Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2008, 8:31 PM
Trinket Trinket is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 41
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Overturning CA Assault Weapons Ban

With the recent decision made by the Supreme Court, how is it looking at bolstering a legal challenge aimed at overturning the CA Assault Weapons Ban?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2008, 8:35 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,989
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

The CA AWB has sufficient elements it could be taken down on multiple fronts even before Heller.

Some DOJ BoF conduct relating to certain areas of AW-related paperwork is also challengeable in court or OAL level.

Given CA politics and a near-irrelevant Calif Republican party, if we took it down now we could well just have another dropped into its place one year later, screwed up in different ways.

[However, I do believe we could arrange to have a half a billion dollars of AWs shipped into & sold in CA during that interregnum - enough to make enforcement of a replacement law even more confusing, and again further challengeable, especially since the replacement law would likely be written in a panic by nongunnies.]

But first and foremost, we need to get incorporation of RKBA into CA law first.

A couple of cases are already up & running that may get to that goal sooner than we'd expected.
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

Last edited by bwiese; 07-23-2008 at 8:41 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2008, 8:52 PM
leitung's Avatar
leitung leitung is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 2,913
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Sweet.. is there any links to track current cases.. I will be more than happy to own a few of those AW's..
__________________
Former "Subject" of the People's Republic of California in "exile" in Washington State.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2008, 8:54 PM
Blue's Avatar
Blue Blue is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose, Mexifornia
Posts: 7,770
iTrader: 33 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leitung View Post
Sweet.. is there any links to track current cases.. I will be more than happy to own a few of those AW's..
You can start helping by buying yourself an OLL rifle and getting familiar with the law. The more there are in the state the better.
__________________
Quote:
Lord, make my hand fast and accurate.
Let my aim be true and my hand faster
than those who would seek to destroy me.
Grant me victory over my foes and those who wish to do harm to me and mine.
Let not my last thought be 'If I only had my gun."
And Lord, if today is truly the day you call me home, let me die in an empty pile of brass.
http://www.huntfishadventures.com/images/nra.gif
NRA Member
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2008, 8:58 PM
leitung's Avatar
leitung leitung is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 2,913
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I am working on an OLL AK right now, but money is tight.

I really want to go after the high cap mag ban too.. Hopefully some good things are in store..
__________________
Former "Subject" of the People's Republic of California in "exile" in Washington State.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2008, 9:54 PM
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,485
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

One place to look is here: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=108030

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2008, 10:53 PM
nhanson's Avatar
nhanson nhanson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 286
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue View Post
You can start helping by buying yourself an OLL rifle and getting familiar with the law. The more there are in the state the better.
Is 5 enough?
I'm not sure there is a cure and most probably they are a very addictive habit.

Enjoy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-23-2008, 10:59 PM
Frijolito1988's Avatar
Frijolito1988 Frijolito1988 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 2,761
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

If you guys where to predict when the ban MIGHT be lifted, when do youthink that would be ?

so no AWB means

no more bullet buttons, more options of AW and high cap mags!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-23-2008, 11:07 PM
CHS's Avatar
CHS CHS is offline
Moderator Emeritus
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,357
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frijolito1988 View Post
no more bullet buttons, more options of AW and high cap mags!!
It would help our cause if they were referred to by what they REALLY are, standard capacity magazines. Standard capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition have been around for a hundred years. Only recently has the concept of "high capacity" been thrown around.

Now we're forced to use neutered "reduced capacity" magazines.

The more you call them "high capacity" the sooner 10 rounds starts to sound like normal.
__________________
Please read the Calguns Wiki
Quote:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-23-2008, 11:20 PM
ShadowDeviant ShadowDeviant is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frijolito1988 View Post
If you guys where to predict when the ban MIGHT be lifted, when do youthink that would be ?
Two Weeks!


I just couldn't resist...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-23-2008, 11:32 PM
domokun's Avatar
domokun domokun is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,533
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nhanson View Post
Is 5 enough?
I'm not sure there is a cure and most probably they are a very addictive habit.

Enjoy
I'm sorry to inform you that there is no cure for BRD, RRD, nor 1911 disease.
__________________
"Can our form of government, our system of justice, survive if one can be denied a freedom because he might abuse it?" --Harlon Carter
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
"Government is essentially the negation of liberty." --Ludwig von Mises
"You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." --Admiral Yamamoto
USS Hornet ARC Member.


Join today?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-23-2008, 11:34 PM
domokun's Avatar
domokun domokun is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,533
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdsmchs View Post
It would help our cause if they were referred to by what they REALLY are, standard capacity magazines. Standard capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition have been around for a hundred years. Only recently has the concept of "high capacity" been thrown around.

