Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > National 2nd Amend. Political & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

National 2nd Amend. Political & Legal Discussion Discuss national gun rights and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #321  
Old 09-18-2018, 5:02 PM
freonr22's Avatar
freonr22 freonr22 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 12,336
iTrader: 29 / 100%
Default

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...ml#document/p1
the letter from Katz
__________________
<img src=http://calgunsfoundation.org/images/stories/San-Benito.jpg border=0 alt= />[IMG]file:///C:/Users/PCMECH%7E1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-3.png[/IMG][IMG]file:///C:/Users/PCMECH%7E1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-4.png[/IMG]
Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
We will win. We are right. We will never stop fighting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
They don't believe it's possible, but then Alison didn't believe there'd be 350K - 400K OLLs in CA either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by louisianagirl View Post
Our fate is ours alone to decide as long as we remain armed heavily enough to dictate it.

Last edited by freonr22; 09-18-2018 at 5:17 PM..
  #322  
Old 09-18-2018, 5:17 PM
Kevfin's Avatar
Kevfin Kevfin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: California
Posts: 287
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freonr22 View Post
Cute tactic. Obvious in nature. Hope it fails.
__________________
The race is not won to the swift or the strong, but to the one who endures until the end.

Safety Rule #1:
1) Treat all tweakers like they are loaded
  #323  
Old 09-18-2018, 5:51 PM
scbauer's Avatar
scbauer scbauer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 672
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default

Quote:
“I agree with her 100 percent that the rushed process to hold a hearing on Monday has been unfair and is reminiscent of the treatment of Anita Hill," Feinstein said
The process isn’t “rushed,” this chick has had 35 years to get her story straight.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...r-lawyers.html
__________________
  #324  
Old 09-18-2018, 5:58 PM
dfletcher's Avatar
dfletcher dfletcher is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 12,634
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Ms. Ford's latest request is that an FBI investigation must take place. And while it could yield nothing actionable in criminal court, and her civil remedies have long expired, it would take time an d cause public relations issues for the nominee. Which is what she's hoping for.

It would be interesting, along those same PR lines, to know how many times she voted for Bill Clinton.
  #325  
Old 09-18-2018, 6:04 PM
TRICKSTER's Avatar
TRICKSTER TRICKSTER is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Contra Costa County
Posts: 12,222
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Woah, you have really outdone yourself with this one. You say there is "zero evidence". Did you forget that eyewitness testimony is "evidence". I thought you were in law enforcement? Didn't they teach you that your first day at the academy? You are beginning to sound more like a Russian troll. The witness is a college professor, a solid citizen, and an academically recognized author.

Here's the thing about eyewitness testimony; you don't have to remember every single detail for your testimony to be valid. You don't have to remember what color socks the assailant was wearing, or whether the robber was wearing cowboy boots.

As for your reliance on the other person in the room, are you telling me that a person who has written extensively about his blackout drinking in high school and who the victim testified had been drinking heavily is anything close to reliable when saying that something "DIDN'T HAPPEN"?

About the lateness of the accusation in the confirmation process that was because Dianne "Let's work with Trump" Feinstein was not going to take any action because she is about as corrupt as they come and she was just going to let Kavanaugh slide through. Others got wind of the letter and blew the lid off.

As for your last point, you would have us believe that 65 women spontaneously sent letters to Chuck Grassley saying that Kavanaugh did not rape them? Now that there is the biggest howler I have heard in a long time.

You are always good for a laugh.

By the way, the Republicans managed to discredit Anita Hill and get Clarence Thomas confirmed. If they try that again there may be a serious backlash in the midterms.
She is making a claim/accusation about something that supposedly happened decades ago. There is zero evidence to substantiate the claim. But you have no problem with the guilty till proven innocent lynch mob that are using this to ruin a man's life. Just more proof that it is liberals that believe in facist ideology. Now go ahead, spread lies and troll on. It's all you are good for.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Weiner is in jail for doing much less than Kavanaugh or your Dear Leader Trump have done and they are walking around free.


