Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2013, 9:09 AM
KIMBER8400's Avatar
KIMBER8400 KIMBER8400 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 657
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default AMENDED SB 47 ON 3/20

Here is the link to the amended SB47
http://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB47
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2013, 10:41 AM
bigdawg86's Avatar
bigdawg86 bigdawg86 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,554
iTrader: 37 / 100%
Default

Eff em!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2013, 10:55 AM
USMCM16A2 USMCM16A2 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,944
iTrader: 123 / 100%
Default SB47

Folks,



F-em
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:02 AM
dmckean44 dmckean44 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 420
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

So what's the purpose of the new language?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:05 AM
Diablohtr Diablohtr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 161
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

You are a felon if you don't register your weapon between Jan. 1st - July 1st 2014 if this passes. *** hats.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:13 AM
coma13's Avatar
coma13 coma13 is offline
Übermensch
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: A farm somewhere.
Posts: 2,059
iTrader: 52 / 100%
Default

What politicians should I contact to request opposition to this bill?
__________________

As in a ruin where violets grow
In moss covered fields
On cold marble stone
Love sometimes steals into a heart...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:13 AM
Foregone Foregone is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 16
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

What registration will entail:

The registration shall contain a description of the firearm
that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks, the
date the firearm was acquired, the name and address of the individual
from whom, or business from which, the firearm was acquired, as well
as the registrant's full name, address, telephone number, date of
birth, sex, height, weight, eye color, hair color, and California
driver's license number or California identification card number.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:23 AM
mag360 mag360 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 5,181
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

looks like they can charge whatever they want to register them...did i miss something else?
__________________
just happy to be here. I like talking about better ways to protect ourselves.

Shop at AMAZON to help Calguns Foundation

CRPA Life Member. Click here to Join.

NRA Member JOIN HERE/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:25 AM
cdtx2001's Avatar
cdtx2001 cdtx2001 is offline
Hooligan
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Over Here
Posts: 6,587
iTrader: 73 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foregone View Post
What registration will entail:

The registration shall contain a description of the firearm
that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks, the
date the firearm was acquired, the name and address of the individual
from whom, or business from which, the firearm was acquired, as well
as the registrant's full name, address, telephone number, date of
birth, sex, height, weight, eye color, hair color, and California
driver's license number or California identification card number.
Shoot, I don't remember from who or which shop I acquired most of my firearms from. And how the heck is one supposed to register 80% builds with no markings. I will NOT mark mine just for the sake of doing so.
__________________
Custom made Tail Gunner Trailer Hitch for sale.
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...php?p=17820185

"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kid" -Han Solo

"A dull knife is as useless as the man who would dare carry it"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:28 AM
Diablohtr Diablohtr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 161
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mag360 View Post
looks like they can charge whatever they want to register them...did i miss something else?
Looks like $20 for registration plus $15 for the convenience of using the mandatory online system? Everything adjusted annually for inflation of course.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:36 AM
pigpen66m's Avatar
pigpen66m pigpen66m is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Hawthorne
Posts: 1,032
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

I already have a RAW. DO I have to re register it ?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:40 AM
Marxman's Avatar
Marxman Marxman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Bay
Posts: 453
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Are you kidding me. If I didn't keep up with the ridiculous laws and amendments they pass every five seconds that do absolutely nothing to stop violent crime or crime in general I'd be a felon. Why? I work full time and go to school - if not for my CalGuns vice they could amend this and I'd be so buried with coursework and things at the workplace that I'd have a snowball's chance in hell of knowing that I needed to register let alone that I'd be a felon if I couldn't satisfy their new time limit.

Idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:41 AM
rootuser rootuser is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,018
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I think this is a great idea. What I also want added is exactly what weapons the people protecting our politicians are carrying, when they are a carrying them and where. We need to know, to keep the children safe, exactly where guns will be present at all times, for everyone, everywhere. I also want the names of all Law Enforcement officers published, with their home addresses, if they take a gun home with them. We as the public need to know where these guns are so we can call upon our law enforcement agencies at any time. A map on Google Maps would be appropriate so you can point me to the right places. I will line up to register and pay no problem once they make the system even. Until then, they can go spit.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:47 AM
dmckean44 dmckean44 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 420
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diablohtr View Post
Looks like $20 for registration plus $15 for the convenience of using the mandatory online system? Everything adjusted annually for inflation of course.