Now we're forced to use neutered "reduced capacity" magazines.

The more you call them "high capacity" the sooner 10 rounds starts to sound like normal.
Well in comparison with other states with similar laws, we do have "high capacity magazines" in that we have more than 5 rounds allowed in our magazines up to 10.
__________________
"Can our form of government, our system of justice, survive if one can be denied a freedom because he might abuse it?" --Harlon Carter
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
"Government is essentially the negation of liberty." --Ludwig von Mises
"You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." --Admiral Yamamoto
USS Hornet ARC Member.


Join today?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-24-2008, 1:38 AM
randy randy is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Clarita, CA & Winnemucca, NV
Posts: 4,643
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

bdsmchs

There are "large" capacity magazines and there are 10 round magazines.

That is the legal term I believe. Anything else is just you trying to make you feel good.
__________________
I move slow but I make up for it by shooting poorly.

When I hit the lotto I'm only shooting factory.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-24-2008, 1:48 AM
Moonclip's Avatar
Moonclip Moonclip is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 4,423
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by domokun View Post
I'm sorry to inform you that there is no cure for BRD, RRD, nor 1911 disease.
What is RRD? I don't have 1911 disease, I only have about 5 of them and none of them high end stuff like Wilsons or Les Baer. Do Llama 1911 sorta clones count as 1911's, have a couple of more of them

I can't wait to see a CA Assault weapons challenge post Heller.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-24-2008, 9:31 AM
rbgaynor's Avatar
rbgaynor rbgaynor is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego County
Posts: 233
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdsmchs View Post
It would help our cause if they were referred to by what they REALLY are, standard capacity magazines. Standard capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition have been around for a hundred years. Only recently has the concept of "high capacity" been thrown around.

Now we're forced to use neutered "reduced capacity" magazines.

The more you call them "high capacity" the sooner 10 rounds starts to sound like normal.
I agree 100% with this. When I talk to non-gunnies and mention the fact that you can't buy standard capacity magazines, only reduced capacity magazines I get a much more favorable response than I would by saying I want to purchase high capacity magazines. Language matters - careful choices allow us to frame the argument in a much more positive way.
__________________
- Brian

Oceanside Practical Pistol Club - USPSA and IDPA matches in San Diego County
Linea de Fuego - USPSA and 3-Gun matches in San Diego County
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-24-2008, 9:48 AM
mdouglas1980 mdouglas1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: central valley, CA
Posts: 875
iTrader: 17 / 100%
Default

yeah I think now is the time to "strike while the iron is hot" especially since the ban in DC was an overturn of a 30 year ban. I bet if you made if lucrative for the State of CA, like making a test you had to take and get a safety card like the stupid handgun safety certificate. I'm sure the state would be all for it, anything they can make money on. wish I had bought an AK, AR, or so so many more back in 2000. oh well.... wasn't thinking about it.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-24-2008, 9:50 AM
mdouglas1980 mdouglas1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: central valley, CA
Posts: 875
iTrader: 17 / 100%
Default

now if we could only get rid of that damn "roster of approved handguns list"! I hate that thing!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-24-2008, 10:59 AM
FortCourageArmory's Avatar
FortCourageArmory FortCourageArmory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 1,002
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdouglas1980 View Post
now if we could only get rid of that damn "roster of approved handguns list"! I hate that thing!
When the timing is right (post-incorporation unless I'm mistaken), the "Safe Handgun Roster is also challengable and would probably go away as well. But, the wait is going ot be a PITA.
__________________
NRA Life Member
Tim & the gang
Fort Courage Armory
1518-B Los Angeles Avenue
Simi Valley, CA 93065
(805) 526-6563
www.fortcouragearmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-24-2008, 11:26 AM
domokun's Avatar
domokun domokun is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,533
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonclip View Post
What is RRD? I don't have 1911 disease, I only have about 5 of them and none of them high end stuff like Wilsons or Les Baer. Do Llama 1911 sorta clones count as 1911's, have a couple of more of them

I can't wait to see a CA Assault weapons challenge post Heller.
RRD = Red Rifle Disease (AKs)
__________________
"Can our form of government, our system of justice, survive if one can be denied a freedom because he might abuse it?" --Harlon Carter
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
"Government is essentially the negation of liberty." --Ludwig von Mises
"You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." --Admiral Yamamoto
USS Hornet ARC Member.


