Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2012, 1:58 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Exclamation AB 1527 Open carry of long guns & AB 1559 passed by the Governor

Brown signed these two pieces of legislation.

http://gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=17766


Open carry of long guns will be illegal!!

Last edited by taperxz; 09-28-2012 at 2:19 PM..
  #2  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:16 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

I no longer believe JB is a good governor or friend of firearms.
  #3  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:23 PM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 5,888
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

He's not a good governor, and he is not a good friend of the RKBA.

He's just better than we've recently had.
__________________
CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Not qualified to give any legal opinion so pay attention at your own risk.
  #4  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:24 PM
meaty-btz's Avatar
meaty-btz meaty-btz is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,871
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

1559 confuses me.

As for 1527, so... winning are we?
__________________
While the leaders of the Free Planets Alliance extol democracy, in reality, by ignoring laws and rules, they reduce it to a mere form. Itís a cunning but risky way of doing things. Because if the people in power donít respect their own laws, the standards of society itself slacken
  #5  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:24 PM
stix213's Avatar
stix213 stix213 is offline
AKA: Joe Censored
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Rafael
Posts: 16,282
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taperxz View Post
I no longer believe JB is a good governor or friend of firearms.
Friend may be too strong, but he was the most pro-gun out of the two options.
__________________
Support my Steam Greenlight campaign for Omega Reaction!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfile.../?id=618002901

Just vote Yes please, not asking for money.
  #6  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:24 PM
Mg911guy's Avatar
Mg911guy Mg911guy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 335
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Does this help us with any current court cases? We now have no option to open carry any firearms. Wasn't there a previous case that was dismissed because we had the option to open carry?
  #7  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:27 PM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 5,888
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stix213 View Post
Friend may be too strong, but he was the most pro-gun out of the two options.
I understand the arguments behind that and why a reasonable person could believe it.

But I think Meg Whitman would have been better for us in both the short- and the long-term.
__________________
CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Not qualified to give any legal opinion so pay attention at your own risk.
  #8  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:27 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

I sure hope a lawsuit is filed by the NRA or SAF on this matter!!
  #9  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:28 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stix213 View Post
Friend may be too strong, but he was the most pro-gun out of the two options.
Yes i understand that. I was truly hoping he would "shoot" this one down though! urrrrr
  #10  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:28 PM
cdtx2001's Avatar
cdtx2001 cdtx2001 is online now
Rebel Scum
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Over Here
Posts: 5,907
iTrader: 66 / 100%
Default

There is no way to legally carry a firearm in CA without the blessing/permission of the gooberment. Where do I sue?
__________________
WTB- A2 Flash Suppressors And Front Sight Towers
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=906994

"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kid" -Han Solo

"A dull knife is as useless as the man who would dare carry it"
  #11  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:33 PM
tenpercentfirearms's Avatar
tenpercentfirearms tenpercentfirearms is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Taft, CA
Posts: 12,837
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdtx2001 View Post
There is no way to legally carry a firearm in CA without the blessing/permission of the gooberment. Where do I sue?
Yeah I am thinking they just want a court case to go through as fast as possible.
__________________
For superior customer service and good prices visit www.tenpercentfirearms.com. We are Kern County's leader in black rifle sales.

The Calguns Foundation - Board Member. DONATE NOW! Your dollars go DIRECTLY to front-line legal activism in CA.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of The Calguns Foundation
  #12  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:35 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenpercentfirearms View Post
Yeah I am thinking they just want a court case to go through as fast as possible.
Really? or should your comment be taken with sarcasm. Just asking...
  #13  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:36 PM
Dantedamean's Avatar
Dantedamean Dantedamean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,257
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

What the hell does 1559 do? I read it but I don't really understand what's its saying.
  #14  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:38 PM
meaty-btz's Avatar
meaty-btz meaty-btz is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,871
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dantedamean View Post
What the hell does 1559 do? I read it but I don't really understand what's its saying.
I read it all the way through four times and it still does not make any sense. Does anyone know the impact of 1559.

