Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > SPECIALTY FORUMS > FFL's Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

FFL's Forum For open discussion between FFLs and polite questions for FFLs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2017, 4:40 PM
Elite Armory's Avatar
Elite Armory Elite Armory is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Castro Valley, CA
Posts: 389
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default AB 2165 / PC 32000.(b)(6) ???

So does anyone know much about this? I'm hearing all kinds of things and we called the DOJ which would not answer any specific questions and just referred us to PC 3200 Sub B Paragraph 6 which didn't answer anything for us.

Could someone please explain this in plain English? Can LEO still ppt off roster firearms to non LEO? Are peace officers such as correctional officers also able to continue to ppt off roster firearms to non peace officers?
__________________
Elite Armory
3636 Castro Valley Blvd #1
Castro Valley, CA 94546
(510) 538-1686

Hours: Tues-Sat: 11:00am-6:30pm
07 FFL

*Follow us on Twitter and/or FaceBook for updates on what we have coming into the shop.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2017, 4:48 PM
DrJeds44 DrJeds44 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 107
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Yes they can still PPT stuff

The newly classified agents allowed to now buy off roster guns can not PPT their owned off roster guns.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2017, 4:53 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 36,682
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJeds44 View Post
Yes they can still PPT stuff

The newly classified agents allowed to now buy off roster guns can not PPT their owned off roster guns.
... IF they got those off-Roster guns, in 2017 or later, by being exempt due to their employment.

OTOH, they may still PPT off-Roster guns they got by earlier PPT or by intrafamilial transfer or inheritance.
__________________
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice]

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2017, 5:28 PM
DrJeds44 DrJeds44 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 107
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Librarian View Post
... IF they got those off-Roster guns, in 2017 or later, by being exempt due to their employment.

OTOH, they may still PPT off-Roster guns they got by earlier PPT or by intrafamilial transfer or inheritance.
Yep.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2017, 5:34 PM
Elite Armory's Avatar
Elite Armory Elite Armory is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Castro Valley, CA
Posts: 389
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Thanks for the clarification.

What specifically are the new qualified agents?
__________________
Elite Armory
3636 Castro Valley Blvd #1
Castro Valley, CA 94546
(510) 538-1686

Hours: Tues-Sat: 11:00am-6:30pm
07 FFL

*Follow us on Twitter and/or FaceBook for updates on what we have coming into the shop.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2017, 7:18 PM
Patfishandshoot Patfishandshoot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 23
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elite Armory View Post
Thanks for the clarification.

What specifically are the new qualified agents?
Here are the 'new' ones:

(A) The Department of Parks and Recreation.

(B) The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

(C) The Division of Investigation of the Department of Consumer Affairs.

(D) The Department of Motor Vehicles.

(E) The Fraud Division of the Department of Insurance.

(F) The State Department of State Hospitals.

(G) The Department of Fish and Wildlife.

(H) The State Department of Developmental Services.

(I) The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

(J) A county probation department.

(K) The Los Angeles World Airports, as defined in Section 830.15.

(L) A K–12 public school district for use by a school police officer, as described in Section 830.32.

(M) A municipal water district for use by a park ranger, as described in Section 830.34.

(N) A county for use by a welfare fraud investigator or inspector, as described in Section 830.35.

(O) A county for use by the coroner or the deputy coroner, as described in Section 830.35.

(P) The Supreme Court and the courts of appeal for use by marshals of the Supreme Court and bailiffs of the courts of appeal, and coordinators of security for the judicial branch, as described in Section 830.36.

(Q) A fire department or fire protection agency of a county, city, city and county, district, or the state for use by either of the following:

(i) A member of an arson-investigating unit, regularly paid and employed in that capacity pursuant to Section 830.37.

(ii) A member other than a member of an arson-investigating unit, regularly paid and employed in that capacity pursuant to Section 830.37.

(R) The University of California Police Department, or the California State University Police Departments, as described in Section 830.2.

(S) A California Community College police department, as described in Section 830.32.



For LCM's here is the penal code (32405) applicable to the sale of such magazines to LEO's (pretty much covers all gun toting local/state/fed LEO regardless of agency name):

Penal Code Section 32405.
Section 32310 does not apply to the sale to, lending to, transfer to, purchase by, receipt of, possession of, or importation into this state of, a large-capacity magazine by a sworn peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2, or sworn federal law enforcement officer, who is authorized to carry a firearm in the course and scope of that officer’s duties.


