Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > National 2nd Amend. Political & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

National 2nd Amend. Political & Legal Discussion Discuss national gun rights and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2018, 12:35 PM
WaffleMachine's Avatar
WaffleMachine WaffleMachine is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 66
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Judge rules I-1639 in WA cannot appear on ballot

Fairfax, Va.—The Thurston County Superior Court today ruled in favor of the National Rifle Association and ordered a writ of mandamus to prevent I-1639 from appearing on the ballot. The judge agreed the signature sheets did not comply with state law – the font size was too small to be readable and didn't include strikethroughs.

It's likely the battle will continue, but it's good to see judges upholding the law.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2018, 3:41 PM
Cannikin Cannikin is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: SW WA (recently left CA)
Posts: 21
iTrader: 1 / 100%

Glad to see a judge, even in the very liberal Puget Sound area, upholding the law. This was not even a ruling on a partisan issue (e.g. 2A or the WA constitution's equivalent). This was a straight up technical violation of the law, with invalid petition formatting, which made it literally impossible to tell what was actually being changed in the initiative.

It's telling that the supporters' are literally asking for the WA Supreme Court to ignore the law and turn a blind eye to "flawed" initiative petitions (their own words). The SC would really have to twist itself into a pretzel trying to justify a straightforward, non-partisan, violation of the law. I still wouldn't put it past them though, knowing the super liberal elected justices.

Of course they will try again as soon as they can, but hopefully those multi-millionare/billionaire backers who funded more than 90% of the initiative, will be more hesitant to throw their millions at it, knowing it was all wasted due to incompetence.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2018, 5:22 PM
lhecker51's Avatar
lhecker51 lhecker51 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Formerly From People's Republic of Dumphucistan
Posts: 661
iTrader: 8 / 100%

State Supreme Court reversed it. It is now back on the ballot.
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host., the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved. and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to