I think we all get the impact of banning all open carry but seriously, is 1559 some kind of super secret back door ban/impactor. They are unlikely to put effort into a bill that does not restrict. So what then does it restrict.
__________________
While the leaders of the Free Planets Alliance extol democracy, in reality, by ignoring laws and rules, they reduce it to a mere form. Itís a cunning but risky way of doing things. Because if the people in power donít respect their own laws, the standards of society itself slacken
  #15  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:39 PM
CCWFacts CCWFacts is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,228
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mg911guy View Post
Does this help us with any current court cases? We now have no option to open carry any firearms. Wasn't there a previous case that was dismissed because we had the option to open carry?
I had the same thought when I saw this. This might be helpful to us in our court cases. If there's any right to bear (carry) arms in California, the only way to exercise that right is a LTC.
__________________
NRA life member

Exposing Leftists
Zomblog
The future of California?
  #16  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:44 PM
tenpercentfirearms's Avatar
tenpercentfirearms tenpercentfirearms is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Taft, CA
Posts: 12,837
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

1559 reduces the amount of money that business has to pay to buy guns you can't have and enables the movie industry to make money on guns you can't have. It actually is a pro-business deal, but a little hypocritical since we can't be trusted with guns, but the movie prop guys can.
__________________
For superior customer service and good prices visit www.tenpercentfirearms.com. We are Kern County's leader in black rifle sales.

The Calguns Foundation - Board Member. DONATE NOW! Your dollars go DIRECTLY to front-line legal activism in CA.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of The Calguns Foundation
  #17  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:44 PM
meaty-btz's Avatar
meaty-btz meaty-btz is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,871
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenpercentfirearms View Post
1559 reduces the amount of money that business has to pay to buy guns you can't have and enables the movie industry to make money on guns you can't have. It actually is a pro-business deal, but a little hypocritical since we can't be trusted with guns, but the movie prop guys can.
Is that really it? Hmmm...
__________________
While the leaders of the Free Planets Alliance extol democracy, in reality, by ignoring laws and rules, they reduce it to a mere form. Itís a cunning but risky way of doing things. Because if the people in power donít respect their own laws, the standards of society itself slacken
  #18  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:46 PM
J.D.Allen J.D.Allen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

When does the long gun open carry ban go into effect?
__________________
"Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool that follows him?"-Obi Wan Kenobi

the question here is not whether the carrying of arms is a good ideaóthe question is
whether carrying arms is constitutionally protected. Objective standards and due processónot
Defendantsí philosophy or personal beliefs about the value of this activityómust carry the day-Alan Gura
  #19  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:49 PM
chicoredneck's Avatar
chicoredneck chicoredneck is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,813
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

I smell a lawsuit. How are you supposed to carry your gun when you are using it?
  #20  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:49 PM
tenpercentfirearms's Avatar
tenpercentfirearms tenpercentfirearms is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Taft, CA
Posts: 12,837
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...01120120AB1527
__________________
For superior customer service and good prices visit www.tenpercentfirearms.com. We are Kern County's leader in black rifle sales.

The Calguns Foundation - Board Member. DONATE NOW! Your dollars go DIRECTLY to front-line legal activism in CA.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of The Calguns Foundation
  #21  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:49 PM
Uxi's Avatar
Uxi Uxi is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,110
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stix213 View Post
Friend may be too strong, but he was the most pro-gun out of the two options.
Maybe in the same way that herpes is better than HIV.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- Thomas Jefferson

9mm + 5.56mm =
.45ACP + 7.62 NATO =
10mm + 6.8 SPC =


Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis; Jn 1:14
  #22  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:51 PM
stix213's Avatar
stix213 stix213 is offline
AKA: Joe Censored
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Rafael
Posts: 16,282
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.D.Allen View Post
When does the long gun open carry ban go into effect?
I don't see a date in the bill, so I think that means Jan 1 2013. Someone correct me if wrong.
__________________
Support my Steam Greenlight campaign for Omega Reaction!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfile.../?id=618002901

Just vote Yes please, not asking for money.
  #23  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:58 PM
Mg911guy's Avatar
Mg911guy Mg911guy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 335
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Hey what does this mean it's from AB1527 didn't he veto SB 1366?
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16520 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1366, that would become operative only if SB 1366 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is enacted last.

