Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > CALIFORNIA SHOOTING CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS > The CRPA Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The CRPA Forum News, Questions, and Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2009, 8:54 AM
KevMorris KevMorris is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 31
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default Is it worth joining the CRPA?

I was a member of the CRPA for probably 15 years simply because I felt I should do my part. But I dropped my membership, because apart from sending me a newsletter which I didn't like, and my annual gun laws pamphlet, I didn't really see much benefit.

Politically, it seems like the NRA are the heavy hitters. Wouldn't the $22 bucks in annual dues to the CRPA be better spent donating to the NRA-ILA and PVF?

So I guess my question is, why should I re-join the CRPA vs. donate that money to the NRA?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2009, 3:11 AM
Acorn556's Avatar
Acorn556 Acorn556 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Off 280
Posts: 2,109
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

I'm in a similar boat and I'm wondering if I should joind this club or the one that goes to the range closest to me. I don't see much NRA Action at the range and I see this club working with the range.

I think they will tell you CRPA works locally and NRA works nationally so it's not as CA focused as CRPA is.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2009, 11:49 AM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,418
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

If one can only afford dues to one organization, I think NRA would be the answer most would give. If you can swing more than one, NRA, CRPA, SAF and supporting CGF would be a pretty comprehensive upper-level list. CRPA is in a position to do things no other org is, and many of us anticipate that their strengths will be highlighted with the new leadership and direction, especially if some of the new candidates are elected to the Board.

There are others out there as well (Madison Society Foundation comes to mind) that support some great RKBA work, such as Madison's support of Kilmer/Nordyke.
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-14-2009, 1:12 PM
woodsman's Avatar
woodsman woodsman is offline
Senior Member
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Bay, California
Posts: 555
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I pay dues to both NRA and CRPA.

I recently joined CRPA as I hope they will be more in touch with local legislation concerns and will be positioned better to respond.

That being said, I wasn't impressed with the CRPA comments during the AB962 senate public safety hearing.

I am looking forward to seeing how they further respond to SB962 and other legislation during the rest of the year on the members behalf.
__________________
"The Right Of The People To
Keep And Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed"

Nuff Said....!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-14-2009, 7:45 PM
scratch's Avatar
scratch scratch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: El Dorado County
Posts: 118
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

I have been a Life member of NRA and CRPA since the mid 1970's.

Recently I have been thinking about renouncing these memberships. I have recently joined the Gun Owners of America and soon the Gun Owners of California.

The NRA is taking a wait and see attitude with the newly nominated Supreme Court Justice and the CRPA has a "watch" rather than "opposed" on SB41. In addition, I understand that the CRPA now states they must take the same position as the NRA on all legislation.

Folks, we need a more activist approach on the 2A!! We have to take back our liberties before we don't have any left.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-14-2009, 8:33 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
No, I am not a Moderator!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,492
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scratch View Post
In addition, I understand that the CRPA now states they must take the same position as the NRA on all legislation.
SB-41 was amended to take all the anti-gunowner crap out. Once that happened, then NRA and CRPA went neutral on the bill - not before.

Me, I prefer to succeed at keeping gunowners lives as simple as possible and if the other side will take amendments to placate gun owners, they can have them.

Extremism is for terrorists and the marginalized.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-14-2009, 9:07 PM
Liberty1's Avatar
Liberty1 Liberty1 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,544
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodsman View Post
I pay dues to both NRA and CRPA.

I recently joined CRPA as I hope they will be more in touch with local legislation concerns and will be positioned better to respond.

That being said, I wasn't impressed with the CRPA comments during the AB962 senate public safety hearing.

I am looking forward to seeing how they further respond to SB962 and other legislation during the rest of the year on the members behalf.
The NRA and now CPRA (they're going through some internal changes for the better) are doing Herculean work in CA. There is plenty to criticize over various issues (mostly in the past) but I would ask you to keep supporting them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by scratch View Post

Recently I have been thinking about renouncing these memberships. I have recently joined the Gun Owners of America and soon the Gun Owners of California.
I just let my GOA and GOC memberships laps as I haven't seen them accomplish anything. I like their rhetoric, but I like NRA/CRPA/CGF/SAF's strategies and results better.