NRA Benefactor Member

Police brutality? Visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRd5oucG114 to learn more about "isolated incidents"
  #326  
Old 09-18-2018, 6:04 PM
Offwidth Offwidth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 152
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I am somewhat new here, was this Carlos fellow always as deranged? What is he doing at 2A/forum? Trolling?
  #327  
Old 09-18-2018, 6:09 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 482
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I think there a pretty good chance that since this came out Ford has been remembering things she didn't before, like Kavanaugh wasn't the guy who attacked her or she's not sure.

Bottom line, she can't testify anymore , so now her lawyer is just pushing the Democratic agenda to delay delay delay.

It's so obvious it's sad..
  #328  
Old 09-18-2018, 6:15 PM
larkja larkja is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 815
iTrader: 39 / 100%
Default

We're all asking the wrong question. I don't think for one second the dems believe there is a shred of truth in what Ford is saying. But they don't care.

This whole thing is political theater designed to delay and distract. The real question is distract from what or whom. What else is going on behind the scenes while this is taking center stage?

That's the real question. Any ideas?

Last edited by larkja; 09-18-2018 at 6:17 PM..
  #329  
Old 09-18-2018, 6:32 PM
Noble Cause Noble Cause is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 2,470
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Woah, you have really outdone yourself with this one. You say there is "zero evidence". Did you forget that eyewitness testimony is "evidence". I thought you were in law enforcement? Didn't they teach you that your first day at the academy? You are beginning to sound more like a Russian troll. The witness is a college professor, a solid citizen, and an academically recognized author.

Here's the thing about eyewitness testimony; you don't have to remember every single detail for your testimony to be valid. You don't have to remember what color socks the assailant was wearing, or whether the robber was wearing cowboy boots.

As for your reliance on the other person in the room, are you telling me that a person who has written extensively about his blackout drinking in high school and who the victim testified had been drinking heavily is anything close to reliable when saying that something "DIDN'T HAPPEN"?

About the lateness of the accusation in the confirmation process that was because Dianne "Let's work with Trump" Feinstein was not going to take any action because she is about as corrupt as they come and she was just going to let Kavanaugh slide through. Others got wind of the letter and blew the lid off.

As for your last point, you would have us believe that 65 women spontaneously sent letters to Chuck Grassley saying that Kavanaugh did not rape them? Now that there is the biggest howler I have heard in a long time.

You are always good for a laugh.

By the way, the Republicans managed to discredit Anita Hill and get Clarence Thomas confirmed. If they try that again there may be a serious backlash in the midterms.

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.


Noble
  #330  
Old 09-18-2018, 7:15 PM
IVC's Avatar
IVC IVC is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Temecula
Posts: 14,028
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Here's the thing about eyewitness testimony; you don't have to remember every single detail for your testimony to be valid. You don't have to remember what color socks the assailant was wearing, or whether the robber was wearing cowboy boots.
Here is another thing about ANY testimony - there must be either a crime or a civil case. Once the statute of limitation has passed, there is absolutely nothing to testify about.

The whole point is that FBI has nothing to investigate, DA has no crime to charge with, Ford has no civil case, Congress has nothing to work with...

(All of this stands even IF Kavanaugh admitted to raping her, let alone having an admitted floozie, who was drunk at the time and can't remember anything, trying to create a delay by claiming that he "touched her.")
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
  #331  
Old 09-18-2018, 7:17 PM
IVC's Avatar
IVC IVC is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Temecula
Posts: 14,028
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

To summarize, this is all "Ford vs. Chevy."