I read it Here
  #24  
Old 09-28-2012, 2:59 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Hunters are exempted again.

(j) By a licensed hunter while engaged in hunting or while transporting that firearm when going to or returning from that hunting expedition.
  #25  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:03 PM
sandman21's Avatar
sandman21 sandman21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,144
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCWFacts View Post
I had the same thought when I saw this. This might be helpful to us in our court cases. If there's any right to bear (carry) arms in California, the only way to exercise that right is a LTC.
You can still LUCC, that will satisfy carry in CA. This is not going to speed up the process, we have had a ban on UOC for almost a year, no progress on the cases.

First thought I had was, great just lost UOC of rifles because everyone thought it would magically advance the court cases.
  #26  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:06 PM
Sarde Sarde is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 40
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicoredneck View Post
I smell a lawsuit. How are you supposed to carry your gun when you are using it?
While we all think this is simply the next step to get a substantive ability to carry (i.e. CCW). I never thought unloaded open carry of any form was what the 2nd amendment had in mind for being armed in case of conflict. An unloaded gun is as useful as a hunk of metal (or for you glock lovers a Tupperware of leftovers )

I cant say I am disappointed because I expected it. I don't like it, but I hope more good may come from it
  #27  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:07 PM
sakosf sakosf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SAN FRANCISCO
Posts: 791
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

"(c) When the firearm is either in a locked container or encased and it is being transported directly between places where a person is not prohibited from possessing that firearm and the course of travel shall include only those deviations between authorized locations as are reasonably necessary under the circumstances."

Does this only apply if the firearm is not being transported in a motor vehicle?
  #28  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:08 PM
meaty-btz's Avatar
meaty-btz meaty-btz is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,871
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mg911guy View Post
Hey what does this mean it's from AB1527 didn't he veto SB 1366?
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16520 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1366, that would become operative only if SB 1366 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is enacted last.

I read it Here

Wait so.. do.. crap. I admit it, was this a tactical move on Brown's part or am I giving him too much credit? Because it would be brilliant political move, it true, talk about pandering to two opposing sides at once.


EDIT

NO NO NO, that is referring to the alterations to 16520 (firearms definitions) as prescribed in 1366 only if both bills are passed. So only the definitions of a firearm in 16520 are unaltered, the ban stands.
__________________
While the leaders of the Free Planets Alliance extol democracy, in reality, by ignoring laws and rules, they reduce it to a mere form. Itís a cunning but risky way of doing things. Because if the people in power donít respect their own laws, the standards of society itself slacken

Last edited by meaty-btz; 09-28-2012 at 3:11 PM..
  #29  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:11 PM
Mg911guy's Avatar
Mg911guy Mg911guy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 335
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meaty-btz View Post

Wait so.. do.. crap. I admit it, was this a tactical move on Brown's part or am I giving him too much credit? Because it would be brilliant political move, it true, talk about pandering to two opposing sides at once.


EDIT

NO NO NO, that is referring to the alterations to 16520 (firearms definitions) as prescribed in 1366 only if both bills are passed. So only the definitions of a firearm in 16520 are unaltered, the ban stands.
Thanks I was confused.
  #30  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:12 PM
Uxi's Avatar
Uxi Uxi is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,110
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

On the whole doesn't affect me anyway since I'm still locked within overlapping victim disarmament zones. I never had a non-infringed right to bear arms in LA county anyway.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- Thomas Jefferson

