Interesting, but the haphazard, chasing a rabbit style makes it hard to follow. What I gathered was that the conclusion was that this mandate for gun ownership was being credited with a lower crime index of two comparative towns in the same vicinity.
Not to knock this article, but can anyone spot the bad logic here:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">The town of Kennesaw GA, with almost twice the population of Loris, has crime levels below the national averages for personal and total crime, whereas the Town Proper of Loris has twice the national averages. Kennesaw is the fourth lowest crime town in the United States since the above noted ordinance was passed. In the towns surrounding Kennesaw, crime has mushroomed since 1982 (when the ordinance was passed), whereas Kennesaw's continues to lower into the single digits. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>