with its $3,800 per year fines and its ObamaCare -related gun databases -- is the so-called “conservative” bill. This is the one that they're trying to get Republicans to sign onto because it's so “conservative.” The final Pelosi-written conference report will be much, much worse.

Incidentally, Obama opposed forcing Americans to purchase government-approved insurance during the campaign, but guess what? He lied.

ACTION:

1. Write your Senators. Ask them to oppose the anti-gun Baucus draft, with its requirement that Americans purchase an Obama-approved insurance policy or pay a $3,800 annual fine. This legislative draft has not yet been publicly released; however, several news agencies have reported on its key features -- and these reviews are widely available on the Internet.

Click here to use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center to send your legislators the pre-written e-mail message below.

2. Distribute this email far and wide. There are people that you know who should be involved in the fight against socialized health care who are just sitting on the sidelines. Please forward this email to them and get them involved in the fight!

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Senator:

Please oppose the open-ended anti-gun mandates contained in the Baucus health draft.
Among other things, Baucus-mandated policies, which would have to be approved by the Obama administration, will almost certainly require, by regulation, that all gun¬-related medical data be fed into a federal health database -- pursuant to a $20 billion program Obama insisted be included in the $787 billion stimulus bill.

So, what if a gun owner insists on buying the type of insurance he wants to buy?
Sen. Baucus would fine him up to $3,800 a year.

That's right. In a recently released draft, Baucus would fine gun owners up to $3,800 for not buying precisely the insurance policy which Barack Obama orders them to buy.
So, what's going to be required by this Baucus¬-mandated policy? And how much is it going to cost?

Baucus isn't going to tell us that until after the bill is passed. We do know that, under the Baucus draft, a lower middle income family could be forced to pay up to 13% of its income to buy an ObamaCare policy. And, presumably, a middle income family would be required to spend much, much more.

Incidentally, Obama opposed forcing Americans to purchase government-approved insurance during the campaign.

In short, please oppose the anti-gun, anti-freedom Baucus “compromise” and please let me know exactly where you stand on this issue.

Sincerely,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2009, 8:58 PM
Blackhawk556's Avatar
Blackhawk556 Blackhawk556 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: FresNO, Ca
Posts: 4,167
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

our country is in deep debt the government needs the money

I"ve never heard of this til now
__________________
PM 4 Front Sight diamond
"If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:13 PM
POLICESTATE's Avatar
POLICESTATE POLICESTATE is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 18,183
iTrader: 25 / 100%
Default

I seriously hope this is BS
__________________
-POLICESTATE,
In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.


Government Official Lies
. F r e e d o m . D i e s .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:19 PM
SwissFluCase's Avatar
SwissFluCase SwissFluCase is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Marin County
Posts: 1,322
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by POLICESTATE View Post
I seriously hope this is BS
I'm having a hard time following this. With socialized medicine, wouldn't *all* injuries be reported to the government?

This health care "reform" is just such a big steaming turd in so many ways...

Regards,


SwissFluCase
__________________
"We don't discuss the governor's arsenal in detail" - Brown spokeswoman Elizabeth Ashford
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:23 PM
POLICESTATE's Avatar
POLICESTATE POLICESTATE is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 18,183
iTrader: 25 / 100%
Default

This Obama Care BS is going to destroy the republic. Hell over 40% of my pay goes to taxes in one way or another. Fed, State, FICA, Unemployment Ins, Gasoline Tax, sales tax, property tax, taxes on various utilities.

We're taxed almost as much as people in Europe.
__________________
-POLICESTATE,
In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.


Government Official Lies
. F r e e d o m . D i e s .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:27 PM
Gray Peterson's Avatar
Gray Peterson Gray Peterson is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,817
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I take anything Gun Owners of America (And their sycophant local affiliate Gun Owners of California) with a grain of salt. After the **** they put gun owners through with that the lies they told about the NICS Improvement Act back in 2007, I can seldom believe anything they say.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:28 PM
jmf_tracy's Avatar
jmf_tracy jmf_tracy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: san jose
Posts: 1,242
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default

i found this posted over at the minionreport forums then being a GOA member i checked the website and sure enough it is there. i posted it over here because the calguns membership are the absolute best when it come to gun laws. i want to see what the people here have to say about this.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:34 PM
nick nick is online now
I need a LIFE!!
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,130
iTrader: 168 / 100%
Default

Max Baucus is anti-gun?
__________________
DiaHero Foundation - helping people manage diabetes. Sending diabetes supplies to Ukraine now, any help is appreciated.