You'll find as you research the issues in CA that many like minded groups, post Heller and Nordyke, are coordinating their legal efforts to maximize strategy. Also check out the Calguns Foundation and their 2nd Amendment lawsuits (founded by members of this forum last year). Now is the worst time to pull support from the above organizations when you consider the recent successes and suits in the pipe line.

If you are still impatient then perhaps showing up for one of Pullnshoot's open carry events would ring your bell and satisfy your passions until the pace of the legal process catches up with your/our enthusiasm (study the law and risks).
__________________
False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

Last edited by Liberty1; 07-14-2009 at 9:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-15-2009, 3:04 PM
jnojr's Avatar
jnojr jnojr is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,999
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

I dropped my CRPA membership quite a while ago, as it was a closed system set up for the benefit of the "old boys club".

That has supposedly changed recently. There was a lot of talk around here of reform, even some CalGunners getting on the Board of Directors, etc. So I picked up another year membership as "probation"... I'm willing to give them a chance and see if the crooked old incestuous relationships with lobbyists really are dead and gone, and that the CRPA is now actually dedicated to protecting our rights rather than enriching a few people and giving them a bully pulpit.
__________________


San Diego FFLs | San Diego ranges
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. --Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-15-2009, 5:30 PM
scratch's Avatar
scratch scratch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: El Dorado County
Posts: 118
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post
SB-41 was amended to take all the anti-gunowner crap out. Once that happened, then NRA and CRPA went neutral on the bill - not before.

Me, I prefer to succeed at keeping gunowners lives as simple as possible and if the other side will take amendments to placate gun owners, they can have them.

Extremism is for terrorists and the marginalized.

-Gene
As a veteran, Napolitano thinks I'm an extremist, so maybe your right.

Anyway, I just donated $35 to the CalGuns Foundation instead of the GOC. Hope we can make a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-15-2009, 6:30 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
No, I am not a Moderator!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,492
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scratch View Post
As a veteran, Napolitano thinks I'm an extremist, so maybe your right.

Anyway, I just donated $35 to the CalGuns Foundation instead of the GOC. Hope we can make a difference.
And thank you for supporting CGF.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-15-2009, 11:58 PM
comrau00 comrau00 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Such a very amazing link!

demande pret personnel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-26-2009, 7:29 AM
Acorn556's Avatar
Acorn556 Acorn556 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Off 280
Posts: 2,109
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

So the CRPA is like a California specific NRA right? They don't organize shooting competitions or stuff like that it's more of a legislative group.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-26-2009, 2:13 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
No, I am not a Moderator!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,492
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acorn556 View Post
So the CRPA is like a California specific NRA right? They don't organize shooting competitions or stuff like that it's more of a legislative group.
They have primarily organized shooting events and they do a very good job of that. In the past they've needed improvements on the legislative side and those improvements have recently been implemented.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-27-2009, 2:14 AM
AJAX22 AJAX22 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 14,725
iTrader: 111 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post
SB-41 was amended to take all the anti-gunowner crap out. Once that happened, then NRA and CRPA went neutral on the bill - not before.

Me, I prefer to succeed at keeping gunowners lives as simple as possible and if the other side will take amendments to placate gun owners, they can have them.

Extremism is for terrorists and the marginalized.

-Gene
And gun owners are not marginalized in CA?
__________________
Youtube Channel Proto-Ordnance

Subscribe to Proto Ordnance
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-27-2009, 5:04 PM
Fire in the Hole's Avatar
Fire in the Hole Fire in the Hole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tuolumne County
Posts: 1,563
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I initially joined CRPA out of a requirement to purchase an M1 Garand through the CMP back in 1988. I stayed with it for 10 years, but was dissapointed, saw no local benifits, and let my membership expire. So far, I don't regret my decision.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-29-2009, 8:31 AM
scr83jp scr83jp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: S.Cal
Posts: 679
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevMorris View Post
I was a member of the CRPA for probably 15 years simply because I felt I should do my part. But I dropped my membership, because apart from sending me a newsletter which I didn't like, and my annual gun laws pamphlet, I didn't really see much benefit.