Join today?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-24-2008, 12:34 PM
aileron's Avatar
aileron aileron is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: PRK
Posts: 3,249
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy View Post
bdsmchs

There are "large" capacity magazines and there are 10 round magazines.

That is the legal term I believe. Anything else is just you trying to make you feel good.
Because in DC any semi-auto that can accept +12 rounds is a machine gun.

So if they say its so, it must be so? I don't think so.

Bdsmchs is right, its political verbiage written into law, put it right back in their face.

Standard capacity magazine is the magazine that was designed with the firearm in question, which was engineered to accept that capacity magazine at initial design. So if you originally designed a 15 round mag for you handgun you just created; thats the standard capacity of the firearm. If you then design a larger capacity mag for the firearm that is a large capacity magazine.

The rest of it is just political bullocks written into the law.
__________________
Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain

Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-24-2008, 1:41 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Administrator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 37,520
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aileron View Post
Because in DC any semi-auto that can accept +12 rounds is a machine gun.

So if they say its so, it must be so? I don't think so.

Bdsmchs is right, its political verbiage written into law, put it right back in their face.

Standard capacity magazine is the magazine that was designed with the firearm in question, which was engineered to accept that capacity magazine at initial design. So if you originally designed a 15 round mag for you handgun you just created; thats the standard capacity of the firearm. If you then design a larger capacity mag for the firearm that is a large capacity magazine.

The rest of it is just political bullocks written into the law.
Until the law is changed, we're stuck with 'large-capacity' (the hyphen is part of the legal definition). I think leaving the term in 'scare quotes' conveys the appropriate disdain without unnecessarily tilting at windmills.

Otherwise, I feel as you do - magazines as designed for the gun are 'standard', lesser capacity are just odd.

Of course you do run into counter examples - the 33 round mags for Glock-17 fit, but I think they were intended for the G18, select-fire version. It's hard to look at something sticking that far out of the grip and think "That's standard capacity".
__________________
No one will really understand politics until they understand that politicians are not trying to solve our problems. They are trying to solve their own problems - of which getting elected and re-elected are number one and number two. Whatever is number three is far behind.
- Thomas Sowell
I've been saying that for years ...

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.


Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-24-2008, 1:42 PM
Mute's Avatar
Mute Mute is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 6,550
iTrader: 37 / 100%
Default

We should just refer to them simply by how many rounds they can hold. A ten round mag is still "standard" if that's what it was designed to be. Of course we should just try to refrain from using the term "high capacity" since "high" is arbitrary. After all, 20 (or even 30) rounds isn't high if we compare it to a Beta C mag.
__________________
NRA Patron Life Member
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle & Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor

American Marksman Training Group, LLC
Visit our American Marksman Facebook Page
Diamond Bar CCW Facebook Page


Discounted NRA Membership Sign Up
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-24-2008, 2:23 PM
ShadowDeviant ShadowDeviant is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdouglas1980 View Post
now if we could only get rid of that damn "roster of approved handguns list"! I hate that thing!
I second that! Sooo many nice ones to choose from... Kimber Grand Raptor II
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-24-2008, 2:47 PM
CHS's Avatar
CHS CHS is offline
Moderator Emeritus
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,357
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

On the AR15/M16 platform, both 20-rd and 30-rd magazines are the "standard" capacity. A 10 or 5rd mag for the AR/M16 platform is a "reduced" capacity mag. To me, the only thing that really qualifies as a "high-capacity" magazine would be the 100rd beta drums.

Then we've got the 5.7 platform. On the P90, 50rds is standard, but there are both 30rd and 10rd "reduced" capacity mags available. On the FiveSeven pistol, 20rds is standard and 10 is reduced.

On the 1911, 7/8 is the "standard" capacity, while on the M9/92FS 15rd's is "standard" and 10 rounds is "reduced".

What has been available and standard up until about 15 years ago, for over 75 years, have been magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. For some reason, the Federal AWB decided to name these standard mags "high capacity", and force reduced-capacity mags on us.

Unfortunately, this verbage has stuck, but that does not make it factually correct.
__________________
Please read the Calguns Wiki
Quote:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-24-2008, 2:57 PM
chris's Avatar
chris chris is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In Texas for now
Posts: 18,558
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
The CA AWB has sufficient elements it could be taken down on multiple fronts even before Heller.

Some DOJ BoF conduct relating to certain areas of AW-related paperwork is also challengeable in court or OAL level.

Given CA politics and a near-irrelevant Calif Republican party, if we took it down now we could well just have another dropped into its place one year later, screwed up in different ways.

bill you are right another bill would be quickly drafted. but after incorporation of RKBA how well would it stand given it could very well violate the 2nd?

bill would a new AWB be harder to make into law now. than in the previous Sh*t threw a goose law we have?