DDR AK furniture and Norinco M14 parts kit: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1756292
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-11-2009, 9:41 PM
POLICESTATE's Avatar
POLICESTATE POLICESTATE is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 18,183
iTrader: 25 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmf_tracy View Post
i found this posted over at the minionreport forums then being a GOA member i checked the website and sure enough it is there. i posted it over here because the calguns membership are the absolute best when it come to gun laws. i want to see what the people here have to say about this.
I'll tell you what I say about this. If something like this WERE to pass, and I didn't have adequate health care insurance through work. Well you can't get blood from a stone can you? Molon Labe
__________________
-POLICESTATE,
In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.


Government Official Lies
. F r e e d o m . D i e s .

Last edited by POLICESTATE; 09-11-2009 at 10:15 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:20 PM
Hunt's Avatar
Hunt Hunt is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kommunist State of Twosum Newsum
Posts: 4,784
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

none of this has any meaning anyway, after cap and tax, inflation, increased fuel costs, the other 60 % of the ARM mortgages reset and the greedy bankers continue their raid on American assets most of us will be living under a tarp and practicing deep breathing for patience while we wait in line for our bowl of rice.
Nobody will have 3,800 they would have accomplished "social justice" the American lifestyle is now on par with a Chinese peasant. please say it aint so
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:24 PM
Barney Gumble's Avatar
Barney Gumble Barney Gumble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,047
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Sounds like FUD/BS to me, but if you don't think so, go ahead and find the text of the bill that supports those assertions and please post it, I would love to see it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:38 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,360
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I am pretty confident this is an anti-obamacare rant dressed in camo.

Yes, it appears that this proposal would penalize gun owners who choose private health care but it would also penalize non-gun owners who make the same choice.

For or against obamacare doesn't matter the problem is, just like the OCers at obamacare rallies, this appears to mix two issues in a way that isn't helpful nor completely honest.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-11-2009, 11:11 PM
Foulball's Avatar
Foulball Foulball is offline
It smells in here...
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 2,827
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
I am pretty confident this is an anti-obamacare rant dressed in camo.

For or against obamacare doesn't matter the problem is this appears to mix two issues in a way that isn't helpful nor completely honest.
I agree.

(Note: edited original quote for clarity of that which I agree with)
__________________
Perhaps the irony of § 32310 escapes notice....With Colonists still hurting from the wounds of war, the Second Amendment guaranteed the rights of new American citizens to protect themselves from oppressors foreign and domestic. So, now it is ironic that the State whittles away at the right of its citizens to defend themselves from the possible oppression of their State. - Judge Roger T. Benitez
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-11-2009, 11:20 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,151
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

I would say that we'd be perfectly safe ignoring "news" from GOA... indefinitely.
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-11-2009, 11:21 PM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,679
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

My understanding is that the fines are not specifically geared towards gun owners, but that they would build in a penalty for not being insured.

The requirement, as I know, is only that you have some form of health insurance. If you didn't, they could fine an individual $500/year, and a faily some $1700. If your a family of 4 and make more than $66K then the fines could be as high as $3,600/$3800?

But it is not a "gun owner target."
__________________
Nothing to see here. . . Move along.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-11-2009, 11:54 PM
artherd's Avatar
artherd artherd is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,038
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
like the OCers at obamacare rallies, this appears to mix two issues in a way that isn't helpful nor completely honest.
Exactly. This isn't a gun issue. It's not really an issue at all.
__________________
- Ben Cannon.
Chairman, CEO - GPal, Inc.™
CoFounder - GeoVario™, LLC. - the hosting company that brings you Calguns™

Postings are my own, and are not formal positions of any other entity, or legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-12-2009, 12:01 AM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 27,605
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmf_tracy View Post
i found this posted over at the minionreport forums then being a GOA member i checked the website and sure enough it is there. i posted it over here because the calguns membership are the absolute best when it come to gun laws. i want to see what the people here have to say about this.
This is GOC trying to "be relevant".

If it were something to worry about you'd've heard it from NRA.

