Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated Centerfire rifles, carbines and other gas operated rifles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:37 AM
lawaia's Avatar
lawaia lawaia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 1,953
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default Magpul AFG on Featureless Build?

I am looking for opinions about the legality of running an AFG on a featureless build.

I think I want to give one a try, but my doubts are as follows:

1. It is advertised as a "forward grip" (ie. not a "hand rest" or "hand stop")
2. The "thumbhole" in the design

What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:40 AM
technique's Avatar
technique technique is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Idaho...free!
Posts: 10,491
iTrader: 76 / 100%
Default

Well, I cant get my thumb in there nor any finger but maybe my pinky.

I can also get a firm grip around the whole triangular part and hold it like a VFG...So I decided not to use it on a pistol build.

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:43 AM
lawaia's Avatar
lawaia lawaia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 1,953
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default

I hadn't even considered being able to grip the whole triangular area.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:47 AM
gn3hz3ku1* gn3hz3ku1* is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,072
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

dude this is CA.. they do call it a FG so who knows how CA can try to screw you
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:48 AM
djleisure's Avatar
djleisure djleisure is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LA - Dogtown
Posts: 4,782
iTrader: 140 / 100%
Default

I believe Magpul is currently looking on clarity from the proper agency (BATF? DOJ?) as to what the AFG is (or isn't?) classified as... until then, I would not mess with it. I like mine on my feature-full rifle though!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:52 AM
bombadillo's Avatar
bombadillo bombadillo is offline
Former Humboldtian
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IDAHO and another proud member of the quitters club!
Posts: 13,873
iTrader: 76 / 100%
Default

Well, technique, I went ahead and bought the Magpul AFG on your words so i'll give it a review upon arrival. I couldn't pass up AIMsurplus.com's sale of 32 bucks and a penny shipping. If I don't like it there will be one up in the classifieds soon but i'm putting it on a featureless build so we'll see if it gets me in trouble or not!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2009, 8:57 AM
technique's Avatar
technique technique is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Idaho...free!
Posts: 10,491
iTrader: 76 / 100%
Default

It really is a great grip...I like it a lot. Seeing a MP is looking for clarification, you may wanna wait until then. Have them spend the money or time and effort having it looked at. Save yours!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2009, 9:01 AM
shark92651's Avatar
shark92651 shark92651 is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,361
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

A "pistol grip" is pretty well defined in the CA law, and the law forbids a "forward pistol grip", but there is no extra definition for a "forward" pistol grip. Pistol grips do not have "thumbholes" in them so not sure how that is a factor. Yes, it is advertised as a "grip" but so is the TangoDown Rail Grip, which is just a rail panel that offers a textured and comfortable area to rest your hand on (sound familiar?). Also you can get a "pistol style grasp" around pretty much anything you place on a rail panel - a flashlight mount, a scope ring, a bipod leg. It's clearly not a "pistol grip" in my opinion, however.

I guess the debate will continue, but I think the fact that it is designed to rest only your fingers on it, with your thumb up on the handguard also helps in clarifying it as a NON-pistol grip - same as a MonsterMan grip in my opinion.
__________________

www.riflegear.com

Last edited by shark92651; 12-30-2009 at 9:04 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2009, 11:20 AM
dieselpower's Avatar
dieselpower dieselpower is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ventura
Posts: 10,386
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

I am a yo-yo on this issue...

The web of your hand is ABOVE the exposed portion of the trigger....so the definition of a pistol style grasp doesn't fit....and your trigger hand is nowhere near the grip.....but it does "allow" for a pistol-like grip....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-30-2009, 11:47 PM
killshot44's Avatar
killshot44 killshot44 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 3,923
iTrader: 28 / 97%
Default

Whoops!

Last edited by killshot44; 12-31-2009 at 1:04 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-30-2009, 11:56 PM
MikeR's Avatar
MikeR MikeR is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SoKal
Posts: 2,530
iTrader: 67 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killshot44 View Post
Call me crazy but...............

Doesn't the photo Techinique used above show it mounted backwards?

Here is DSG Arms' photo:


Methinks the "long" end goes toward the mag.


As far as it being considered, shall we say, a Feature ? My thought is yes. Any protrusion below the forward handguard would probably get looked at sideways.
You are crazy. Tech has it mounted right.