^

Last edited by Patfishandshoot; 01-03-2017 at 7:28 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2017, 12:21 AM
ugimports's Avatar
ugimports ugimports is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,405
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default

For this post 2017 PPT thing.. are we (FFLs) supposed to know this or will DOJ kick it back if one of these LEOs tries to PPT an off roster they recently received and didn't like? I just had an LEO (not in the above category) that purchased a Glock 43 that he didn't like as his carry piece (preferred his Ruger LC9s) and sold it off (in this case to his lucky brother). If he was in one of these new categories, how am I supposed know that? Especially, if they as the seller, don't have any reason to present me their exempt credentials in a sale scenario?
__________________
us on facebook
UG Imports - Fremont, CA FFL - Transfers, New Gun Sales
Closure Schedule: http://ugimports.com/closed
web: http://ugimports.com/calguns / email: sales@ugimports.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/ugimports / phone: (510) 371-GUNS (4867)
G+: http://google.com/+UGImportsLLCFremont / FB: http://facebook.com/ugimports
New Stock Announced on G+ and Facebook. NorCal Range Maps: http://ugimports.com/rangemaps
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2017, 12:35 AM
SkyHawk's Avatar
SkyHawk SkyHawk is offline
Front Toward Enemy 🔫
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ☠ Outside my Southern Comfort Zone ☠
Posts: 10,442
iTrader: 123 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ugimports View Post
For this post 2017 PPT thing.. are we (FFLs) supposed to know this or will DOJ kick it back if one of these LEOs tries to PPT an off roster they recently received and didn't like? I just had an LEO (not in the above category) that purchased a Glock 43 that he didn't like as his carry piece (preferred his Ruger LC9s) and sold it off (in this case to his lucky brother). If he was in one of these new categories, how am I supposed know that? Especially, if they as the seller, don't have any reason to present me their exempt credentials in a sale scenario?
I doubt DOJ will cross check. Who is liable/penalized when this law is broken - is it the FFL or the seller?

If the FFL has any exposure, then I guess you have to start asking every single person who PPT sells:

1) are you Leo
(If yes)
2) are you one of the newly exempt Leos
(If yes)
3) did you acquire this gun using the exemption

Or you could just ask it as one long question. And you probably should collect affidavits of answers to those questions from every seller.

If the FFL has no exposure, then I wouldn't bother asking anything. After all, you dont ask sellers if the guns are stolen. It's on them.

I can't believe the DOJ has no guidance, but it is typical for them. They want everyone pro-gun to stumble into a crime.
__________________
.



"Texans always move them!"
General Robert E. Lee, May 6, 1864 - Battle of the Wilderness

Last edited by SkyHawk; 01-04-2017 at 12:40 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2017, 7:15 AM
ugimports's Avatar
ugimports ugimports is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,405
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHawk View Post
I doubt DOJ will cross check. Who is liable/penalized when this law is broken - is it the FFL or the seller?

If the FFL has any exposure, then I guess you have to start asking every single person who PPT sells:

1) are you Leo
(If yes)
2) are you one of the newly exempt Leos
(If yes)
3) did you acquire this gun using the exemption

Or you could just ask it as one long question. And you probably should collect affidavits of answers to those questions from every seller.

If the FFL has no exposure, then I wouldn't bother asking anything. After all, you dont ask sellers if the guns are stolen. It's on them.

I can't believe the DOJ has no guidance, but it is typical for them. They want everyone pro-gun to stumble into a crime.
The reason I have a little bit of worry is because I think Botach Tactical in Southern California got nailed when a person misrepresented her ID as an LEO and the gun was eventually used in a crime. The store was held liable for not knowing (or should have known) that the credentials were fake. There's some precedent.

Old reference: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...928-story.html

I don't recall what the results of that were.
__________________
us on facebook
UG Imports - Fremont, CA FFL - Transfers, New Gun Sales
Closure Schedule: http://ugimports.com/closed
web: http://ugimports.com/calguns / email: sales@ugimports.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/ugimports / phone: (510) 371-GUNS (4867)
G+: http://google.com/+UGImportsLLCFremont / FB: http://facebook.com/ugimports
New Stock Announced on G+ and Facebook. NorCal Range Maps: http://ugimports.com/rangemaps
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2017, 1:51 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 36,682
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHawk View Post
I doubt DOJ will cross check. Who is liable/penalized when this law is broken - is it the FFL or the seller?
.
Looks like the FFL -
Quote:
a person licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, shall not process the sale or transfer of an unsafe handgun
and it appears doing that would be a violation of 32000(a)
Quote:
32000.

(a) A person in this state who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state for sale, keeps for sale, offers or exposes for sale, gives, or lends an unsafe handgun shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year.
...
In theory, DOJ could reject the PPT by matching the serial number of the gun with the existence of a LEO exception (after 2016, transferee is in the new class) on the earlier transfer and seeing if there is a LEO exception on the current transfer; no LEO exemption on this one, no transfer.
__________________
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice]

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.