Except Ford is a Yugo in this case.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
  #332  
Old 09-18-2018, 7:28 PM
Foulball's Avatar
Foulball Foulball is offline
It smells in here...
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 2,639
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Offwidth View Post
I am somewhat new here, was this Carlos fellow always as deranged? What is he doing at 2A/forum? Trolling?
Yes, no idea, yes
__________________
The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves. - George Washington

The autumn wind is a Raider, pillaging just for fun, he’ll knock you ‘round and upside down and laugh when he’s conquered and won.
  #333  
Old 09-18-2018, 7:28 PM
Citadelgrad87's Avatar
Citadelgrad87 Citadelgrad87 is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,510
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Woah, you have really outdone yourself with this one. You say there is "zero evidence". Did you forget that eyewitness testimony is "evidence". I thought you were in law enforcement? Didn't they teach you that your first day at the academy? You are beginning to sound more like a Russian troll. The witness is a college professor, a solid citizen, and an academically recognized author.

Here's the thing about eyewitness testimony; you don't have to remember every single detail for your testimony to be valid. You don't have to remember what color socks the assailant was wearing, or whether the robber was wearing cowboy boots.

As for your reliance on the other person in the room, are you telling me that a person who has written extensively about his blackout drinking in high school and who the victim testified had been drinking heavily is anything close to reliable when saying that something "DIDN'T HAPPEN"?

About the lateness of the accusation in the confirmation process that was because Dianne "Let's work with Trump" Feinstein was not going to take any action because she is about as corrupt as they come and she was just going to let Kavanaugh slide through. Others got wind of the letter and blew the lid off.

As for your last point, you would have us believe that 65 women spontaneously sent letters to Chuck Grassley saying that Kavanaugh did not rape them? Now that there is the biggest howler I have heard in a long time.

You are always good for a laugh.

By the way, the Republicans managed to discredit Anita Hill and get Clarence Thomas confirmed. If they try that again there may be a serious backlash in the midterms.
Holy self absorbed cherry picking bloviation
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by el chivo View Post
I don't need to think at all..
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjsig View Post
You are talking to someone who already won this lame conversation, not a brick a wall. Too bad you don't realize it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lear60man View Post
My transvestite analogy stands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterfern View Post
Didn't realize. I try not to be political.
XXXXXXXXXXX
  #334  
Old 09-18-2018, 7:31 PM
Citadelgrad87's Avatar
Citadelgrad87 Citadelgrad87 is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,510
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRICKSTER View Post
She is making a claim/accusation about something that supposedly happened decades ago. There is zero evidence to substantiate the claim. But you have no problem with the guilty till proven innocent lynch mob that are using this to ruin a man's life. Just more proof that it is liberals that believe in facist ideology. Now go ahead, spread lies and troll on. It's all you are good for.
No, far more transparent than that.

Hes a hypocrite. This suits him, so its guilty and cannot be proven innocent.

But only because hes a leftist nevertrumper.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by el chivo View Post
I don't need to think at all..
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjsig View Post
You are talking to someone who already won this lame conversation, not a brick a wall. Too bad you don't realize it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lear60man View Post
My transvestite analogy stands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterfern View Post
Didn't realize. I try not to be political.
XXXXXXXXXXX
  #335  
Old 09-18-2018, 7:52 PM
tenemae's Avatar
tenemae tenemae is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Somewhere Near LA
Posts: 514
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
The witness is a college professor, a solid citizen, and an academically recognized author.
A Psychology professor: a profession that leans heavily female and heavily liberal
At Palo Alto University: From wikipedia: "Palo Alto University offers two undergraduate degree programs (Bachelor of Science in Psychology and Social Action and Bachelor of Science in Business Psychology)". Notice how it's not just pstchology, it's psychology and social action. What's that mean? Let's look at the coursework:
Psychology of Gender
Cross Cultural Psychology
Cultural Anthropology
Philosophy of Ethics [i.e, critical theory and postmodernism]
Ethics Identity and Social Stratification

The chances this C is a nevertrumper is 99%: and remember their motto: By any means necessary