I also agree the web of your hand is above the action. I had hope the "right people" might comment because i don't want to be the test case.
__________________
http://i451.photobucket.com/albums/qq234/MRibz/Firearms/CPARA-1.jpg

"When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."~Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-30-2009, 11:57 PM
ChrisO's Avatar
ChrisO ChrisO is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

Tech has it mounted right. The hand stop part faces the business end wich I'm assuming you're calling the "Long" end. He just mounted it a little forward of the carbine rail to basically hold as much gun as he can. Often while using the thumb break technique and using a carbine rail "grabbing as much gun as you can" you will slip you're hand on the gas block/FSB and burn the crap out of you're self. He has it set up to prevent this, The grip is geared more towards people that use this type of grip. I fondled one and it truly is a improvement on the ergo's of gripping the foreguard and I didn't have much trouble with slipping even while pounding out a couple hundred rounds in Full auto on a patrol carbine "M16"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-31-2009, 1:04 AM
killshot44's Avatar
killshot44 killshot44 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 3,923
iTrader: 28 / 97%
Default

Yikes!!!! I take it back, I had it reversed...in my head. damn.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-31-2009, 8:57 AM
Gio's Avatar
Gio Gio is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Castro Valley, CA
Posts: 10,248
iTrader: 332 / 100%
Default

Well I guess I will be waiting for the word to come from Magpul about these being okay for use on Featureless Rifles. I would love to use one

-Gio
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-31-2009, 9:03 AM
MasterYong's Avatar
MasterYong MasterYong is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Humboldt County California
Posts: 2,737
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

There was a pretty extensive thread on this already. Featureless is G2G. This would be like putting a MMG on the front rail- it's just smaller than the MMG.

/still waiting for that calgunner to mod an MMG to be used as a FG. Can't remember his username, but the photoshopped mock-up looked... interesting...
__________________
01001100 01100101 01100001 01110010 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110011 01110111 01101001 01101101 00100000 01001001 00100111 01101100 01101100 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100100 01101111 01110111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01100001 01110010 01101001 01111010 01101111 01101110 01100001 00100000 01100010 01100001 01111001 00101110

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-31-2009, 9:04 AM
glock_this's Avatar
glock_this glock_this is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Under your skin
Posts: 8,192
iTrader: 49 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark92651 View Post
A "pistol grip" is pretty well defined in the CA law, and the law forbids a "forward pistol grip", but there is no extra definition for a "forward" pistol grip. Pistol grips do not have "thumbholes" in them so not sure how that is a factor. Yes, it is advertised as a "grip" but so is the TangoDown Rail Grip, which is just a rail panel that offers a textured and comfortable area to rest your hand on (sound familiar?). Also you can get a "pistol style grasp" around pretty much anything you place on a rail panel - a flashlight mount, a scope ring, a bipod leg. It's clearly not a "pistol grip" in my opinion, however.

I guess the debate will continue, but I think the fact that it is designed to rest only your fingers on it, with your thumb up on the handguard also helps in clarifying it as a NON-pistol grip - same as a MonsterMan grip in my opinion.
this is the exact logic I subscribe to and it seems totally clear to me

BUT, before I put it on my AR pistol, I would love to see something more concrete from those with bigger brains or from Magpul
__________________
10 +1 in the chamber

WTS: Gun stuff & things | WTB Chiappa Rhino 9mm 4"
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-31-2009, 9:04 AM
lawaia's Avatar
lawaia lawaia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 1,953
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default

I doubt that the guys at Magpul even understand what a featureless rifle is.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-31-2009, 9:13 AM
technique's Avatar
technique technique is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Idaho...free!
Posts: 10,491
iTrader: 76 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawaia View Post
I doubt that the guys at Magpul even understand what a featureless rifle is.
No but they know what an AOW is....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-31-2009, 9:20 AM
bobfried's Avatar
bobfried bobfried is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The OC
Posts: 1,643
iTrader: 114 / 100%
Default

Featureless in CA is good to go in my book. A pistol grip has to allow for a PG style grab with the web of the hand BELOW the action. The AFG does not allow this, even if your hands were HUGE, grasping it ala VFG style would still have the web of your hand above the action.

Of course this is all relating to CA law, which Magpul will most likely not give anyone a firm answer as DOJ would never give them a firm answer.