9mm + 5.56mm =
.45ACP + 7.62 NATO =
10mm + 6.8 SPC =


Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis; Jn 1:14
  #31  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:13 PM
meaty-btz's Avatar
meaty-btz meaty-btz is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,871
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mg911guy View Post
Thanks I was confused.
Me too till I read 1366
__________________
While the leaders of the Free Planets Alliance extol democracy, in reality, by ignoring laws and rules, they reduce it to a mere form. Itís a cunning but risky way of doing things. Because if the people in power donít respect their own laws, the standards of society itself slacken
  #32  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:33 PM
Tripper's Avatar
Tripper Tripper is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Coast-Salinas
Posts: 6,709
iTrader: 91 / 100%
Default

where do I volunteer to be a test case
__________________
KZ1000 Police Motorcycle
Movado His/Her Watches
Front Sight 4-Day Handgun $99
PM about Front Sight Lifetime Memberships or Training Certificates
  #33  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:43 PM
shy 7th shy 7th is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 529
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripper View Post
where do I volunteer to be a test case
LOL, that's easy. It's specifically mentioned in the text:

Quote:
Originally Posted by the bill
26400.
(a) A person is guilty of carrying an unloaded firearm that is not a handgun in an incorporated city or city and county when that person carries upon his or her person an unloaded firearm that is not a handgun outside a vehicle while in the incorporated city or city and county.
So for most of us, we can volunteer just by walking right out our front doors.
  #34  
Old 09-28-2012, 3:50 PM
littlejake littlejake is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: So. Kommiefornia
Posts: 2,130
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Let's recall J.B. We got rid of Gray Davis (we didn't get any better with Arnold); but, let's kick them out as fast as they can elect them.
__________________
Life Member NRA and 2A Foundation. Member FPC.
My posts are my own opinions and do not reflect those of any organization I am a member of.
Nothing I post should be construed as legal advice; if you need legal advice, see a lawyer.

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
William Pitt (1759-1806)
  #35  
Old 09-28-2012, 4:02 PM
vantec08 vantec08 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaumont
Posts: 3,801
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taperxz View Post
Hunters are exempted again.

(j) By a licensed hunter while engaged in hunting or while transporting that firearm when going to or returning from that hunting expedition.
Right. The politicos STILL think the 2nd is about hunting.
  #36  
Old 09-28-2012, 4:07 PM
morfeeis's Avatar
morfeeis morfeeis is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Freeman in Mesa AZ
Posts: 7,498
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mg911guy View Post
Does this help us with any current court cases? We now have no option to open carry any firearms. Wasn't there a previous case that was dismissed because we had the option to open carry?
I don't think there is any help for us, now they'll just say carry a knife or pepper spray.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand View Post
You seek escape from pain. We seek the achievement of happiness. You exist for the sake of avoiding punishment. We exist for the sake of earning rewards. Threats will not make us function; fear is not our incentive. It is not death we wish to avoid, but life that we wish to live.
  #37  
Old 09-28-2012, 4:11 PM
YubaRiver YubaRiver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: polaris
Posts: 833
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by morfeeis View Post
I don't think there is any help for us, now they'll just say carry a knife or pepper spray.
Those are already illegal as weapons.
  #38  
Old 09-28-2012, 4:11 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vantec08 View Post
Right. The politicos STILL think the 2nd is about hunting.
My take on this is you gotta pay to play in this state. Hunters get more leeway on carry. Hopefully this will mean LTC's for all that want to pay to play at this point anyway.
  #39  
Old 09-28-2012, 4:14 PM
Cnynrat's Avatar
Cnynrat Cnynrat is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,022
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sakosf View Post
"(c) When the firearm is either in a locked container or encased and it is being transported directly between places where a person is not prohibited from possessing that firearm and the course of travel shall include only those deviations between authorized locations as are reasonably necessary under the circumstances."
IANAL, but it would seem to me that this provision could be challenged on the grounds that it is unconstitutionally vague. Who decides what is reasonably necessary?
__________________
Dave

Lifetime Member, Second Amendment Foundation
  #40  
Old 09-28-2012, 4:34 PM
Flopper's Avatar
Flopper Flopper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,285
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by morfeeis View Post
I don't think there is any help for us, now they'll just say carry a knife or pepper spray.
Quote:
Originally Posted by YubaRiver View Post
Those are already illegal as weapons.
To YubaRiver: WTF are you smokin'???
__________________
Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound. -- L. Neil Smith

Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:33 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.