|
California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2014, a Firearm Ownership Record to be submitted, as specified, to the Department of Justice for every firearm an individual owns, with prescribed exceptions, including firearms purchased from a licensed firearms dealer and documented by a Dealers’ Record of Sale transaction and assault weapons registered with the department. The bill would authorize the department to charge a fee of up to $19 per transaction for the submission of the Firearm Ownership Record.
So does this mean I would have to register my Mossberg 500? Also what about my Handguns? They are already registered with the DOJ when I bought it. |
#122
|
||||
|
||||
Here are the exemptions in the original text of the bill:
27566. (a) On and after July 1, 2014, a Firearm Ownership Record shall be submitted by prepaid mail or delivered in person to the Department of Justice for every firearm an individual owns or possesses. (b) The following firearms are exempt from subdivision (a): (1) Handguns purchased from a licensed firearms dealer and documented by a Dealers’ Record of Sale (DROS) transaction on and after January 1, 1991. (2) Rifles without detachable magazines and shotguns purchased prior to January 1, 2014. (3) Assault weapons registered with the department pursuant to Section 30900. (4) Firearms for which a Firearm Ownership Record has been previously filed by the current owner. (c) The department may charge a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the department for the reasonable costs of maintaining the Firearm Ownership Record program, but in no case more than nineteen dollars ($19) per transaction to process the Firearm Ownership Record. After the department establishes the fee amount, the department may adjust the fee amount annually as necessary to cover the reasonable costs of administering the program. The fees shall be deposited into the Dealers’ Record of Sale Special Account. Quote:
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
There will millions and millions of AWs in this state if this passes.
We all get to keep our stuff and do whatever we want with it. ANYTHING! The bad: Sales will no longer be available, for the children (literally) |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
They will check records and if its not registered you will be arrested
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
This is actually a pretty cool bill! It allows for millions to have AW's and prohibits many others for the ability to own weapons in common use. (nation wide common use)
My attorney went to school with Steinberg and was good friends with him. Looking forward to me talking to my lawyer about what is "friend" is doing. LOL Political suicide! |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Where do felons shop for clothes? I need a costume for an upcoming role..
__________________
I am a professional. I always aim true whether firing single rounds or full automatic. I know neither fatigue nor failure. I would take pride in my work but for one thing, I do not know my target. I am not the one that kills. That distinction belongs to the man who pulls my trigger. I am an assault rifle. My name is Kalashnikov.
DANGEROUS FREEDOM > PEACEFUL SLAVERY |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Its a good bill! OR maybe its a bad bill! Who am i to say? I'm nobody. |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Do what all great men would do: Tuck your head between your legs and kiss your *** goodbye. -Jake71 There's lots of players on the team. Not everyone gets to play "Quarterback". -CEDaytonaRydr |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
With any luck the courts would destroy this
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
The more 'Assault Weapons' owners in California, the better, right? Meaning that if this bill passes, there are now millions of AW owners....and so it is now 'common' to possess an 'AW' for lawful purposes, making it more likely the Ban will be struck down?
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
So long as the Ruger 10/22 and other common models are included in a ban the probability of a preliminary injunction is high in my opinion. This is based upon language already out there that the intent is to ban Assault Weapons yet new laws expand to encompass all semi-autos as Assault Weapons including those used for hunting such as the Browning BAR and those used for target shooting such as the Ruger 10/22.
It is my opinion that a challenge will be pre-empted by borrowing from Feinstein and creating an exempt list of sporting and hunting rifles like her bill does. We're seeing the first draft of the bill right now and it's easier to maintain a list of what is allowed than what isn't. Clearly the reason for including rimfire I the ban is to prevent 5.56mm lowers with rimfire adaptor blocks and uppers from being sold because they can be converted back to 5.56mm with a different upper. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
If this bill goes through, I will have to register my pig hunting gun as an assault weapon- it holds 4 rounds of 44 mag. No other mags available for it at all.
__________________
Wanted- Dillon XL650 blue press parts/conversions |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
To those of you wondering why they're going after .22 rimfire: its not about banning Ruger 10/22s and stuff like the M&P-1522. It's about preventing manufacuters from bringing in stripped lowers with a .22lr roll mark and selling AR-15s as .22s with conversion kits installed that allow them to be converted back to 5.56mm by buying an upper online.
As written this law forever prevents stripped lowers from comming back into the state because even stripped they can accept a detachable magazine. |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Actually, I suspect they havent thought that far ahead. IMHO the fact that they are going after .22 is a consequence of the .22lr AW look-alikes; the GSG series, the Colt and HK 22s, etc. Its the same mentality behind the desire to ban 10 rd mags that look like 30 rd mags.
They a. cant stand the sight of them and b. dont want people to have guns that look "cool", no matter their actual performance. It goes to the heart of the new Anti gun philosophy of making guns socially unacceptable. I think the fact that 10-22s, and a whole host of others are now AW is just a byproduct. And, yes this is a first draft. Many changes could occur. I will say that the problem with Feinstein's bill (or one of the problems anyways) is that by calling out certain guns as "sporting" and exempt, you have created an arbitrary and capricious standard. If a Browning BAR is exempted, but a Binelli R1 is not, where is the distinction? I can't see this bill getting any better than hers was. The whole thing is just a constitutional nightmare. Our problem is that until we get up to the Supreme court we are unlikely to get a favorable ruling. |
#146
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Is this really the best way to use our resources? To make non-violent law abiding citizens into criminals. Today, violent criminals are being let out of prison due to overcrowding and they want to put more non-violent criminals into prison?
They took the word "illegal" out of "illegal immigrant" and want to add the word "illegal" to "legal gun owner". Even Canada came to their senses when they determined that registration was very costly with very little benefit. |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Personally I take more offense to this than SB-47. At least there was some shread of logic in SB-47 in that the intent of SB-23 was to ban AR, AK, FAL series, etc and not semi-auto "sporting arms". Banning a Ruger 10/22 youth rifle as an assault weapon has NO logic whatsoever. How do you explain to your son or daughter his/her rifle is now an assault weapon and since they're under 18 they can't register it and therefore may never own it.
|
#150
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#151
|
|||
|
|||
I looked at my purchases in the early 1980's, even thou I filled out that CA Index Card sized 4 or 5 part form, the one that required you to press with all your might to imprint on the last copy, it appears I did not pay a separate fee on the invoice and have no idea if that was supposed to be registration or if the FFL had to pay a fee.
__________________
"The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez Last edited by Californio; 02-22-2013 at 11:22 AM.. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The antis are thinking 10 plus years in advance with these proposals.They want everything which can launch a bullet in CA documented in some fashion.Tube,lever,bolt,semi auto, and probably Airsoft at this rate. I'll let you figure out why they'd want that.
__________________
The more prohibitions you have, the less virtuous people will be. The more subsidies you have, the less self reliant people will be. -Lao-Tzu, Tau Te Ching. 479 BCE The 1911 may have been in wars for 100 years, but Masetro Bartolomeo Beretta was arming the world 400 years before John Browning was ever a wet dream. |
#154
|
||||
|
||||
Does the proposed bill apply to non-semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines?
__________________
pMcW |
#156
|
||||
|
||||
I'm sure it will also be a crime to not be vegan soon, so you won't "need" such an assault rifle to kill pigs anyway. And what's with that high powered sniper scope on top?
|
#157
|
|||
|
|||
The law applies to any semi-automatic centerfire or rimfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine.
Sadly this means the Browning BAR hunting rifle and Benelli R-1. Both of these are beautiful modern hunting rifles that should never be considered "Assault Weapons". Heck they don't even make magazines bigger than 5 rounds for them!!!!! |
#158
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
OPSEC!! |
#159
|
||||
|
||||
So, according to this new bill,
since my old Springfield-Stevens Model 87-A with a tube-fed magazine which can accept up to 15 (Pre-ban BTW) rounds of .22 LR, .22 Short and .22 Long is an "assault weapon"...
__________________
Do what all great men would do: Tuck your head between your legs and kiss your *** goodbye. -Jake71 There's lots of players on the team. Not everyone gets to play "Quarterback". -CEDaytonaRydr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|