The only firm answer we might get is from ATF in regards to this being used on a Pistol, in which case it can than be argued that if ATF does not considered a VFg than it is also not a VFG in CA. So right now I'd say it's g2g on CA featureless but not on Pistols.
__________________
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/9391/armysignatureil3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-31-2009, 11:02 AM
MasterYong's Avatar
MasterYong MasterYong is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Humboldt County California
Posts: 2,737
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobfried View Post
Featureless in CA is good to go in my book. A pistol grip has to allow for a PG style grab with the web of the hand BELOW the action. The AFG does not allow this, even if your hands were HUGE, grasping it ala VFG style would still have the web of your hand above the action.

Of course this is all relating to CA law, which Magpul will most likely not give anyone a firm answer as DOJ would never give them a firm answer.

The only firm answer we might get is from ATF in regards to this being used on a Pistol, in which case it can than be argued that if ATF does not considered a VFg than it is also not a VFG in CA. So right now I'd say it's g2g on CA featureless but not on Pistols.
Except that ATF definitions are often different than CADOJ definitions.

I still agree that it's G2G (featureless), but I wouldn't trust that the CADOJ would follow suit with whatever the ATF decides.
__________________
01001100 01100101 01100001 01110010 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110011 01110111 01101001 01101101 00100000 01001001 00100111 01101100 01101100 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100100 01101111 01110111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01100001 01110010 01101001 01111010 01101111 01101110 01100001 00100000 01100010 01100001 01111001 00101110

Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-31-2009, 7:56 PM
Fate's Avatar
Fate Fate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Proud Member of the Quitter Club. Moscow, ID
Posts: 9,000
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark92651 View Post
A "pistol grip" is pretty well defined in the CA law, and the law forbids a "forward pistol grip", but there is no extra definition for a "forward" pistol grip.
Actually forward pistol grip is defined.

Quote:
Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, 5469
The following definitions apply to terms used in the identification of assault weapons pursuant to Penal Code section 12276.1:

(c) "forward pistol grip" means a grip that allows for a pistol style grasp forward of the trigger.


(d) "pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon" means a grip that allows for a pistol style grasp in which the web of the trigger hand (between the thumb and index finger) can be placed below the top of the exposed portion of the trigger while firing.
And this is where bobfried makes a faulty leap of logic when he said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobfried View Post
Featureless in CA is good to go in my book. A pistol grip has to allow for a PG style grab with the web of the hand BELOW the action. The AFG does not allow this, even if your hands were HUGE, grasping it ala VFG style would still have the web of your hand above the action.
(c) above defines forward pistol grip as allowing a pistol style grasp forward of the trigger. It says NOTHING that includes the definition of a "pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon" from part (d).

So there's a disconnect. While it's logical that (c) would include (d), it doesn't. So a forward pistol grip is not bound by the web of the hand below the action definition.

(c) just states if you can get a pistol style grasp on a GRIP mounted in front of the trigger, then it's a forward pistol grip. It specifies "grip", so things like sling mounts, bipods, light mounts are not included.

The AFG is marketed and used as a grip.

I would not use one on a featureless build or a pistol.

Like it or not, this is a pistol style grasp using this grip:

__________________
"On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

"Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
, in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

Last edited by Fate; 12-31-2009 at 8:01 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-31-2009, 8:02 PM
dchang0's Avatar
dchang0 dchang0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,484
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fate View Post
Actually forward pistol grip is defined.



And this is where bobfried makes a faulty leap of logic when he said:

(c) above defines forward pistol grip as allowing a pistol style grasp forward of the trigger. It says NOTHING that includes the definition of a "pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon" from part (d).

So there's a disconnect. While it's logical that (c) would include (d), it doesn't. So a forward pistol grip is not bound by the web of the hand below the action definition.

(c) just states if you can get a pistol style grasp on a GRIP mounted in front of the trigger, then it's a forward pistol grip. It specifies "grip", so things like sling mounts, bipods, light mounts are not included.

The AFG is marketed and used as a grip.

I would not use one on a featureless build or a pistol.

Like it or not, this is a pistol style grasp using this grip:
Nailed it, Fate. Thanks for actually posting up the relevant PC.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-31-2009, 8:20 PM
Fate's Avatar
Fate Fate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Proud Member of the Quitter Club. Moscow, ID
Posts: 9,000
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

Honestly hate being the wet blanket as the AFG looks good and I'm a big proponent of featureless rifles.