So it would be $35 total per gun? That would cost me a fortune.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:52 AM
Foulball's Avatar
Foulball Foulball is offline
It smells in here...
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 2,827
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rootuser View Post
I think this is a great idea. What I also want added is exactly what weapons the people protecting our politicians are carrying, when they are a carrying them and where. We need to know, to keep the children safe, exactly where guns will be present at all times, for everyone, everywhere. I also want the names of all Law Enforcement officers published, with their home addresses, if they take a gun home with them. We as the public need to know where these guns are so we can call upon our law enforcement agencies at any time. A map on Google Maps would be appropriate so you can point me to the right places. I will line up to register and pay no problem once they make the system even. Until then, they can go spit.
My thoughts exactly.

+1 to you, good sir.
__________________
Perhaps the irony of § 32310 escapes notice....With Colonists still hurting from the wounds of war, the Second Amendment guaranteed the rights of new American citizens to protect themselves from oppressors foreign and domestic. So, now it is ironic that the State whittles away at the right of its citizens to defend themselves from the possible oppression of their State. - Judge Roger T. Benitez
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:01 PM
Lost.monkey's Avatar
Lost.monkey Lost.monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 583
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Notice they removed "actual processing costs" and replaced it with "reasonable processing costs". If that isn't telling, I don't know what is.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:13 PM
whlgun's Avatar
whlgun whlgun is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Simi Valley
Posts: 3,058
iTrader: 99 / 99%
Default

Not one inch.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:19 PM
Draankol Draankol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: on the streets
Posts: 2,318
iTrader: 88 / 99%
Default

BITFO. Yee is an ***hat of the highest order.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:20 PM
mag360 mag360 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 5,181
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

well nobody needs more than 1 gun so it is completely reasonable to charge whatever they want. only an unreasonable person would own more than 1 "assault weapon".
__________________
just happy to be here. I like talking about better ways to protect ourselves.

Shop at AMAZON to help Calguns Foundation

CRPA Life Member. Click here to Join.

NRA Member JOIN HERE/
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:31 PM
gotshotgun?'s Avatar
gotshotgun? gotshotgun? is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alameda County
Posts: 3,667
iTrader: 122 / 100%
Default

"(2) Existing law requires that any person who, within this state, possesses an assault weapon, except as otherwise provided, be punished as a felony or for a period not to exceed one year, in a county jail "

This makes no sense unless they mean it as a wobbler. A period not to exceed one year in county jail is a misdemeanor offense. And the grammar is terrible too...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:32 PM
Diablohtr Diablohtr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 161
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gotshotgun? View Post
"(2) Existing law requires that any person who, within this state, possesses an assault weapon, except as otherwise provided, be punished as a felony or for a period not to exceed one year, in a county jail "

This makes no sense unless they mean it as a wobbler. A period not to exceed one year in county jail is a misdemeanor offense. And the grammar is terrible too...
Yes, you're right. I believe that's how "wobblers" are worded.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:33 PM
gotshotgun?'s Avatar
gotshotgun? gotshotgun? is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alameda County
Posts: 3,667
iTrader: 122 / 100%
Default

They cannot enforce providing names of sellers as a prerequisite for registration as keeping those names was never a requirement for gun ownership and there's no way gun owners are going to remember the names and locations where they purchased their guns from years back.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:36 PM
mattj9090 mattj9090 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chico
Posts: 251
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

How exactly are they planning on enforcing registration of firearms that are already in a person's possession?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:37 PM
sreiter's Avatar
sreiter sreiter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,664
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foregone View Post
What registration will entail:

The registration shall contain a description of the firearm
that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks, the
date the firearm was acquired, the name and address of the individual
from whom, or business from which, the firearm was acquired, as well
as the registrant's full name, address, telephone number, date of
birth, sex, height, weight, eye color, hair color, and California
driver's license number or California identification card number.
so what happens if i want to change the butt stock, or hand guards from a2 plastic to quad rail???

or my barrel needs changing, so i switch from middy to 20" inches?
__________________


"personal security, personal liberty, and private property"--could not be maintained solely by law, for "in vain would these rights be declared, ascertained, and protected by the dead letter of the laws, if the constitution had provided no other method to secure their actual enjoyment." -
William Blackstone
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-21-2013, 12:46 PM
stix213's Avatar
stix213 stix213 is offline
AKA: Joe Censored
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Manteca
Posts: 18,957
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattj9090 View Post
How exactly are they planning on enforcing registration of firearms that are already in a person's possession?
Just like they do now. Prison time for non-compliance when they are discovered one at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:05 PM
veeklog's Avatar
veeklog veeklog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Now Orange County
Posts: 1,032
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Is this the same bill from last year to outlaw BB firearms and make everyone register them? If this passes they want $35 per rifle for registration? Don't DeLeon an Yee have anything better to do?!?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:07 PM
madsend81 madsend81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Diego County
Posts: 916
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sreiter View Post
so what happens if i want to change the butt stock, or hand guards from a2 plastic to quad rail???

or my barrel needs changing, so i switch from middy to 20" inches?