There are always worries in matters like these, but matters are so loose and unformulated that there's nothing to react against. Letters on such subjects not tied to actual legislation will be recieved with puzzlement and posted to the nutjob file ("Que?")
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-12-2009, 12:11 AM
Mssr. Eleganté's Avatar
Mssr. Eleganté Mssr. Eleganté is offline
Blue Blaze Irregular
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,366
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I'm not surprised that the NRA missed this one. When the Metropolitan Transportation Commission raised the toll on the Oakland Bay Bridge to $4 for gun owners, the NRA didn't do squat. And don't get me started on the fact that gun owners can't buy liquor in California after 2:00 AM anymore.
__________________
__________________

"Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack Austin
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-12-2009, 1:54 AM
cousinkix1953 cousinkix1953 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,385
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nick View Post
Max Baucus is anti-gun?
It doesn't make any sense. Nobody gets elected dog catcher in the Big Sky Country, if they are on the NRA's s--- list. Wanna bet, that even more of these doctor's who treat Medi-Care and Medi-Cal patients, will ask their patients if they own a gun?

Max Baucus represents a state; where the redneck Democratic governor Schweitzer packs a .45 automatic on the street. He was on CNN the other night bellowing about his right to manufacture guns in Montana. He's not engaged in interstate commerce; so the BATFE can go to Hell if they don't like it. We heard the same defense, from a Sacramento woman, who was arrested by the DEA for growing medical marijuana for her own use...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-12-2009, 2:01 AM
cousinkix1953 cousinkix1953 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,385
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SwissFluCase View Post
I'm having a hard time following this. With socialized medicine, wouldn't *all* injuries be reported to the government?

This health care "reform" is just such a big steaming turd in so many ways...

Regards,

SwissFluCase
Plaxico Burriss shot himself with his own gun. It was an accident. He did not call the police. Hospitals are required to report all incidents involving gun shot victims no matter the circumstances...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-12-2009, 2:50 AM
luchador768 luchador768 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 3,222
iTrader: 29 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mssr. Eleganté View Post
I'm not surprised that the NRA missed this one. When the Metropolitan Transportation Commission raised the toll on the Oakland Bay Bridge to $4 for gun owners, the NRA didn't do squat. And don't get me started on the fact that gun owners can't buy liquor in California after 2:00 AM anymore.
Nice!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-12-2009, 3:03 AM
cousinkix1953 cousinkix1953 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,385
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mssr. Eleganté View Post
I'm not surprised that the NRA missed this one. When the Metropolitan Transportation Commission raised the toll on the Oakland Bay Bridge to $4 for gun owners, the NRA didn't do squat. And don't get me started on the fact that gun owners can't buy liquor in California after 2:00 AM anymore.
How do they know that somebody is a gun owner, unless they advertise it on their cars? Most people don't fly their colors; because it makes them a target for gun thieves. Did you see that YouTube video of a Shreveport La. man, who was harassed by a cop, who saw the NRA sticker on his truck...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-12-2009, 3:17 AM
Kharn's Avatar
Kharn Kharn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 1,219
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I wish I'd thought up the GOA scam years ago.
Send out some nasty emails about the NRA, beg for money.
Say you're refusing to compromise your beliefs by not talking to anyone that has ever compromised on gun rights (in reality, you cant get a congressional intern to return your phone calls even with promises of free beer and fish tacos, as you're so tiny and extreme), request assistance so you can keep refusing to compromise
Say you could get stuff done if you had more money, beg for cash
Claim with just 5k more members you could defeat the NRA, beg for members
Send another anti-NRA email, asking for cash
Never get anything done, cry for cash and memberships

In reality, all it takes is twisting the NRA position a few times a month, sending out a few random emails asking for cash and membeships, and suddenly you're flooded in cash from people that believe a no-compromise organization can get stuff done in DC.

cousinkix1953:
He's pointing out that GOA is sounding the alarm that "gun owners" will be fined if they do not get health insurance, when the bill does not specify gun owners, it applies to everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-12-2009, 3:51 AM
cousinkix1953 cousinkix1953 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,385
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
He's pointing out that GOA is sounding the alarm that "gun owners" will be fined if they do not get health insurance, when the bill does not specify gun owners, it applies to everyone.
That's what I heard too. Fines for all of us. Bauccus would be committing political suicide in Montana if he pushed a bill that targeted gun owners. GOA has a branch right here in the PRK; but they aren't very effective any more. No press releases about the Cow Palace drug raid or most of the other topics discussed here. I don't that it would pay off giving them my $$$...