Further clarifying the relationship of (c) and (d), since (c) comes before (d) and makes no mention of (d)'s definitions, it's not bound by (d). (sounds like Abbot/Costello "Who's on First?" right? LOL).

And since "grip" is an important element of (c), it greenlights the KAC handstop on a featureless build. Not only is it not used or marketed as any form of grip (nor can you even remotely hold the rifle with it in any form of a pistol style grasp), it's a sling mount too. There's your GTG item on a featureless build, that's very defensible in court.

The AFG...not so much.
__________________
"On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

"Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
, in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-01-2010, 12:32 AM
bombadillo's Avatar
bombadillo bombadillo is offline
Former Humboldtian
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IDAHO and another proud member of the quitters club!
Posts: 13,873
iTrader: 76 / 100%
Default

Blast you!!! Maybe I won't use it on this one, i'll use it on my carbine and use a handstop by KAC on my featureless.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-01-2010, 6:35 AM
glock_this's Avatar
glock_this glock_this is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Under your skin
Posts: 8,192
iTrader: 49 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fate View Post
Honestly hate being the wet blanket as the AFG looks good and I'm a big proponent of featureless rifles.

Further clarifying the relationship of (c) and (d), since (c) comes before (d) and makes no mention of (d)'s definitions, it's not bound by (d). (sounds like Abbot/Costello "Who's on First?" right? LOL).

And since "grip" is an important element of (c), it greenlights the KAC handstop on a featureless build. Not only is it not used or marketed as any form of grip (nor can you even remotely hold the rifle with it in any form of a pistol style grasp), it's a sling mount too. There's your GTG item on a featureless build, that's very defensible in court.

The AFG...not so much.
and this is why I said I would wait for bigger brains with more specific law and definition knowledge to tackle the black and white wording of the law.

I can so easily see both sides of this argument.
__________________
10 +1 in the chamber

WTS: Gun stuff & things | WTB Chiappa Rhino 9mm 4"
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-01-2010, 8:10 AM
shark92651's Avatar
shark92651 shark92651 is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,361
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fate View Post
Actually forward pistol grip is defined.

And this is where bobfried makes a faulty leap of logic when he said:

(c) above defines forward pistol grip as allowing a pistol style grasp forward of the trigger. It says NOTHING that includes the definition of a "pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon" from part (d).

So there's a disconnect. While it's logical that (c) would include (d), it doesn't. So a forward pistol grip is not bound by the web of the hand below the action definition.

(c) just states if you can get a pistol style grasp on a GRIP mounted in front of the trigger, then it's a forward pistol grip. It specifies "grip", so things like sling mounts, bipods, light mounts are not included.

The AFG is marketed and used as a grip.

I would not use one on a featureless build or a pistol.

Like it or not, this is a pistol style grasp using this grip:
Thanks for pointing out the separate definition of "forward pistol grip". But for the sake of argument, since the definition of "pistol grip" cannot be applied and all that is written in the law is the following:

"forward pistol grip" means a grip that allows for a pistol style grasp forward of the trigger.

Does this also mean that a finger stop or bipod leg could also be considered a FPG? I'm not sure if the terms used in marketing a product are relevant. If Magpul called it a "comfort rest" or something like that, would that help our arguments? This stuff is maddening, the placement and shape of a simple piece of plastic on our guns is the difference between being law-abiding and being a criminal
__________________

www.riflegear.com
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-01-2010, 10:15 AM
Fate's Avatar
Fate Fate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Proud Member of the Quitter Club. Moscow, ID
Posts: 9,000
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark92651 View Post
Does this also mean that a finger stop or bipod leg could also be considered a FPG? I'm not sure if the terms used in marketing a product are relevant. If Magpul called it a "comfort rest" or something like that, would that help our arguments? This stuff is maddening, the placement and shape of a simple piece of plastic on our guns is the difference between being law-abiding and being a criminal
No, a non-grip cannot be considered a FPG. This is why grip was specifically added to the language of the bill. Early versions essentially stated "any protruding object that could be held forward of the trigger" would be an illegal feature. In the comments period this was pointed out as incredibly broad and such things as bipods, sling mounts, light mounts, etc were mentioned as then falling into the overbroad definition. Thus the bill was rewritten to state "grip" as the specific thing that's banned.