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Here's the thing about eyewitness testimony; you don't have to remember every single detail for your testimony to be valid. You don't have to remember what color socks the assailant was wearing, or whether the robber was wearing cowboy boots.
She doesn't "remember" the F'n YEAR
  #336  
Old 09-19-2018, 1:30 AM
HibikiR HibikiR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: LA County
Posts: 1,503
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Woah, you have really outdone yourself with this one. You say there is "zero evidence". Did you forget that eyewitness testimony is "evidence". I thought you were in law enforcement? Didn't they teach you that your first day at the academy? You are beginning to sound more like a Russian troll. The witness is a college professor, a solid citizen, and an academically recognized author.
And how many people have been put away on a single eyewitness testimony alone?

(Or more specifically, flimsy testimony that lacks concrete details like the year of the alleged crime)

Any decent defense attorney would put the whole solid citizen thing away in a singe objection (being a solid citizen has no connection to having a good memory), so yeah, you need more evidence to prove that the recollection is true.

Last edited by HibikiR; 09-19-2018 at 1:36 AM..
  #337  
Old 09-19-2018, 4:25 AM
bababoris bababoris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,103
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default BRETT KAVANAUGH July 2018 SCOTUS nomination thread - please use this one

Feinstein On Kavanaugh Accuser: 'I Can't Say That Everything Is Truthful'

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...thful-n2520256


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #338  
Old 09-19-2018, 6:03 AM
bababoris bababoris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,103
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

Chuck Grassley To Proceed To Confirm Kavanaugh!

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=137201




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #339  
Old 09-19-2018, 6:20 AM
Dirtlaw Dirtlaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 128
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default One Person Can Determine the Fate of the Supreme Court

It's not hard to find at least one person who will say anything that you want them to say. There are people who say the Holocaust didn't take place. There are people who say Jesus Christ is not God. And there are people who say we didn't land on the moon.


So, as it seems to stand now, there is not a single nominee to the Supreme Court who can't be "taken out." If both parties play this game to its logical conclusion all future appointments can be blocked. Does that mean the Supreme Court will eventually die out?
  #340  
Old 09-19-2018, 7:02 AM
RozaShanina's Avatar
RozaShanina RozaShanina is offline
Formerly carlosdanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 516
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citadelgrad87 View Post
Holy self absorbed cherry picking bloviation
I guess they don't teach logic at that finishing school for fine Southern boys you attended. Suggest you take a logic course at a community college. That way you won't have to just post insults and bombast and can actually contribute to the discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRICKSTER View Post
She is making a claim/accusation about something that supposedly happened decades ago. There is zero evidence to substantiate the claim. But you have no problem with the guilty till proven innocent lynch mob that are using this to ruin a man's life. Just more proof that it is liberals that believe in facist ideology. Now go ahead, spread lies and troll on. It's all you are good for.
Sorry, I outed you. Who would have known. I am sure it is difficult for Kavanaugh to remember what happened 35 years ago especially since he has trouble remembering anything from his time serving in the Bush administration. All you got is bluster. Bye.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble Cause View Post
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.


Noble
Not saying that Kavanaugh is guilty. Just saying that these are serious charges from a credible witness. As your Dear Leader himself said "At the same time, we want to go through a process. We want to make sure everything is perfect, everything is just right."
__________________
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.”


― Joseph Heller, Catch 22

Last edited by RozaShanina; 09-19-2018 at 7:15 AM..
  #341  
Old 09-19-2018, 7:29 AM
RozaShanina's Avatar
RozaShanina RozaShanina is offline
Formerly carlosdanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 516
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

If there is nothing to her allegations why is Mark Judge refusing to testify?

Without even being asked.
__________________
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.”


― Joseph Heller, Catch 22

Last edited by RozaShanina; 09-19-2018 at 7:34 AM..
  #342  
Old 09-19-2018, 7:47 AM
Dan_Eastvale's Avatar
Dan_Eastvale Dan_Eastvale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,207
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bababoris View Post
Chuck Grassley To Proceed To Confirm Kavanaugh!

