Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Shotgun discussions > Shotgun Gallery
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Shotgun Gallery Post pictures of your scattergun here.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2009, 8:03 PM
bronco1500 bronco1500 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default Shotgun magazine limit. Is over 10 legal?

purely hypothetical... Tube fed semi that can hold 11+1. Legal or illegal?

Not that this gun exists or I want it to, I was just curious about the law. I was not sure reguarding shotguns and the a.w. laws.

Thanks for any help.

ps. sorry if this has been covered before. I searched but did not find the answer.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2009, 8:06 PM
ke6guj's Avatar
ke6guj ke6guj is offline
CGN Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 909
Posts: 23,786
iTrader: 42 / 100%

It would be illegal unless you owned it before the large-capacity magazine ban. The only tubular magazines exempt from the ban are for lever-action and .22 firearms.

Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2009, 8:10 PM
chickenfried's Avatar
chickenfried chickenfried is offline
Calguns Addict
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a Chevelle, down by the river
Posts: 7,161
iTrader: 30 / 100%

Looks like no, thanks to librarian for the link
12020. (a) Any person in this state who does any of the following
is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year
or in the state prison:

(2) Commencing January 1, 2000, manufactures or causes to be
manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or
exposes for sale, or who gives, or lends, any large-capacity
(c) (25) As used in this section, "large-capacity magazine" means any
ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than 10
rounds, but shall not be construed to include any of the following:
(A) A feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it
cannot accommodate more than 10 rounds.
(B) A .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device.
(C) A tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action
Originally Posted by victor1echo View Post
Hollywood is satan!!!!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 4:59 AM
cbn620's Avatar
cbn620 cbn620 is offline
Calguns Addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fresno County
Posts: 5,389
iTrader: 0 / 0%

Don't want to spread FUD, I'm just hypothesizing here, but isn't this the same as with handgun mags? What I mean is, every now and again you get a 10 round handgun mag that might squeeze to fit 11. From what I understand this is gray area.
ROM. VII 14-15
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 5:29 AM
bronco1500 bronco1500 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
iTrader: 2 / 100%

So to play devils advocate....

If I had the parts to make a 11+(or a 15/ 20) round shot gun before the ban I could assemble it and be legal.


if i was law enforcement and exempt I could have the shotgun over ten rounds as long as it is not a detach mag and o.a.l. is 26+ inches long. this would be an aw or sbs? Right?

So it seems to me that the rules are the same as the rifles reguarding magazine limit. With the exeption of the no detachable magazine.

Thanks for all the help guys.

Last edited by bronco1500; 06-08-2009 at 6:20 AM..
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 4:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host., the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved. and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to