Last edited by Librarian; 01-04-2017 at 1:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-04-2017, 2:28 PM
mej16489 mej16489 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,178
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Librarian View Post
In theory, DOJ could reject the PPT by matching the serial number of the gun with the existence of a LEO exception (after 2016, transferee is in the new class) on the earlier transfer and seeing if there is a LEO exception on the current transfer; no LEO exemption on this one, no transfer.
Does the DROS software have two different 'exception codes' for LEOs? If it doesn't, there isn't any way for the DoJ to know without additional information.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-2017, 11:31 PM
OniKoroshi's Avatar
OniKoroshi OniKoroshi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Capitol of PRK
Posts: 1,300
iTrader: 47 / 100%
Default

Wait... so I can get a job at DMV and buy off roster handguns? Slap me silly and call me Hillary!!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-11-2018, 7:42 PM
michaelinfv's Avatar
michaelinfv michaelinfv is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 81
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I'm sure you all realize this but the DMV investigations unit has at least one 832 PC uninformed "investigator" (PEACE OFFICER) the Fire Dept.has arson inv. Officers. (PEACE OFFICER) etc even the post office has Ferdral Peace Officers and the Military has uniformed an UC Fed. Cops.

So I think someone is not seeing the broader picure...Could be me but I don't know what all the whoopla is about. I retired as an Los Angeles cop in 2014 and that does put me further out of the loop.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-11-2018, 9:39 PM
anbu_yoshi's Avatar
anbu_yoshi anbu_yoshi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,359
iTrader: 89 / 100%
Default

PC32000 has absolutely nothing to do with peace officer status or even law enforcement status (in a traditional sense) for that matter. The only requirement is for individuals to be "sworn" members of the listed agencies i.e. custodial deputies, correctional officers, and security officers with limited peace officer powers from an SO may purchase under the original exemption while full POST, full powered peace officers from other organizations are under the new, "lesser" class.

This statute has everything to do with control and nothing to do with logic.

Last edited by anbu_yoshi; 02-12-2018 at 10:43 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-11-2018, 9:46 PM
autopro autopro is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 243
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ugimports View Post
The reason I have a little bit of worry is because I think Botach Tactical in Southern California got nailed when a person misrepresented her ID as an LEO and the gun was eventually used in a crime. The store was held liable for not knowing (or should have known) that the credentials were fake. There's some precedent.

Old reference: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...928-story.html

I don't recall what the results of that were.
Amelia Suarez the security guard plead no contest and was sentenced to 36 months probation, 300 hours of community service and to take a firearm safety class. Botach was convicted after a trial but I don't know what the sentence was.

She was a civilian employee of the Sheriffs Dept. and I do not believe was allowed to carry even on the job.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-11-2018, 11:33 PM
I Swan's Avatar
I Swan I Swan is online now
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,277
iTrader: 58 / 100%
Default

I know a CA FFL that when using his shop for a PPT makes you sign a form that you are not one of the 2nd tier cops trying to sell a off roster handgun acquired through their exemption from the roster.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-12-2018, 10:01 AM
kemasa's Avatar
kemasa kemasa is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 8,962
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Hmmm, this came back to life.
__________________
Kemasa.
FFL Transfer/Special Order Dealer since 1993.
Net-FFL list maintainer.

Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-12-2018, 11:41 AM
kemasa's Avatar
kemasa kemasa is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 8,962
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I Swan View Post
I know a CA FFL that when using his shop for a PPT makes you sign a form that you are not one of the 2nd tier cops trying to sell a off roster handgun acquired through their exemption from the roster.
Sadly, I think that is a very good idea due to the wording of the law since the CA FFL appears to be the one who is violating the law, yet also the one who has no means of knowing whether the law is being violated.

A CA FFL has no means of knowing that the firearm was transferred using a LEO exemption, nor what type of LEO the person is/was. The CA DOJ does not ask for the type of LEO for the DROS, so it is not directly recorded by means of the DES. I don't trust the courts to accept that the FFL did not know nor had no means of confirming how the firearm was transferred previously. At least if the FFL asks, then it shows that they attempted to ensure that they were not violating the law.
__________________
Kemasa.
FFL Transfer/Special Order Dealer since 1993.
Net-FFL list maintainer.

Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-13-2018, 8:18 AM
OCArmory's Avatar
OCArmory OCArmory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,013
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

I contacte dJason Davis and he made up a form for me. Just a little extra insurance
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:19 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.