Politically, it seems like the NRA are the heavy hitters. Wouldn't the $22 bucks in annual dues to the CRPA be better spent donating to the NRA-ILA and PVF?

So I guess my question is, why should I re-join the CRPA vs. donate that money to the NRA?
While attending the Raahauges Shooting Sports Fairs NRA reps were there along with many other organizations but not CRPA.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-02-2009, 10:16 PM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Simi
Posts: 1,950
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Apparently I am in the same situation as many others. I joined CRPA many years ago mainly to get a (then) DCM Garand. I stayed a member for about a dozen years and let it lapse because it seemed very ineffective in protecting our gun rights, the newsletter was insipid and every rifle range within a reasonable radius of my home closed, one after the other.

The antics of their lobbyist and his girlfriend-lobbyist I have recently been reading about in the 2nd Amendment forum are especially troubling because they correlate with what I had long suspected - that our gun rights were sold out in favor of the interests of firearms retailers.

I believe in second chances, but how will CRPA demonstrate they deserve another chance from former members?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-02-2009, 10:36 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
No, I am not a Moderator!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,492
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottB View Post
The antics of their lobbyist and his girlfriend-lobbyist I have recently been reading about in the 2nd Amendment forum are especially troubling because they correlate with what I had long suspected - that our gun rights were sold out in favor of the interests of firearms retailers.
That lobbyist is no longer with CRPA. As such, now is a pretty good time to give them a second chance.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-03-2009, 8:36 AM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Simi
Posts: 1,950
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Fair enough. But what is their plan to become an effective organization and undo some of the damage? It seems like CGF and NRA and maybe even COHA are doing all the work - and there is much to be done
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-04-2009, 4:36 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,762
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottB View Post
Fair enough. But what is their plan to become an effective organization and undo some of the damage? It seems like CGF and NRA and maybe even COHA are doing all the work - and there is much to be done
The first step is to get good new leadership and also representation in Sacramento. In complement to New CRPA's new Exec Director John Fields, we have a new legislative liaison, Tom Pedersen. Tom is a verysharp guy - both technically, and in the 'social' ways necessary to get our point across. And he's held in fine regard by the other gun groups. That's how "things get done".

Short term goal for the California coalition is always to
1. stop bad gun laws
2. keep DOJ BoF under monitoring/control & continued challenge;
2. promote significant incremental change: tiny well-planned changes
can be exploited for big results
3. #1 important even more to stop bad gun laws before favorable
court decisions come down, so we have less to fight in future
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-04-2009, 4:54 PM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Simi
Posts: 1,950
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Thanks for a well thought out answer, Bill

I'm sold. I'll renew and give CRPA another shot. Things need to get better in CA.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-11-2009, 8:15 AM
johnny_22's Avatar
johnny_22 johnny_22 is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Valley of Heart's Delight
Posts: 2,178
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default CRPA member for years now

Wife signed up, too, as an associate member (don't need two copies of their "magazine"). Web site is better and with Calgun members sending articles, I picture a better "magazine" in the future as well.

With the recent changes, I gave them an extra $100. Got a thank you letter back from them.

They are now working with the NRA, rather than against them. I ask that you join the CRPA (and the NRA as well) to help stop bad gun legislation in California.
__________________
Please, join the NRA.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-10-2010, 11:03 PM
corrupt's Avatar
corrupt corrupt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,101
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I recently purchased a CRPA life membership, along with giving $50 to CGF. I am very happy in knowing that Gene Hoffman is a board member of CRPA. Thanks for all your hard work.
__________________
Never water another man's whiskey.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-11-2010, 3:06 PM
Sunday Sunday is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shasta Co.
Posts: 5,373
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