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=137201




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sad to see our long time Utah Senator Hatch retire....
He also saw through the BS in Anita Hill's shenanigans in the Thomas nomination..

Unfortunately he will be replaced with Rino Romney..
  #343  
Old 09-19-2018, 8:04 AM
wireless's Avatar
wireless wireless is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,782
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Not saying that Kavanaugh is guilty. Just saying that these are serious charges from a credible witness. As your Dear Leader himself said "At the same time, we want to go through a process. We want to make sure everything is perfect, everything is just right."
Please explain what makes her credible.
  #344  
Old 09-19-2018, 8:06 AM
TRICKSTER's Avatar
TRICKSTER TRICKSTER is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Contra Costa County
Posts: 12,222
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
If there is nothing to her allegations why is Mark Judge refusing to testify?

Without even being asked.
Why is the supposed victim refusing to testify?
Could it be that she is afraid to make the accusation under oath?
Why does her story reportedly not match what she told her therapist, yet you call her credible?
Since you believe that simply stating something is evidence, Kavanaugh has stated under oath that nothing like this ever happened, Judge has stated it never happened. Using your "logic" the proponderence of "evidence" indicates that it never happened.

You may now continue with your facist inspired guilty until proven innocent trolling.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Weiner is in jail for doing much less than Kavanaugh or your Dear Leader Trump have done and they are walking around free.


NRA Benefactor Member

Police brutality? Visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRd5oucG114 to learn more about "isolated incidents"

Last edited by TRICKSTER; 09-19-2018 at 8:09 AM..
  #345  
Old 09-19-2018, 8:07 AM
IVC's Avatar
IVC IVC is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Temecula
Posts: 14,028
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
Not saying that Kavanaugh is guilty. Just saying that these are serious charges from a credible witness.
What crime do charges allege? What is the statute of limitations on those non-existing crimes? What is the credibility of a 15 year old witness who lived a party life and can't remember even the most basic details?

At this point it's very simple - she gets to be heard and testify under oath, or she is considered a liar planted by the Democrats and the process goes on.

The best part is that the accuser sent her letter long time ago and had time to prepare, but it was Feinstein (a Democrat) who ran the clock on the testimony, so Republicans won't even get blamed for not giving her and Feinstein more time.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
  #346  
Old 09-19-2018, 8:09 AM
rplaw rplaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 524
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
I guess they don't teach logic at that finishing school for fine Southern boys you attended. Suggest you take a logic course at a community college. That way you won't have to just post insults and bombast and can actually contribute to the discussion.



Sorry, I outed you. Who would have known. I am sure it is difficult for Kavanaugh to remember what happened 35 years ago especially since he has trouble remembering anything from his time serving in the Bush administration. All you got is bluster. Bye.



Not saying that Kavanaugh is guilty. Just saying that these are serious charges from a credible witness. As your Dear Leader himself said "At the same time, we want to go through a process. We want to make sure everything is perfect, everything is just right."
You fail to see that in the court of public opinion, the allegation was made, the charges leveled, and the EVIDENCE failed to prove the offense. Instead you hold to the weird idea that all that is required is an allegation and that no defense is sufficient to defeat it. (Credible? Her allegation contradicts her supporting evidence. That's not "credible" by any stretch. An accuser has the right to make the charge AND to be listened to. That DOESN'T MEAN she has the right to be believed or not be skeptically questioned about it. It's HER allegation, she has the obligation to support it BEYOND the making of it. She failed to do so.)

Now we wonder "why" this happened? To understand that, we have to turn to the purpose of the allegation. Underhandedly, it's two fold and you cannot see that either.

On the one hand, it's about the accusation itself; that Kavanaugh is a sexual predator. What we have in the way of evidence is a sparse accusation devoid of support or facts from the accuser beyond the allegation itself. The supporting documents (notes from her therapist) show different details that what the accuser is alleging now. Her own words, now and in the past, refute her allegation. As does the witness she alleges was present. Verdict: The allegation is false based on evidence.

