|
2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Schoepf v. Harris (DROS delays)
Schoepf v. Harris
Issue: Petition alleges that Cal. DOJ's policy of issuing DROS delay letters is unlawful; delays are only authorized by PC § 28220(e) for non-payment of DROS fees or if purchaser cannot be identified due to incomplete/incorrect info on the DROS application, and may delay only until correct application info/fees are submitted. Current Status: As of 3/24/2014 - Case complete. 11/12/2013 - Judgment entered for Defendants. 10/23/2013 - Writ Denied as Moot (given passage of AB 500) {good call, Tincon}. 9/24/2013 - Hearing continued to 10/23/2013. 8/1/2013 - Hearing continued to 9/24/2013 at 8:30am, Dept 51. 5/13/2013 - Answer filed. 4/11/2013 - Petition for Writ of Mandate filed & served. Trial Court: Cal. Super. Ct. - Fresno Case No.: 13CECG01132 Docket: http://banweb.co.fresno.ca.us/cprods...trpt_setup_idx (enter Case No.) Links: Wildhawker's thread: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=656150 PC § 28220: http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/28220.html CGF Wiki for this case: (none) CGF Wiki Litigation page: http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Li...st_and_Present Last edited by fizux; 03-24-2014 at 6:49 PM.. Reason: Updates |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
This case may be rendered moot by AB 500.
__________________
My posts may contain general information related to the law, however, THEY ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND I AM NOT A LAWYER. I recommend you consult a lawyer if you want legal advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship exists or will be formed between myself and any other person on the basis of these posts. Pronouns I may use (such as "you" and "your") do NOT refer to any particular person under any circumstance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|