See pages 17-22 in the following document to see comments/responses and see how we got where we are:
http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/ag...regs/fsor.pdf? (link updated 5/14/13)

Full background:
http://www.ag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/sb23indx.php
__________________
"On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

"Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
, in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

Last edited by Fate; 05-14-2013 at 8:49 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-15-2010, 10:56 PM
darkjedi351's Avatar
darkjedi351 darkjedi351 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Barbara/Ventura, ca
Posts: 946
iTrader: 95 / 100%
Default

you know tech's pic is very misleading. the AFG isn't designed to be held that way at all.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...gled-foregrip/

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-15-2010, 11:13 PM
darkjedi351's Avatar
darkjedi351 darkjedi351 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Barbara/Ventura, ca
Posts: 946
iTrader: 95 / 100%
Default

yea, i know. we need to vote those a**clowns out of office!
so it's a no go on a featurless but how about with a fixed 10 round mag?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-15-2010, 11:16 PM
DedEye's Avatar
DedEye DedEye is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In Transit
Posts: 8,685
iTrader: 36 / 97%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkjedi351 View Post
yea, i know. we need to vote those a**clowns out of office!
so it's a no go on a featurless but how about with a fixed 10 round mag?
Anything (non-NFA) goes on a fixed, ten round magazine rifle.
__________________
These posts are Fiction. They do not contain legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer. Any resemblance to real persons are pure coincidence. These posts may pose an inhalation hazard, reading can be harmful or fatal. No statements made on this forum are meant to represent any corporate or business entity, others, or myself. Especially not myself.

Stop duping answers, help expand the FAQ.

Why yes, that is me in my avatar and yes, I AM wearing a life jacket.

WTS Keltec P11
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-16-2010, 1:53 AM
DanHuuN's Avatar
DanHuuN DanHuuN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 2,040
iTrader: 99 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DedEye View Post
Anything (non-NFA) goes on a fixed, ten round magazine rifle.
DITTO
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-16-2010, 1:34 PM
ChrisO's Avatar
ChrisO ChrisO is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkjedi351 View Post
you know tech's pic is very misleading. the AFG isn't designed to be held that way at all.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...gled-foregrip/


It doesn't matter if the pic is misleading or if it's not meant to be used that way, IT CAN BE! Nuff said, You would have a very hard time defending that in court.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-16-2010, 6:19 PM
Jpach's Avatar
Jpach Jpach is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clarita
Posts: 4,721
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default

Fill the open space in the AFC. That seems to be a fix
__________________
PM or Email me if you have questions: Jpach89@gmail.com

Check out my LMT .308 AR
Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton View Post
I have to try that method of attaching the front of a sling to the gun via pubic hair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomb_on_bus View Post
Best part of buying that stock is it comes with its own complimentary jar of anal lube! There were several flavors to choose from, regular, hot cinnamon, or bacon. Im a man of danger so I chose Hot cinnamon to use with my bump fire buttstock.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-16-2010, 7:13 PM
technique's Avatar
technique technique is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Idaho...free!
Posts: 10,491
iTrader: 76 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DedEye View Post
And yet that doesn't matter as far as California law is concerned.
Yup. Pretty much.
Its not so much that "its not the way its intended to be held"...its that you can.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-16-2010, 7:47 PM
ChrisO's Avatar
ChrisO ChrisO is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpach View Post
Fill the open space in the AFC. That seems to be a fix
I don't really think the open space is the problem, Did you not see the pic tech posted? He is not holding through the hole and holding it with a pistol grip type grasp.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-17-2010, 1:50 AM
Jpach's Avatar
Jpach Jpach is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clarita
Posts: 4,721
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisO View Post
I don't really think the open space is the problem, Did you not see the pic tech posted? He is not holding through the hole and holding it with a pistol grip type grasp.
Damnit. Didnt some people say its cool to use a Kydexgrip/MMG type thing as a foregrip since it doesnt allow for a pg-style grasp? Shouldnt this be the same then?

I see what your saying and I agree with you actually, Im just bringing up something that might aid in the discussion here.