Now, onward to the other hand. The allegation is also about smearing Kavanaugh's character. In essence, it's a question about; "WHY in the world would a progressive country like the USA allow someone like him to sit on our highest court?"

Unfortunately, what you've done is forget about the first part. The part where there needs to be PROOF the accusation is real before we get to the second part questioning whether we should allow a sexual predator to sit on the Supreme Court bench. IF there is no basis in fact to support the allegation, there is no question as to whether Kavanaugh is a sexual predator or not. Because there is no evidence that he IS, there is no question on his fitness to be a Supreme Court Justice. Without that question he is as qualified today as he was last month.

That sir, is LOGIC, not rhetoric.
__________________
Some random thoughts:

Evil doesn't only come in black.

Life is like a discount bakery. Usually everything is just what you ordered. But, occasionally you come face to face with an unexpected fruitcake. Surprise!

There is no "I" in Team; no "Me" in sports; no "You" in life. However, there's a ton of "Wheeeeee!" on roller coasters.
  #347  
Old 09-19-2018, 8:18 AM
IVC's Avatar
IVC IVC is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Temecula
Posts: 14,028
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
If there is nothing to her allegations why is Mark Judge refusing to testify?
Why in the world would he testify when the whole charade is imploding on its own?

You'd have better case asking why the accuser doesn't want to show up in Congress, tell her story and be cross-examined under oath? She is the one claiming it happened...
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
  #348  
Old 09-19-2018, 8:20 AM
rplaw rplaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 524
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlosdanger View Post
If there is nothing to her allegations why is Mark Judge refusing to testify?

Without even being asked.
I'm refusing to testify.

I wasn't asked either.
__________________
Some random thoughts:

Evil doesn't only come in black.

Life is like a discount bakery. Usually everything is just what you ordered. But, occasionally you come face to face with an unexpected fruitcake. Surprise!

There is no "I" in Team; no "Me" in sports; no "You" in life. However, there's a ton of "Wheeeeee!" on roller coasters.
  #349  
Old 09-19-2018, 9:25 AM
Offwidth Offwidth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 152
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Anybody questioning Kavaunaugh character, with decades of solid evidence to it being impeccable from hundreds of people who ever interacted with him, based on this induced memories story is an imbecile with an agenda.
No ifs or buts about it. Even suspending disbelief and assuming he once got drunk and was near a girl.

Karma will bite liberals back. It always happened.
  #350  
Old 09-19-2018, 9:34 AM
bababoris bababoris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,103
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

Meanwhile in bizzaro world a go fund me fund to keep the accuser safe from....
https://www.fastcompany.com/90239112...-death-threats


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #351  
Old 09-19-2018, 10:33 AM
Dan_Eastvale's Avatar
Dan_Eastvale Dan_Eastvale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,207
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bababoris View Post
Meanwhile in bizzaro world a go fund me fund to keep the accuser safe from....
https://www.fastcompany.com/90239112...-death-threats


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hmmm, and we can guess who has control over that money
  #352  
Old 09-19-2018, 11:00 AM
Kevfin's Avatar
Kevfin Kevfin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: California
Posts: 287
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bababoris View Post
Meanwhile in bizzaro world a go fund me fund to keep the accuser safe from....
https://www.fastcompany.com/90239112...-death-threats

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As more liberal clowns join this circus the show is going to get even more bizarre.
The head clowns - Schumer and Feinstain don't care about Dr. Ford or her well being. If they did, this would have been handled weeks ago without all the antics.
__________________
The race is not won to the swift or the strong, but to the one who endures until the end.