It can't hurt but then I am a life member. The John Birch Society is great to get all the news about things happening in the Government at least 5 years before it makes the main stream news if it ever does.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-11-2010, 3:07 PM
Sunday Sunday is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shasta Co.
Posts: 5,373
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I would join several gun groups.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-11-2010, 4:36 PM
sass2924 sass2924 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 321
iTrader: 48 / 100%
Default

The CRPA has a very sad marketing plan. They are here for the benefit of California gun owners and after the 100+ years of them being organizied there are still questions of should I join or what does CRPA stand for, amazing. I think the CRPA has been/become an "old boys" network. They like to have their 2 meetings a year and a few teleconferences and think they are making a difference. They have not become an important part of the California gun owners life. This is not to say they are not working for us but they are sort of like a computer program that works in the background no one sees it and if they do they probley don't know what it's doing. Here's a thought... Why does'nt the CRPA contact every FFL in the state of California and ask them to get on board and require proof of CRPA membership when a firearm is bought or transfered. If the person can't or does not want to what good are they in the fight for gun ownership in the state. And if the FFL does not want to it only shows the don't give a ***** either. What about the cost some will argue...$22 a year, tell them to skip a couple of meals a McDonalds. OK enough for now, I'll get off the soapbox.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-12-2010, 7:52 AM
Mail Clerk Mail Clerk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,087
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I feel it's a catch twenty two issue. Without these two organizations more and more of our shooting rights will be taken away from all of us!!!!! Remember California is NOT friendly towards shooters that obey the law and pay taxes. One the other hand though it seems more and more of the shooting ranges are being closed forcing people to drive much farther just to have a little time to relax in the outdoors. With gas prices being the way they are currently all of my shooting plans has to be well planned just to afford gas. So the other toss of the coin is that without CRPA and NRA were nothing but it also appears they're not doing anything anyway except for taking our annual dues.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-14-2010, 4:43 AM
lavgrunt's Avatar
lavgrunt lavgrunt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 801
iTrader: 62 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sass2924 View Post
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=307511

Amazing!!! I don't know what would be worse, not getting a booth or getting a booth and not showing up.
The CRPA booth was across from the NRA booth at the main entrance. Someone was there all 3 days from opening to closing........Don't know how anyone could have missed us !!

It was a great event !! Signed up a bunch of new members and talked to some great folks..........
__________________
"......I come in peace, I didn't bring artillery. But I am pleading with you with tears in my eyes: If you f**k with me, I'll kill you all......"

Marine Corps General James Mattis, to Iraqi tribal leaders, 2003
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-14-2010, 9:17 AM
sass2924 sass2924 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 321
iTrader: 48 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lavgrunt View Post
The CRPA booth was across from the NRA booth at the main entrance. Someone was there all 3 days from opening to closing........Don't know how anyone could have missed us !!

It was a great event !! Signed up a bunch of new members and talked to some great folks..........
I deleted my previous post based on this info. Happy to hear we were represented and have some new members.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-16-2010, 10:11 PM
telcolineman's Avatar
telcolineman telcolineman is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pine Grove, Ca
Posts: 2,705
iTrader: 117 / 100%
Default

I am an NRA member and just recently became a CRPA member along with my fiance, She doesn't know it yet though. I personally feel being a firearms enthusiast that we need all the help we can get

Thanks Fredieusa
__________________
NRA Life Member

Last edited by telcolineman; 06-16-2010 at 10:14 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-17-2010, 3:53 AM
D.M.C.'s Avatar
D.M.C. D.M.C. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cerritos
Posts: 176
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

That would be called racketeering. Sounds like a very bad idea considering you're asking FFL holders to break the law by discriminating against those that hadn't "paid their dues'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sass2924 View Post
The CRPA has a very sad marketing plan. They are here for the benefit of California gun owners and after the 100+ years of them being organizied there are still questions of should I join or what does CRPA stand for, amazing. I think the CRPA has been/become an "old boys" network. They like to have their 2 meetings a year and a few teleconferences and think they are making a difference. They have not become an important part of the California gun owners life. This is not to say they are not working for us but they are sort of like a computer program that works in the background no one sees it and if they do they probley don't know what it's doing. Here's a thought... Why does'nt the CRPA contact every FFL in the state of California and ask them to get on board and require proof of CRPA membership when a firearm is bought or transfered. If the person can't or does not want to what good are they in the fight for gun ownership in the state. And if the FFL does not want to it only shows the don't give a ***** either. What about the cost some will argue...$22 a year, tell them to skip a couple of meals a McDonalds. OK enough for now, I'll get off the soapbox.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-20-2010, 10:40 AM
Whitesmoke Whitesmoke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 889
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottB View Post