Doesnt a finger stop technically allow a PG style grasp too?
__________________
PM or Email me if you have questions: Jpach89@gmail.com

Check out my LMT .308 AR
Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton View Post
I have to try that method of attaching the front of a sling to the gun via pubic hair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomb_on_bus View Post
Best part of buying that stock is it comes with its own complimentary jar of anal lube! There were several flavors to choose from, regular, hot cinnamon, or bacon. Im a man of danger so I chose Hot cinnamon to use with my bump fire buttstock.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-17-2010, 8:53 AM
Fate's Avatar
Fate Fate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Proud Member of the Quitter Club. Moscow, ID
Posts: 9,000
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpach View Post
Damnit. Didnt some people say its cool to use a Kydex grip/MMG type thing as a foregrip since it doesnt allow for a pg-style grasp? Shouldnt this be the same then?
Kydex/MMG don't allow a pistol style grasp. Thus, GTG. Now if you actually added a Kydex "fin" that extended behind the AFG, like a MMG, it'd be ok on a featureless. Ugly, but legal.

Quote:
Doesnt a finger stop technically allow a PG style grasp too?
See posts 21 and 27. The finger stop is not a grip and thus it's irrelevant whether or not you *might* be able to get the web of the hand behind it. Furthermore, I challenge anyone to actually HOLD and CONTROL a rifle with one hand using only the KAC handstop. It's impossible.
__________________
"On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

"Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
, in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

Last edited by Fate; 01-17-2010 at 9:01 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-18-2010, 12:43 AM
Jpach's Avatar
Jpach Jpach is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clarita
Posts: 4,721
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fate View Post
Kydex/MMG don't allow a pistol style grasp. Thus, GTG. Now if you actually added a Kydex "fin" that extended behind the AFG, like a MMG, it'd be ok on a featureless. Ugly, but legal.


See posts 21 and 27. The finger stop is not a grip and thus it's irrelevant whether or not you *might* be able to get the web of the hand behind it. Furthermore, I challenge anyone to actually HOLD and CONTROL a rifle with one hand using only the KAC handstop. It's impossible.
Sorry, I wasnt specific enough. I meant the kydex grip/mmg used as foregrips. Ive seen it done before and it seemed that people gave it the OK on a featureless build IIRC. Perhaps I recalled incorrectly?
__________________
PM or Email me if you have questions: Jpach89@gmail.com

Check out my LMT .308 AR
Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton View Post
I have to try that method of attaching the front of a sling to the gun via pubic hair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomb_on_bus View Post
Best part of buying that stock is it comes with its own complimentary jar of anal lube! There were several flavors to choose from, regular, hot cinnamon, or bacon. Im a man of danger so I chose Hot cinnamon to use with my bump fire buttstock.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-18-2010, 8:30 AM
Jwood562 Jwood562 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,174
iTrader: 64 / 100%
Default

You will never get a concrete answer. even with the people in the DOJ or ATF or wherever. ALl of the products produced today bring up boundries and push the limits of legal definitions/intensions/literature. You can propose this question to different people at different agencies and get a handful of different answers. You can throw it at different DAs and get different answers.

People even push the envelope when they mount BUIS on the underside of their rail for a hand stop, technically it can be gripped in the same manner that technique has shown above. NOw I know that is not what a BUIS was made for but it is the manner that it is being used and the fact is that it is being used as a FG.

it is just a matter of time before somebody is the sacrifcial lamb and gets slaughtered in court by some over zealous DA or ATF agent.

When in doubt... leave it out

I am in the same boat and would give anything to throw the AFG on my pistol but I fell that its not worth the risk
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-18-2010, 8:39 AM
Fate's Avatar
Fate Fate is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Proud Member of the Quitter Club. Moscow, ID
Posts: 9,000
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpach View Post
Sorry, I wasnt specific enough. I meant the kydex grip/mmg used as foregrips. Ive seen it done before and it seemed that people gave it the OK on a featureless build IIRC. Perhaps I recalled incorrectly?
Kydex as forward grip is good to go.

MMG *might* be a bad idea as you could potentially get a pistol style grasp on it, like the AFG. Used up front, it doesn't require you to actually be able to reach a trigger like it does in the normal pistol grip spot, so that's something to consider. I don't have a MMG to actually check it out.
__________________
"On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

"Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
, in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

Last edited by Fate; 01-18-2010 at 8:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:07 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.