Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > California handguns
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California handguns Discuss your favorite California handgun technical and related questions here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2005, 3:52 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,855
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

From what I'm seeing in the Ruger Forum forum, it appears some guns in early runs of the Ruger New Vaquero and the new .357 50th Anniversary Blackhawk (single actions) are being recalled. While some may be repairable, others prob will be destroyed and replaced with new guns.

[NB: This does NOT apply to full-size Vaqueros or regular full-size Blackhawks.]

Of course for CA people (and some in other states) a new handgun with new serial# involves a new DROS+ waiting period, fees, safety demo, yadayadayada. I do not know if Ruger will reimburse these fees, etc.

Ruger seems to NOT be destroying old gun and making a new gun with old serial #. Ruger phone people are telling some folks w/problems that that would be a (Fed) violation of GCA '68.

Is that true? Is there a special rule for handguns only? I doubt this. Anyone knowing more about this, please speak up!

I definitely know that GCA '68 does not prohibit LONG guns from being destroyed and new gun/receivers being issued with same S/N. Colt has for quite some time destroyed broken/damanged AR15-style lower receivers and replaced them w/new ones having the same S/N so people w/broken ARs could still retain their preban status (now moot after 9/2004 AWB sunset) and/or their California AW registration status. Olympic Arms has done the same, and in fact appears to have destroyed/replaced poor quality cast preban 'rush out the door' receivers with new forged receivers w/same S/Ns.

I'm thinking the Ruger call center "GCA 68" ruse may be less due to lack of knowledge than because they have allocated New Vaqueros, etc. for replacement and don't want to stop production line to do special serial #s for warranty replacements.

I have a 50th Anniv. Blackhawk which I love and which works fine. But with all the grief I don't think I'll send it in.


Bill Wiese
San Jose
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2005, 3:52 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,855
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

From what I'm seeing in the Ruger Forum forum, it appears some guns in early runs of the Ruger New Vaquero and the new .357 50th Anniversary Blackhawk (single actions) are being recalled. While some may be repairable, others prob will be destroyed and replaced with new guns.

[NB: This does NOT apply to full-size Vaqueros or regular full-size Blackhawks.]

Of course for CA people (and some in other states) a new handgun with new serial# involves a new DROS+ waiting period, fees, safety demo, yadayadayada. I do not know if Ruger will reimburse these fees, etc.

Ruger seems to NOT be destroying old gun and making a new gun with old serial #. Ruger phone people are telling some folks w/problems that that would be a (Fed) violation of GCA '68.

Is that true? Is there a special rule for handguns only? I doubt this. Anyone knowing more about this, please speak up!

I definitely know that GCA '68 does not prohibit LONG guns from being destroyed and new gun/receivers being issued with same S/N. Colt has for quite some time destroyed broken/damanged AR15-style lower receivers and replaced them w/new ones having the same S/N so people w/broken ARs could still retain their preban status (now moot after 9/2004 AWB sunset) and/or their California AW registration status. Olympic Arms has done the same, and in fact appears to have destroyed/replaced poor quality cast preban 'rush out the door' receivers with new forged receivers w/same S/Ns.

I'm thinking the Ruger call center "GCA 68" ruse may be less due to lack of knowledge than because they have allocated New Vaqueros, etc. for replacement and don't want to stop production line to do special serial #s for warranty replacements.

I have a 50th Anniv. Blackhawk which I love and which works fine. But with all the grief I don't think I'll send it in.


Bill Wiese
San Jose
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2005, 9:53 PM
snwnme@realguns.com's Avatar
snwnme@realguns.com snwnme@realguns.com is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Inland Empire
Posts: 55
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I thought they destroyed your gun, then took a replacement frame and stamped it your old SN
__________________
20% off? Honey, you save 100% if you don't buy anything!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-2005, 9:58 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,855
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

SnWnMe...

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">SnWnMe wrote:
I thought they destroyed your gun, then took a replacement frame and stamped it your old SN </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I'd think so too. But several RugerForums people w/New Vaqueros, etc. haven't been told that - in fact, just the opposite. So quite a few folks were up in arms, so to speak, about waiting periods, paperwork, etc. because this would be a new gun, not a 'repaired' gun.

I just think Ruger mgmt doesn't wanna disturb their efficient production line with the grief nonsequential serial #s would require.

Of course, the call center person could just be wrong, too.

Bill Wiese
San Jose
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:09 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.