Safety Rule #1:
1) Treat all tweakers like they are loaded
  #353  
Old 09-19-2018, 11:31 AM
dogrunner dogrunner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: E/Central Fl
Posts: 100
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Ahhh, the Citadel v. Berkley..............now where doth credibility lie most comfortably?
  #354  
Old 09-19-2018, 11:59 AM
RozaShanina's Avatar
RozaShanina RozaShanina is offline
Formerly carlosdanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 516
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wireless View Post
Please explain what makes her credible.
Read the thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRICKSTER View Post
Why is the supposed victim refusing to testify?
Could it be that she is afraid to make the accusation under oath?
Why does her story reportedly not match what she told her therapist, yet you call her credible?
Since you believe that simply stating something is evidence, Kavanaugh has stated under oath that nothing like this ever happened, Judge has stated it never happened. Using your "logic" the proponderence of "evidence" indicates that it never happened.

You may now continue with your facist inspired guilty until proven innocent trolling.
The whataboutism is strong with this one.

Why is the victim refusing to testify? Ah because she has already been doxxed. Her address, phone number, cell phone, husband's name, names and ages of her children. And she has been receiving death threats such that she has had to go into hiding. So much for the tolerant, free speech loving Right.

It bothers you that Dr. Ford will not testify under oath but not that Judge will not testify under oath? Hypocrisy much.

Was accusing me of "facism" rather than "fascism" a freudian slip?

Quote:
Originally Posted by IVC View Post
What crime do charges allege? What is the statute of limitations on those non-existing crimes? What is the credibility of a 15 year old witness who lived a party life and can't remember even the most basic details?

At this point it's very simple - she gets to be heard and testify under oath, or she is considered a liar planted by the Democrats and the process goes on.

The best part is that the accuser sent her letter long time ago and had time to prepare, but it was Feinstein (a Democrat) who ran the clock on the testimony, so Republicans won't even get blamed for not giving her and Feinstein more time.
The crime is attempted rape and there is no statute of limitations on rape in Maryland. Thanks for asking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rplaw View Post
You fail to see that in the court of public opinion, the allegation was made, the charges leveled, and the EVIDENCE failed to prove the offense. Instead you hold to the weird idea that all that is required is an allegation and that no defense is sufficient to defeat it. (Credible? Her allegation contradicts her supporting evidence. That's not "credible" by any stretch. An accuser has the right to make the charge AND to be listened to. That DOESN'T MEAN she has the right to be believed or not be skeptically questioned about it. It's HER allegation, she has the obligation to support it BEYOND the making of it. She failed to do so.)

Now we wonder "why" this happened? To understand that, we have to turn to the purpose of the allegation. Underhandedly, it's two fold and you cannot see that either.

On the one hand, it's about the accusation itself; that Kavanaugh is a sexual predator. What we have in the way of evidence is a sparse accusation devoid of support or facts from the accuser beyond the allegation itself. The supporting documents (notes from her therapist) show different details that what the accuser is alleging now. Her own words, now and in the past, refute her allegation. As does the witness she alleges was present. Verdict: The allegation is false based on evidence.

Now, onward to the other hand. The allegation is also about smearing Kavanaugh's character. In essence, it's a question about; "WHY in the world would a progressive country like the USA allow someone like him to sit on our highest court?"

Unfortunately, what you've done is forget about the first part. The part where there needs to be PROOF the accusation is real before we get to the second part questioning whether we should allow a sexual predator to sit on the Supreme Court bench. IF there is no basis in fact to support the allegation, there is no question as to whether Kavanaugh is a sexual predator or not. Because there is no evidence that he IS, there is no question on his fitness to be a Supreme Court Justice. Without that question he is as qualified today as he was last month.

