Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2201  
Old 01-09-2018, 1:39 PM
phdo's Avatar
phdo phdo is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,850
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cockedandglocked View Post
Someone forgot to give Librarian the latest firmware update

Sometimes I think Lib is a bot. I don't know how he knows so much information and regurgitate it at will. He's probably a T-1000 and CGN is Skynet. They probably created him to store data and to maintain the site.
__________________
WTB:
2.5" Smith & Wesson Model 19
2.5" Smith & Wesson Model 66
4" Smith & Wesson Model 19
3.5" Smith & Wesson Model 29
Marlin 1894C
Colt Python
Colt Series 70
Sig Sauer P228
HK USP9c
Reply With Quote
  #2202  
Old 01-09-2018, 1:50 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 15,917
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phdo View Post
Sometimes I think Lib is a bot. I don't know how he knows so much information and regurgitate it at will. He's probably a T-1000 and CGN is Skynet. They probably created him to store data and to maintain the site.
Of course he is. You didn’t think he was human did you?

It’s the CGN software alert monitor/moderator
Reply With Quote
  #2203  
Old 01-09-2018, 2:42 PM
OCRebote78's Avatar
OCRebote78 OCRebote78 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Remudadero
Posts: 278
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phdo View Post
Sometimes I think Lib is a bot. I don't know how he knows so much information and regurgitate it at will. He's probably a T-1000 and CGN is Skynet. They probably created him to store data and to maintain the site.
He/She might need an update here pretty soon based on the last comment.
Reply With Quote
  #2204  
Old 01-10-2018, 8:05 PM
oc16's Avatar
oc16 oc16 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orange
Posts: 716
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

even if the librarian is a bot he/she does a good job of moderating the forums.
__________________
retreat! we must go comrade we will fight again another day.
Reply With Quote
  #2205  
Old 01-12-2018, 8:59 PM
caliguy93's Avatar
caliguy93 caliguy93 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: North Koreafornia
Posts: 419
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Or maybe we got an Easter egg from the developers about a future soon to be released update. Maybe librarian is right and we will be waiting for SCOTUS to make a decision except that feature was not due to be released under this version of Librarian.

Ya know, kind of like when an early version of the next iPhone is spotted in public
Reply With Quote
  #2206  
Old 01-13-2018, 10:47 AM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 7,444
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

While I'm sure Librarian appreciates the appreciation, I'm also sure they enjoy threads staying On Topic even more....
__________________
Never mistake being delusional for being optimistic.

225+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

KnifeRights.org/images/KRbanner_468x60-1.gif
Reply With Quote
  #2207  
Old 01-13-2018, 2:46 PM
Solidsnake87's Avatar
Solidsnake87 Solidsnake87 is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 4,127
iTrader: 22 / 100%
Default

Its seriously been nearly a year since orals and no decision reached or movement made?
__________________
Quote:
Replying to craigslist for casual encounters is like pokemon with STDs. Gotta catch em all
Reply With Quote
  #2208  
Old 01-13-2018, 5:05 PM
BCA142's Avatar
BCA142 BCA142 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Corruptifornia
Posts: 609
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solidsnake87 View Post
Its seriously been nearly a year since orals and no decision reached or movement made?
2nd Amendment takes a back seat. Don't worry it's only a constitutional right issue.
__________________
Dec. 15, 1791
"The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed" EVER!!!!!

NRA Life Member: Patron
Calguns Supporter
Firearms Policy Coalition Supporter
Reply With Quote
  #2209  
Old 01-14-2018, 8:05 AM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 389
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I hope that the two conservative judges finished the majority opinion a long time ago, then they gave it to the one liberal judge so she can write her dissent, and she's dragging her feat and doesn't know what to write ..
Reply With Quote
  #2210  
Old 01-14-2018, 3:49 PM
TruOil TruOil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 149
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

10 months really isn't that long for the Ninth. Give it another 6.
Reply With Quote
  #2211  
Old 01-17-2018, 4:50 AM
DaMeMe DaMeMe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 49
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solidsnake87 View Post
Its seriously been nearly a year since orals and no decision reached or movement made?
To be honest it's going to take years before we can have that unlawful roster list removed even after the ninth circuit court decision. Think about what happened with the conceal carry case in CA. It has been years since that lawsuit was announced and we've yet to receive a conclusion. Let say we are lucky enough to get the 3 panel judge in the ninth circuit court to say the roster list is unlawful. Politicians in CA would most likely say that decision was wrong which would then lead the ninth circuit court to reevaluate the case but this time with more judges that are most likely say the roster list is lawful. We would then have to take this lawsuit to the supreme court and we all know how long that's going to take especially since the supreme court isn't taking any 2nd amendment related cases right now.

Last edited by DaMeMe; 01-17-2018 at 4:54 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2212  
Old 01-17-2018, 7:03 AM
Califpatriot Califpatriot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 109
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaMeMe View Post
Think about what happened with the conceal carry case in CA. It has been years since that lawsuit was announced and we've yet to receive a conclusion.
Who's going to break the news to him?
Reply With Quote
  #2213  
Old 01-17-2018, 11:42 AM
champu's Avatar
champu champu is offline
NRA Member, CRPA Member,
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Redondo Beach
Posts: 522
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaMeMe View Post
To be honest it's going to take years before we can have that unlawful roster list removed even after the ninth circuit court decision.
Just to pick at a nit here, there’s a difference between something being unlawful/illegal and something being unconstitutional.

If voters or the legislature pass a ballot measure or a bill respectively, and required procedures were followed, then constitutional or otherwise it isn’t illegal/unlawful.

Now, Cal DOJ maintains/administers the roster and they have adopted regulations for doing so. While it is possible (i.e. not nonsensical) to find something illegal with how they administer the roster (e.g. adding the Armatix to the roster a few years back may have been illegal) that is generally not what is being argued in these court cases.
Reply With Quote
  #2214  
Old 01-17-2018, 12:04 PM
Ubermcoupe's Avatar
Ubermcoupe Ubermcoupe is offline
🇺🇸 Jack-Booted Gov Thug
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: This information has been redacted in accordance with Title 18 U.S. Code § 798
Posts: 14,410
iTrader: 63 / 100%
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaMeMe View Post
To be honest it's going to take years before we can have that unlawful roster list removed even after the ninth circuit court decision. ...
"years" ... try decades - if at all (i.e. Peruta)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fizux View Post
Peña v. Cid [Cal. DOJ BoF]
Issue: Handgun Roster

...
4/30/2009 - Complaint.

Trial Court: E.D. Cal.
Case No.: 2:09-cv-01185
Docket: http://ia801400.us.archive.org/30/it...44.docket.html

...
__________________
Hauoli Makahiki Hou


-------
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.