|
2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
California Supreme Court reverses SB2
__________________
10/15/2022 - Called to get on the list 2/18/2023 - Interview set 4/27/2023 - Class 4/30/2023 - Live Scan 5/9/2023 - Interview 6/26/2023 - Approval Letter 8/1/2023 - Issued |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You should read the most recent few pages of the May v. Bonta thread for much more detailed information.
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/...879728&page=29 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
To be blunt: every single statement in the title of this thread is wrong: It wasn't the CA supreme court, and SB2 was not reversed. The reason this really annoys me is that there have been lots of threads, here on Calguns and many other places (including the MSM and Reddit, just as examples) that have claimed that "SB2 is dead" or "SB2 has been overturned. That is just nonsense. What happened (which I like!) was a minor procedural issue in what is going to be a long and drawn out lawsuit. The lack of critical thinking is what annoys me.
__________________
meow |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
This thread needs to be closed as both incorrect and a duplicate of May v. Bonta.
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/...879728&page=29 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
He should delete the OP Or the Mods should
__________________
Proud CGN Contributor USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
The OP doesn't annoy me. What annoys me is that there are so many people like the OP, who uncritically post "great news". It's a lot like all the Youtube videos put out by the likes of Reno May, Armed Scholar and all those: Clickbait front page, "great news", "breakthrough", and then nothing happens.
__________________
meow |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
The OP does annoy me; especially after acknowledging the error. It isn't hard to fix the topic or one's posts.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|