That sir, is LOGIC, not rhetoric.
Wrong. That is not "logic" it is supposition. Your assumption is that because her later recollection differs in some minor details from what she told the therapist, she must be lying. Talk to someone who has been through trauma, or combat, or some other catastrophic event about their memory. Also what Kavanaugh is accused of is not being a sexual predator but an attempted rapist. Donald Trump is the one accused of being a sexual predator.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevfin View Post
As more liberal clowns join this circus the show is going to get even more bizarre.
The head clowns - Schumer and Feinstain don't care about Dr. Ford or her well being. If they did, this would have been handled weeks ago without all the antics.
Agreed. The most profound comment on this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan_Eastvale View Post
Hmmm, and we can guess who has control over that money
Soros? Doesn't he control everything?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Offwidth View Post
Anybody questioning Kavaunaugh character, with decades of solid evidence to it being impeccable from hundreds of people who ever interacted with him, based on this induced memories story is an imbecile with an agenda.
No ifs or buts about it. Even suspending disbelief and assuming he once got drunk and was near a girl.

Karma will bite liberals back. It always happened.
Kavanaugh has a history of lying under oath: http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news...ring-former-u/

That will come back to bite him on the b***.
__________________
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.”


― Joseph Heller, Catch 22
  #355  
Old 09-19-2018, 12:42 PM
bababoris bababoris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,103
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

Kavanaugh has a history of lying under oath: http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news...ring-former-u/



That will come back to bite him on the b***.[/QUOTE]


That article is pretty damning. I encourage everyone to read it and provide feedback.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #356  
Old 09-19-2018, 1:01 PM
Offwidth Offwidth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 152
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bababoris View Post
That article is pretty damning. I encourage everyone to read it and provide feedback.
That article is a load of unadulterated opinionated bullcrap. Anybody giving it any weight is an idiot.
  #357  
Old 09-19-2018, 1:10 PM
bababoris bababoris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,103
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Offwidth View Post
That article is a load of unadulterated opinionated bullcrap. Anybody giving it any weight is an idiot.


Thanks for the mature feedback
So emails contradicting sworn testimony is considered unadulterated opinionated bullcrap?

I would think we conservatives are better than that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #358  
Old 09-19-2018, 1:12 PM
mit31 mit31 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 208
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

The fact I am reading it on the Jackson Free Press and not CNN tends to tell me it isn't going to be very damning.

Lets see.

1. Claims that he lied when he said he was "not one of the judicial nominees I was primarily handling." Based on two whole emails that mention his name. During a contentious one YEAR nomination process. TWO emails. Do you think if he was fully involved there may be more than two? Those emails came out last week and have already been ignored as irrelevant.

2. The Miranda theft of Democrat papers. "He denied any involvement." It seems pretty clear that there was no indication he knew they were stolen when he received them. Another nothingburger that was discussed in 2006 and again last week, and has again already been dismissed as irrelevant.

None of this is new, or news. None of it is damning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bababoris View Post
Kavanaugh has a history of lying under oath: http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news...ring-former-u/



That will come back to bite him on the b***.

That article is pretty damning. I encourage everyone to read it and provide feedback.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]

Last edited by mit31; 09-19-2018 at 1:16 PM..
  #359  
Old 09-19-2018, 1:18 PM
bababoris bababoris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,103
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mit31 View Post
The fact I am reading it on the Jackson Free Press and not CNN tends to tell me it isn't going to be very damning.



Lets see.



1. Claims that he lied when he said he was "not one of the judicial nominees I was primarily handling." Based on two whole emails that mention his name. During a contentious one YEAR nomination process. TWO emails. Do you think if he was fully involved there may be more than two? Those emails came out last week and have already been ignored as irrelevant.



2. The Miranda theft of Democrat papers. "He denied any involvement." It seems pretty clear that there was no indication he knew they were stolen when he received them. Another nothingburger that was discussed in 2006 and again last week, and has again already been dismissed as irrelevant.



None of this is new, or news. None of it is damning.









That article is pretty damning. I encourage everyone to read it and provide feedback.







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/QUOTE]



Thanks for that. Makes sense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #360  
Old 09-19-2018, 1:23 PM
Offwidth Offwidth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 152
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Oh, Carlos got a circle jerk partner.

And no, trolling does not warrant “mature” feedback. I reserve it to people who can grasp it.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.