Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Technology and Internet
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Technology and Internet Emerging and current tech related issues. Internet, DRM, IP, and other technology related discussions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2009, 2:23 PM
artherd's Avatar
artherd artherd is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,069
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default Bill Would cede control of the internet during a "Cybersecurity Emergency"...

http://gizmodo.com/5348063/bill-woul...rity-emergency

A revised version of a bill first introduced in the Senate this past spring would give the President power to disconnect private sector computers from the internet in the event of a "cybersecurity emergency."

The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

Section 201 of the bill also seems to imply that the government can reserve the right to regulate "critical" private networks, which could include the disclosure of information.

Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government.
__________________
- Ben Cannon.
Chairman, CEO - GPal, Inc.™
CoFounder - GeoVario™, LLC. - the hosting company that brings you Calguns™

Postings are my own, and are not formal positions of any other entity, or legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2009, 3:38 PM
locosway's Avatar
locosway locosway is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 11,343
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

WTF, seriously...

What is with the government? The internet does more than allow people to play games or cause cyber threats.

How many people and businesses would be without telephone service? TV service? News service? Camera service?

This is just insane.
__________________
OCSD Approved CCW Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor
CA DOJ Certified Instructor
Glock Certified Armorer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2009, 5:29 PM
bomb_on_bus's Avatar
bomb_on_bus bomb_on_bus is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bakersfield, CA Kern Co.
Posts: 5,440
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Whats more alarming is the fact that there are tons of dumb people that would be convinced that this would be a good idea and vote this bill into reality.
__________________

Ahhhhhhhhhhh! Man that was some great Kool-Aid.......... hmmmmmm theres a hint of something metallic. Oh well guess I will get on with the voting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGTp View Post
So if you do ban me you will hear from my lawyer as to why you think you can violate peoples civil rights
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosinnagantm9130 View Post
Oh for ****s sake, now there are two of them.This is the type of **** anti's point to when they want to make us all look crazy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2009, 8:37 PM
Telperion's Avatar
Telperion Telperion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 542
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Cross-posted from the OT forum:

I skimmed the bill and it does authorize the President to declare and emergency and shut down traffic to and disconnect government networks and other so-designated "critical network infrastructure". I don't read this bill as allowing the government to "shut down the Internet" which is of questionable practicality and would be economic suicide. I'm wary of this bill (it's mostly pork and bureaucracy growth) but in looking at how elements inside Russia were able to cripple networks in Estonia and Georgia, it makes sense to develop plans to sever hostile networks in a real emergency.
__________________
NFA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2009, 11:32 PM
locosway's Avatar
locosway locosway is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 11,343
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Telperion View Post
Cross-posted from the OT forum:

I skimmed the bill and it does authorize the President to declare and emergency and shut down traffic to and disconnect government networks and other so-designated "critical network infrastructure". I don't read this bill as allowing the government to "shut down the Internet" which is of questionable practicality and would be economic suicide. I'm wary of this bill (it's mostly pork and bureaucracy growth) but in looking at how elements inside Russia were able to cripple networks in Estonia and Georgia, it makes sense to develop plans to sever hostile networks in a real emergency.
I've worked as a network engineer. You don't cut off the internet from the public. If the government had half the brain of some of these companies in the US they'd know there are much better ways to handle a cyberattack.

The only attack that would cause a service interruption would be a DDOS, which can be handled by large pipes and proper routing.
__________________
OCSD Approved CCW Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor
CA DOJ Certified Instructor
Glock Certified Armorer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2009, 10:05 PM
sierratangofoxtrotunion's Avatar
sierratangofoxtrotunion sierratangofoxtrotunion is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Your sister's house
Posts: 4,876
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

This sounds so oddball to me. I would think if there were some sort of internet emergency that necessitated things getting disconnected, that the network people whose job it is to run this stuff would do it, not the president. It sounds like saying that if there's a forest fire, the president has the ability to shut off power through the high voltage lines in the area. Why the hell would the president be remotely involved?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob454 View Post
I would bang her till her insurance kicked in. I'll tear that up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gravedigger View Post
I need your help. Rush over here with shovels, half-naked girls and lots of beer!
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVT_Fox View Post
im 26 and I feel like a creep trying to mack the 18 year old, i still do it, but I feel creepy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2009, 10:15 PM
artherd's Avatar
artherd artherd is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,069
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Exactly - let private self-interest fix the problem cheaper better and more efficiently - without expanding gov power un-nessicarily.
__________________
- Ben Cannon.
Chairman, CEO - GPal, Inc.™
CoFounder - GeoVario™, LLC. - the hosting company that brings you Calguns™

Postings are my own, and are not formal positions of any other entity, or legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2009, 10:18 PM
locosway's Avatar
locosway locosway is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 11,343
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Not to mention that the government doesn't own the backbones, and the U.S. doesn't own the Internet.

Can you imagine the backlash from not only US customers of hosting companies, but from people in other countries?

This would push most people to host in another country.
__________________
OCSD Approved CCW Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor
CA DOJ Certified Instructor
Glock Certified Armorer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-02-2009, 8:24 AM
MrSlippyFist MrSlippyFist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,365
iTrader: 23 / 100%
Default

If little Johnny can't twiiter than the terrorists have won.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-02-2009, 9:04 AM
SwissFluCase's Avatar
SwissFluCase SwissFluCase is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Marin County
Posts: 1,325
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

The government is not qualified to be speaking in this area. They need to stay out and leave it to the professionals.

Regards,


SwissFluCase
__________________
"We don't discuss the governor's arsenal in detail" - Brown spokeswoman Elizabeth Ashford
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.