Last edited by cousinkix1953; 09-12-2009 at 5:22 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-12-2009, 6:50 AM
Meplat's Avatar
Meplat Meplat is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 6,903
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

He was being facetious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cousinkix1953 View Post
How do they know that somebody is a gun owner, unless they advertise it on their cars? Most people don't fly their colors; because it makes them a target for gun thieves. Did you see that YouTube video of a Shreveport La. man, who was harassed by a cop, who saw the NRA sticker on his truck...
__________________
Take not lightly liberty
To have it you must live it
And like love, don't you see
To keep it you must give it

"I will talk with you no more.
I will go now, and fight you."
(Red Cloud)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-12-2009, 7:00 AM
cousinkix1953 cousinkix1953 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,385
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meplat View Post
He was being facetious.
I never heard of a bridge toll increase in Oakland either. Nothing on the 10 PM news and nothing on KCBS radio either.

That cop in Shreveport wasn't being facetious at all. He actually does target vehicles with NRA stickers and harasses the drivers...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-12-2009, 7:03 AM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,901
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mssr. Eleganté View Post
I'm not surprised that the NRA missed this one. When the Metropolitan Transportation Commission raised the toll on the Oakland Bay Bridge to $4 for gun owners, the NRA didn't do squat. And don't get me started on the fact that gun owners can't buy liquor in California after 2:00 AM anymore.

What about when they raised the sales tax on gun owners.....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-12-2009, 7:25 AM
dirtnap dirtnap is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In a van, down by the river
Posts: 1,669
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardW56 View Post
What about when they raised the sales tax on gun owners.....
Or when they made Mcdonalds stop selling super sized items to gun owners....
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-12-2009, 8:35 AM
nick nick is online now
I need a LIFE!!
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,130
iTrader: 168 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cousinkix1953 View Post
It doesn't make any sense. Nobody gets elected dog catcher in the Big Sky Country, if they are on the NRA's s--- list. Wanna bet, that even more of these doctor's who treat Medi-Care and Medi-Cal patients, will ask their patients if they own a gun?

Max Baucus represents a state; where the redneck Democratic governor Schweitzer packs a .45 automatic on the street. He was on CNN the other night bellowing about his right to manufacture guns in Montana. He's not engaged in interstate commerce; so the BATFE can go to Hell if they don't like it. We heard the same defense, from a Sacramento woman, who was arrested by the DEA for growing medical marijuana for her own use...
Baucus is regularly rated A or A+ by the NRA. The original article has many inconsistencies like that one, which make it hard for me to take it seriously.

Mind you, I do think that this healthcare reform is a problem for many reasons, it's just that it's getting harder and harder to take GOA seriously. I used to donate to them a while back...
__________________
DiaHero Foundation - helping people manage diabetes. Sending diabetes supplies to Ukraine now, any help is appreciated.

DDR AK furniture and Norinco M14 parts kit: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1756292
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-12-2009, 8:40 AM
dfletcher's Avatar
dfletcher dfletcher is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 14,601
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
This is GOC trying to "be relevant".

If it were something to worry about you'd've heard it from NRA.

There are always worries in matters like these, but matters are so loose and unformulated that there's nothing to react against. Letters on such subjects not tied to actual legislation will be recieved with puzzlement and posted to the nutjob file ("Que?")
You're being polite - Max Baucus, antigun? And implying gunowners will be effected in a particular way just because they are gunowners? Not at all.

Such a load of crap (now I'm being polite) from GOA.

Last edited by dfletcher; 09-12-2009 at 8:43 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 09-12-2009, 9:46 AM
Theseus's Avatar
Theseus Theseus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,679
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meplat View Post
He was being facetious.
Of all my high tech phonics. . . When I first saw this I was like... Wha?

face*tious? I thought surely you spelled it wrong. . . but nope! That is one jive word man!
__________________
Nothing to see here. . . Move along.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-12-2009, 10:23 AM
Shotgun Man's Avatar
Shotgun Man Shotgun Man is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,053
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Theseus View Post
Of all my high tech phonics. . . When I first saw this I was like... Wha?

face*tious? I thought surely you spelled it wrong. . . but nope! That is one jive word man!
Read much?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-12-2009, 10:27 AM
RaceDay's Avatar
RaceDay RaceDay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Santa Clarita
Posts: 1,013
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtnap View Post
Or when they made Mcdonalds stop selling super sized items to gun owners....
What about when they laid off gun owners just before the gun owners' pensions were set to kick in?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:12 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy