|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| The California Firearms Enthusiast's Home On The Internet |
| CA AW ID Flowchart | CA Rifle AW ID Interactive Chart | CA Handgun AW ID Flowchart | CA Shotgun AW ID Flowchart | OLL Assembly Guide |
|
|||||||
| 2nd Amend. Politics and Laws Discuss gun rights and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
| View Poll Results: If you LOC was legal, would you? | |||
| Never |
   
|
49 | 18.92% |
| Everyday |
  
|
210 | 81.08% |
| Voters: 259. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#23
11-19-2009, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
It would depend on the situation. In the woods, yes, I'd LOC. If I had the option to CC, then that's what I'd do in the city. If I didn't have the option to CC, I'd LOC.
__________________
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson Quote:
|
|
#24
11-20-2009, 12:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are times I would like to LOC times I would Like to CCW there are also times I would feel more comfortable UOC (keep in mine I'm thinking unchambered) and Times I would feel it best to not carry. It all depends on where I'm going, and what I'm doing or planing to do.
__________________
Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit! Smyrna Lodge #532 F.&A.M.
|
|
#25
11-20-2009, 12:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here I am, Captain Obvious!!! (you can see that I believe greatly in the power of visual deterrences) read on for a more involved explanation: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/open-...-argument.html
__________________
 "Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen." -- Sir Robert Peel Disclaimer: my posts are not intended as legal advice and do not represent the positions of any public or private organization. My posts are mine alone.
|
|
#26
11-20-2009, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Liberty1 that was an outstanding piece of literature. Thank you for sharing that. I have taken your points and now have a better perspective on the subject. I have heard the "you will be a target" argument many times and I see your point on that issue. Thanks again
__________________
Semper Fi
|
|
#27
11-20-2009, 01:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would.
Well, there are those occasions...like your inlaw's house. That is best dealt with CCW.
__________________
Note: I do not work for NRA and am not on their payroll in any shape or form. My opinion represents no one other than myself. (in retrospect should have picked a better handle to avoid confusion) Quote:
|
|
#30
11-20-2009, 08:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 "A 223? Who needs a gun that can fire 223 rounds a minute?" "Why does Sarah Palin (or anyone else) need a machine gun to hunt moose?"
__________________
John -- bitter gun owner. Team Billy Jack Spokesman and Webmaster at www.californiaconcealedcarry.com HOWEVER, all opinions expressed here are my own unless I say otherwise.  Note: TBJ and CaliforniaConcealedCarry.com uphold the law in every respect. We insist that Sheriffs and Police Chiefs also so do.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
 |
 |
Linear Mode