The antics of their lobbyist and his girlfriend-lobbyist I have recently been reading about in the 2nd Amendment forum are especially troubling because they correlate with what I had long suspected - that our gun rights were sold out in favor of the interests of firearms retailers.
This is why they will never get a penny from me. The CRPA is a buisness plain and simple...they have done nothing for CA gun owners.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-20-2010, 10:42 AM
Whitesmoke Whitesmoke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 889
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sass2924 View Post
Here's a thought... Why does'nt the CRPA contact every FFL in the state of California and ask them to get on board and require proof of CRPA membership when a firearm is bought or transfered. If the person can't or does not want to what good are they in the fight for gun ownership in the state. And if the FFL does not want to it only shows the don't give a ***** either. What about the cost some will argue...$22 a year, tell them to skip a couple of meals a McDonalds. OK enough for now, I'll get off the soapbox.
Wow...all I can say is "WOW!"
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-20-2010, 3:24 PM
berto's Avatar
berto berto is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA, USA
Posts: 7,761
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitesmoke View Post
This is why they will never get a penny from me. The CRPA is a buisness plain and simple...they have done nothing for CA gun owners.
Those issues were fixed. There's new leadership and CRPA is now on the ball and contributing to the fight.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-20-2010, 11:36 PM
packnrat's Avatar
packnrat packnrat is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,331
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Unhappy

i like all the address stickers i have gotten from them.

but due to lack of money i have had to drop out of ALL the groups that have gotten money from me. even had to cut back on shooting just due to the fuel costs to get to the shooting range. soon this almost free web access will be gone. mickey D's has free access will have to look into it...but i can not stand the junk they sell.

living paycheck to paycheck is not fun...as sometimes the check just does not make it to next week....mother hubbard has nothing on me.


.
__________________
big gun's...i love big gun's
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-23-2010, 5:41 PM
glockwise2000's Avatar
glockwise2000 glockwise2000 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 2,502
iTrader: 60 / 100%
Default

I have the same idea as the OP has. The light has struck upon me when some of the top CGers are campaigning to get into CRPA board lately. The only reason that I renewed my membership with them. Othewise, I would just keep donating to both NRA and CGF for my fight.

I've always seen CRPA as a lame duck before, but now if those people could get in the board, we might get a chance to turn the cycle up to where it belongs and to its rightful place.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") Copy and paste this bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.!!!

http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h40/LIR_123/GlockWise.png
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-23-2010, 5:44 PM
corrupt's Avatar
corrupt corrupt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,101
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

When I joined I let them know I did so because of calguns and my confidence in the people involved in both organizations.
__________________
Never water another man's whiskey.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-21-2010, 10:38 AM
17+1 17+1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,319
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

They're offering front sight course coupons with membership now...seems like enough of a reason to snag the $300 lifetime membership...
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-22-2010, 9:09 AM
corrupt's Avatar
corrupt corrupt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,101
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by 17+1 View Post
They're offering front sight course coupons with membership now...seems like enough of a reason to snag the $300 lifetime membership...
Yes I got my certificate within 2-3 weeks.
__________________
Never water another man's whiskey.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-23-2010, 6:39 AM
Malthusian Malthusian is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,906
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

Living in California, I am more concerned with the laws that affect us in the PRK.

As joyful as it was to have SCOTUS strike down Chicago's' gun ban. It hasn't changed anything in CA.....yet

CRPA I would hope, would put my money where "I" am most interested in changing current law and fighting new "bad" laws.

Where I live

Yes I am a member
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:01 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.