It would seem that "a description of the firearm that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks" would simply be the serial number. But IANAL, this i just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:12 PM
dmckean44 dmckean44 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 420
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by madsend81 View Post
It would seem that "a description of the firearm that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks" would simply be the serial number. But IANAL, this i just my opinion.
In the past that's all it's meant. How do you describe a flat?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:55 PM
Calplinker Calplinker is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,610
iTrader: 12 / 93%
Default

"Exclude from Punishment".

Interesting change of words in the bills language. Should this become law, people who comply and register all their guns affected, could still be considered to have an illegal assault weapon, just "excluded from punishment".

I guess now we know why they killed the bill to eliminate grandfathering. If this passes, they'll just deem all BB guns assault weapons and even if you comply with registration, they will just consider them a public nuisance worthy of confiscation.

You just won't face prosecution.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:56 PM
CAL.BAR CAL.BAR is offline
CGSSA OC Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South OC
Posts: 5,627
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pigpen66m View Post
I already have a RAW. DO I have to re register it ?
NO - only the "bullet button" type rifles. At least under THIS bill. There are others out there.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:57 PM
1981's Avatar
1981 1981 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 111
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veeklog View Post
Is this the same bill from last year to outlaw BB firearms and make everyone register them? If this passes they want $35 per rifle for registration? Don't DeLeon an Yee have anything better to do?!?
nope, they are trying to make a name for themselves, maybe running for governor or congress or whatever some day...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-21-2013, 1:59 PM
Dantedamean's Avatar
Dantedamean Dantedamean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,293
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calplinker View Post
"Exclude from Punishment".

Interesting change of words in the bills language. Should this become law, people who comply and register all their guns affected, could still be considered to have an illegal assault weapon, just "excluded from punishment".

I guess now we know why they killed the bill to eliminate grandfathering. If this passes, they'll just deem all BB guns assault weapons and even if you comply with registration, they will just consider them a public nuisance worthy of confiscation.

You just won't face prosecution.
Interesting interpretation, I didn't noticed that.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:02 PM
0150r 0150r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 140
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Could they compare DROS's to the list of registered firearms to find out who hasn't registered theirs and then file a bench warrant for their arrest? If so, what happens to someone who moved out of state? Does this mean I need to "un-register" my CA purchased firearm when I move back to Wisconsin this August to avoid being labeled as a criminal? Being charged for felony related to firearms (even if it's dropped) is enough these days to be stripped of our 2nd ammendment rights.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:12 PM
CessnaDriver's Avatar
CessnaDriver CessnaDriver is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9,455
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Turning law abiding citizens into felons in mass numbers would be a very big mistake on their part.


Mass resistance will occur.
__________________
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/signaturepics/sigpic28512_1.gif

"Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:15 PM
CessnaDriver's Avatar
CessnaDriver CessnaDriver is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9,455
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

And of course this does zero to stop criminals or keep anyone safer.

Even the clillllldreeeennnn!!!
__________________
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/signaturepics/sigpic28512_1.gif

"Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."

Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:15 PM
dtjester's Avatar
dtjester dtjester is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Inland Empire
Posts: 513
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

So this means my Marlin 795 (mag fed .22) and model 60 (tube fed .22) will have to be registered as well??
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhythm of Life View Post
Buy the cow and shove a keg up its ***, like beer butt chicken but better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SD Bay Basser View Post
...I'm safe and they smell like snuggle bear now.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:23 PM
Forewarned's Avatar
Forewarned Forewarned is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 235
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

If this law should pass, would I be able to register a lower in my kids name? This is after all... for the children.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:24 PM
1981's Avatar
1981 1981 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 111
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtjester View Post
So this means my Marlin 795 (mag fed .22) and model 60 (tube fed .22) will have to be registered as well??
nope, at least not yet...
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:25 PM
CessnaDriver's Avatar
CessnaDriver CessnaDriver is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9,455
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Pretty incredible, WTF do they think they are preventing by keeping a list of law abiding citizens?

There is only one reason you need a list!
__________________
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/signaturepics/sigpic28512_1.gif

"Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."

Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-21-2013, 2:28 PM
Hoop's Avatar
Hoop Hoop is offline
Ready fo HILLARY!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn
Posts: 11,515
iTrader: 77 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CessnaDriver View Post
Turning law abiding citizens into felons in mass numbers would be a very big mistake on their part.


Mass resistance will occur.
They did it before with previous bans.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy