Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2013, 1:17 PM
fizux's Avatar
fizux fizux is offline
Senior Member
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,540
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Davis v. City of Los Angeles (CCW policy)

Davis v. City of Los Angeles
Issue: Enforce prior consent decree in Assenza v. L.A. (1995) regarding CCW policy.

Current Status as of 3/24/2013: Fully briefed; oral arg date to be set by Court.

2/21/2014 - Appellant's citation of additional authority: Peruta.
2/10/2014 - Respondent's response to Amicus Brief.
12/30/2013 - Amicus filed by Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence.
12/6/2013 - Appellant's Reply Brief.
9/17/2013 - Respondent's Brief.
5/8/2013 - Appellant's Opening Brief (2nd Amend.).
5/31/2012 - Notice of Appeal.
5/18/2011 - Petition.

Trial Court: L.A. Superior Court
Case No.: BS131915
Docket: http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/civilcasesummarynet/ui/ (just need to enter Case No. above).

Appellate Court: Cal. App. - 2nd Dist.
Case No.: B241631
Docket: http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.g...doc_no=B241631

Links:
CGN discussion thread: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=432556
Michel & Assoc. Memo (May 2011).

Last edited by fizux; 03-24-2014 at 6:47 PM.. Reason: updates
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-09-2013, 4:33 PM
flyonwall flyonwall is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Was this Lu?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-09-2013, 8:15 PM
jello2594's Avatar
jello2594 jello2594 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 379
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

What is Lu?

This case is associated with Assenza vs. Los Angeles, and is being litigated by C. D. Michel and Associates.

Some of the plaintiffs may even be Calguns members!
__________________
[SIGPIC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2013, 8:23 PM
flyonwall flyonwall is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I thought that was the assenza continuation. Does chuck have 2?
CGF filed a case called Lu, though she was dismissed as a plaintiff.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2013, 8:33 PM
jello2594's Avatar
jello2594 jello2594 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 379
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Assenza v. LA and Davis v. LA are two separate cases. Very similar.
__________________
[SIGPIC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2013, 8:45 PM
flyonwall flyonwall is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Understood- but there was a case brought to enforce the assenza decree- is that Davis, or does chuck have two current LA case- and what about the CGF case against la?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-09-2013, 10:43 PM
monk's Avatar
monk monk is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,454
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Lu is suing because LASD requires people to apply and be denied in their respective cities.
__________________


NRA Member
SAF Member


Quote:
A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-10-2013, 5:02 AM
flyonwall flyonwall is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I think Lu was dismissed and it is just CGF as the plaintiff with msj's coming up but I can't find an update or case number.

So Davis is Assenza part 2 and is on appeal?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2013, 1:11 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fizux View Post
Davis v. City of Los Angeles
Issue: Enforce prior consent decree in Assenza v. L.A. (1995) regarding CCW policy.

Current Status as of 11/7/2013: Appellant's Reply Brief due 12/6/2013

<snip>

Appellate Court: Cal. App. - 2nd Dist.
Case No.: B241631
Docket: http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.g...doc_no=B241631
Looks like this case was fully briefed as of the 6th. Next stop: oral arguments before the state court of appeals.

Last edited by Paladin; 12-16-2013 at 1:22 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-02-2014, 11:26 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyonwall View Post
Was this Lu?
These cases are against LAPD.

Lu is against LASD for requiring CCW applicants in issuing cities to get letters of denials from their CoP before applying w/the sheriff.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:26 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy