Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > SPECIALTY FORUMS > Calguns LEOs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Calguns LEOs LEOs; chat, kibitz and relax. Non-LEOs; have a questions for a cop? Ask it here, in a CIVIL manner.

View Poll Results: Whats the most dangerous activity drivers partake in you observe?
Driving drunk and or high? 29 59.18%
Texting or reading emails? 18 36.73%
Holding phone while talking on it? 7 14.29%
Eating? 3 6.12%
Reading a book or map? 8 16.33%
Reaching back to smack your kids/spouse in the back seat 3 6.12%
Having sex? 13 26.53%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2012, 11:54 AM
bubbapug1's Avatar
bubbapug1 bubbapug1 is offline
Dazed & Confused
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South South OC
Posts: 6,531
iTrader: 260 / 100%
Default Whats more dangerous? Cell phone use or drunks driving

Based on what you see, what is the more dangerous activity drivers take part in??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2012, 12:26 PM
SoCalDep SoCalDep is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 906
iTrader: 22 / 100%
Default

Drunk drivers on cell phones...horrific.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2012, 12:33 PM
pdq_wizzard's Avatar
pdq_wizzard pdq_wizzard is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Member of the CA Quiters Club now Around Boise, ID
Posts: 3,558
iTrader: 50 / 100%
Default

I don't like drunk drivers, but at lest they are trying to drive (I'm not talking smashed but DUI by the law ~.09). those that are texting / sexting or reading a book are not trying to drive but kill me when I'm in my bike.

and we have the law to thank for the texting being more dangerous now than before.

sorry I'm not a LEO (didn't see it was in that form) let me know if I should delete. this is just what I have seen riding my motorcycle on the Sac freeways.
__________________
Q: What was the most positive result of the "Cash for Clunkers" program?
A: It took 95% of the Obama bumper stickers off the road.

Quote:
Originally Posted by M. Sage View Post
More what? More crazy?
You live in California. There's always more crazy. It's a renewable resource.

Last edited by pdq_wizzard; 09-20-2012 at 12:39 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2012, 9:00 PM
Ron-Solo's Avatar
Ron-Solo Ron-Solo is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ramblin' Man
Posts: 8,012
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

They are all dangerous, but a sober driver has a better chance at regaining control than a drunk/high driver.
__________________
LASD Retired
1978-2011




If You Heard The Shot, You Weren't The Target
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-20-2012, 9:29 PM
bubbapug1's Avatar
bubbapug1 bubbapug1 is offline
Dazed & Confused
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South South OC
Posts: 6,531
iTrader: 260 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalDep View Post
Drunk drivers on cell phones...horrific.
Yea, I should have had that as an option, but you can choose more than one from the list.

While I do think drunks are more dangerous individually, the shear number of texting causing issues now on the roads even exceeds the amount of old people who tend to make things a bit interesting. Texting has to be dealt with more forcefully to get people to stop doing it while driving. I am sure the civil liberties anti nanny state folks will now chime in...but driving is a privilage, and if you don't want to follow the rules you can walk.

Maybe the law could be texting is legal, however, so is shooting at texters from your car if they swerve into your lane. That would even up the odds.

I was on the 405 today and there was a big backup in the fast lane. As I worked my way around it lo and behold a lady was busy texting and doing 45 mph to maintain a safe interval for stopping, meanwhile all havoc was happening all around her.

Last edited by bubbapug1; 09-20-2012 at 11:29 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-20-2012, 10:03 PM
Triad's Avatar
Triad Triad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kern County, CA
Posts: 1,632
iTrader: 40 / 100%
Default

Seeing as how a drunk driver has almost killed me on the road, I will choose drunk driving.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2012, 12:13 AM
P5Ret P5Ret is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SF Ebay
Posts: 3,071
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Individually, probably a dui, but since there are more using cell phones in one manner or another it could be a toss up. The whole hands free law is a joke to begin with, it isn't holding the phone that causes the distraction it's the conversation. One thing it did do is make us all walk and drive around with something stuck in our ear so it looks like we are talking to ourselves all the time.
You missed the in dash video systems that I have seen people watching stuck in rush hour traffic.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2012, 12:42 AM
LAKings22's Avatar
LAKings22 LAKings22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North Hollywood
Posts: 1,648
iTrader: 33 / 100%
Default

Drunk driving
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2012, 2:15 PM
shy 7th shy 7th is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 529
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I think this is a Sharks vs. Bees discussion. They say "you're more likely to be sting by a bee than be bitten by a shark"... The thing is, when you do get bitten by a shark, it's really bad news.

So on one hand my sister was put in the hospital by a drunk driver. But that's the only one I have ever seen in my 15 years of driving.

On the other hand I see cell phoners drifting and correcting at least twice a day. Though they may not cause the kid of accident a drunk would, they're freakin everywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-22-2012, 4:32 PM
yzernie's Avatar
yzernie yzernie is offline
Vendor/Retailer
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oak Hills/Hesperia, Ca.
Posts: 5,195
iTrader: 548 / 100%
Default

No option for all of the above.
__________________
My Commercial Sales Ad >>> http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=257865

TinStarSupply@aol.com

The satisfaction of a job well done is to be the one who has done it
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-22-2012, 10:33 PM
bubbapug1's Avatar
bubbapug1 bubbapug1 is offline
Dazed & Confused
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South South OC
Posts: 6,531
iTrader: 260 / 100%
Default

you can choose all the options
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:44 AM
Cowboy T's Avatar
Cowboy T Cowboy T is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PAULestine, USA
Posts: 3,822
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Texters, book readers, and drunk drivers, in equal measure. Yapping on the cell phone is dangerous, yes, but when you're texting and/or reading your book, your eyes are actually off the road. Sober or not, if your eyes are not on the road, you won't even see the stopped car or pedestrian in front of you in order to self-correct. Boom, collision. Not good.

Drunk/high drivers, that should be obvious by now. Don't get behind the wheel in the first place.

Not saying any of the others are good or proper. I don't take cell phone calls when I'm driving; it can wait the few minutes needed to get to a safe stopping point. I've been almost broadsided more than once by cell-phone yappers and texters, and defensive driving has (so far) gotten me out of it each time, but it still isn't what I'd call fun.

Now, that's a law I could get behind. If you're caught texting or yapping on your WhateverPhone while driving, it's the same as drunk driving and therefore a ticket. And I'd love to see LEO's actually handing out tickets for this, because based on what I've seen, heck yeah, it is dangerous.
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah!
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos)
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast)
http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel)
----------------------------------------------------
To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism.

Last edited by Cowboy T; 09-30-2012 at 10:46 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:28 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.