[However, I do believe we could arrange to have a half a billion dollars of AWs shipped into & sold in CA during that interregnum - enough to make enforcement of a replacement law even more confusing, and again further challengeable, especially since the replacement law would likely be written in a panic by nongunnies.]

now this is what i'm talking about given the AWB getting struck down this would be a paradise given the amount of OLL's in the state allready. i think the goons in Sac would really have their hands full in trying to dump a new law on us. given the post heller climate.

But first and foremost, we need to get incorporation of RKBA into CA law first.

A couple of cases are already up & running that may get to that goal sooner than we'd expected.

i like many here wish to see the laws we have jammed down our throats finally get struck down and in the future have to pass Constitutional muster given after Heller.
bill i apologize for chopping your post up like that. i hope you understand my questions in it.
__________________
http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php

Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
contact the governor
https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
NRA Life Member.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-27-2008, 12:25 PM
javalos's Avatar
javalos javalos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valley Springs, CA
Posts: 934
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Regarding Trinkets inquiry, everyone needs to donate to Calgun Foundation so they will have the legal funds to go after the AWB in California. Time to end the BS with "bullet buttons", "fixed magazines", not having this feature, not have that feature. We have our work cut out for us, we need to go after anti-gun DOJ for coming out with regulations and laws that make it difficult for manufacturers and dealers to sell guns in this state, not to mention the other laws that are designed as a pre-text to a total ban. Currently there are bills in Sacramento that require handguns to have certain features if they are to be sold in this state despite the fact that the technology just doesn't exist. They might as declare a total ban on handguns in this state. Its a known fact that handgun manufacturers are pulling out of this state, with that, they should pull their business from law enforcement as well and refuse to service any guns no matter who they are in this state. But first things first, go after the AWB.
__________________
Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
__________________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-27-2008, 1:54 PM
jamesob's Avatar
jamesob jamesob is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: exeter
Posts: 4,780
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

if the cal. aw ban goes to court, wich court will hear or decide on this?

Last edited by jamesob; 07-27-2008 at 1:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-27-2008, 2:36 PM
badicedog's Avatar
badicedog badicedog is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Alamitos
Posts: 3,043
iTrader: 68 / 99%
Default application for AW in CA

I was on the phone the other day with Alex at Robinson Arms. He made an interesting point. Why are we not applying for AW permits? Sure, we know that we are going to be denied but the more denials... this would make it easier for the NRA to file a suit.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-27-2008, 2:47 PM
AngelDecoys's Avatar
AngelDecoys AngelDecoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Manteca
Posts: 2,396
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesob View Post
if the cal. aw ban goes to court, wich court will hear or decide on this?
In all likelyhood, it would be contested in Federal Court over the State.

Quote:
Originally Posted by badicedog View Post
I was on the phone the other day with Alex at Robinson Arms. He made an interesting point. Why are we not applying for AW permits? Sure, we know that we are going to be denied but the more denials... this would make it easier for the NRA to file a suit.
Nope. Not necessary in this case. Lots of permits being denied doesn't help. That would just be a waste of resources. (If I recall Gene mentioned the permit was almost $300 just to be denied). Buy another toy instead

We only need one to challenge. 1 that is funded. Gene recently had a permit denied (just for CGF to later challenge). My guess is CGF is just waiting for incorporation before proceeding with legal *** whoopin'.
__________________
Manteca Sportsmen General website.
MS 2012 General Schedule thread look here.
Women's Classes at the Manteca Sportsmen (2012 Schedule posted)
Indoor Winter Rimfire Shoot. Information here
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-28-2008, 1:03 AM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,989
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelDecoys
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesob
if the Cal. AW ban goes to court, which court will hear or decide on this?
In all likelyhood, it would be contested in Federal Court over the State.
Given Heller & derivative cases, probably.

But the CA AW ban has internal inconsistencies that can be fought at the state level too.
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-28-2008, 11:17 AM
FlyingPen's Avatar
FlyingPen FlyingPen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,357
iTrader: 31 / 100%
Default

I wonder if NYers are getting something together to challenge their oppressive laws as well.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-28-2008, 12:00 PM
ghettoshecky's Avatar
ghettoshecky ghettoshecky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 534
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
The CA AWB has sufficient elements it could be taken down on multiple fronts even before Heller.

Some DOJ BoF conduct relating to certain areas of AW-related paperwork is also challengeable in court or OAL level.

Given CA politics and a near-irrelevant Calif Republican party, if we took it down now we could well just have another dropped into its place one year later, screwed up in different ways.

[However, I do believe we could arrange to have a half a billion dollars of AWs shipped into & sold in CA during that interregnum - enough to make enforcement of a replacement law even more confusing, and again further challengeable, especially since the replacement law would likely be written in a panic by nongunnies.]

But first and foremost, we need to get incorporation of RKBA into CA law first.

A couple of cases are already up & running that may get to that goal sooner than we'd expected.
Hey Bill I don't follow what you mean about having a half a billion dollars of AWs shipped in means to us. Are you just trying to encourage other Californians to own AWs or are you saying the more there are the better?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-28-2008, 1:04 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,989
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettoshecky View Post
Hey Bill I don't follow what you mean about having a half a billion dollars of AWs shipped in means to us. Are you just trying to encourage other Californians to own AWs or are you saying the more there are the better?
I am saying that - assuming no Heller nor CA RKBA incorporation - if the CA AW ban were to go down for a period of, say, 3-6 months there could easily be arranged $500Mil in AWs imported/sold in CA. This could happen if the California courts killed it for any of several reasons, and the legislature decided to throw up another one.

Not all CA-defined AWs are ARs/AKs or buildups from bare receivers, and some folks simply just wanna buy complete 'name brand' guns w/warranties, etc.

Lines of credit from floorplanning-loan financing firms (hey, Gene Hoffman has a helluva Rolodex!) could readily be arranged for CA gunshops to buy a ton of AWs. These lines of credit would be backed by the actual inventory - an inventory that's well-documented and protected from shenanigans not just by financial laws but because a CA gun dealer's inventory is among the most well-documented in the world, due to both state & Federally- mandated bookkeeping.

Let's say
  • the credit line resulted in an effective 15% yearly interest rate;
  • the legal gap lasted 3 months;
  • the average selling price of an AW is $1000 (hi-end + low-end);


15% / 4 x $1000 = is only $37.50 extra financing cost for the dealer which schleps into the pricing without much trouble and nobody *****es about. Remember a ton of folks paid $300+ for off-list AR receivers at end of 2005.

California is a large, populous state with a fair proportion of folks w/substantial discretionary income. I believe there'd readily be 250+K rifles at least sold in such a 'gold rush' period, with some folks buying multiples.

$1000 x 250,000 = $250Million.

At the end of the gold rush should legislation reemerge the remaining AWs would be sold to free states without much if any loss. The 1989 Roberti-Roos experience showed that the CA AWs still remaining in FFL inventory did not decline in value once banned in CA.

The more we'd get in the more any followup/cleanup legislation would be unmanageable.

OK, I was off a factor of two in my quoted post above, but still...

All the above of course changes with Heller + RKBA incorporation for CA.
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

Last edited by bwiese; 07-28-2008 at 1:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-28-2008, 1:19 PM
tyrist tyrist is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,566
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badicedog View Post
I was on the phone the other day with Alex at Robinson Arms. He made an interesting point. Why are we not applying for AW permits? Sure, we know that we are going to be denied but the more denials... this would make it easier for the NRA to file a suit.
Just by the way the permit was written it seems to only apply if you are going to manufacter/repair/sell aw's or otherwise engage in the "business" of AW's. The permit really does'nt seem to apply to ownership.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-28-2008, 1:22 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,989
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyrist View Post
Just by the way the permit was written it seems to only apply if you are going to manufacter/repair/sell aw's or otherwise engage in the "business" of AW's. The permit really does'nt seem to apply to ownership.
That's the dealer one.

A regular AW permit should be shall-issue from wording of law. Gene Hoffman applied but was rejected on specious grounds.
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-28-2008, 1:23 PM
tyrist tyrist is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,566
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Where is the regular AW permit?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-28-2008, 3:36 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 26,989
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyrist View Post
Where is the regular AW permit?
As I recall, it's just a Dangerous Weapons Permit that's used for multiple functions.
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-28-2008, 5:13 PM
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,485
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyrist View Post
Where is the regular AW permit?
DOJ didn't really implement the permit per the Penal Code and as such the CCR has some errors in it... I applied using the regular AW (Sales) Permit.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-28-2008, 7:09 PM
tyrist tyrist is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,566
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Here is a question then....If I applied for an AW permit woud I have to renew it every year? Is that renewal just meant for sales?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-28-2008, 8:11 PM
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,485
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyrist View Post
Here is a question then....If I applied for an AW permit woud I have to renew it every year? Is that renewal just meant for sales?
We don't really have enough data right now to be able to answer your question...

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.