![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| The California Firearms Enthusiast's Home On The Internet |
| CA AW ID Flowchart | CA Rifle AW ID Interactive Chart | CA Handgun AW ID Flowchart | CA Shotgun AW ID Flowchart | OLL Assembly Guide |
|
|||||||
| CGN's Best Threads (Limited Posting) This forum is for storing and or easy accessing useful or important threads. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
|
you can have the loaded mags right next to the gun, even touching in a locked container or open carried(UOC is another subject). Just as long as the gun is unloaded you will not violate PC12031 nor violate people vs clark
__________________
"Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense." Ron Paul "The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." - Thomas Jefferson Quote:
|
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sounds like , We are Guilty Untill Proovin Innocent"
I mite get some mud flaps for the rock crawler 4Runner B4 going to the Rubicon, And make sure all the turn signals and all work too..... How sad in the USA..... Maybe 2012 will be the ????????? times...... That is crap that alot of cops dont get schooled on whats legal and not!
__________________
"Unless you have something possitive to say, Shut your PieHole" please.
|
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, in my experience in that stop and search, it seemed that as long as the guns you have are not LOADED, it is just fine to have LOADED MAGAZINES and/or AMMUNITION in the same container as the UNLOADED gun (My Sigma was empty, but there were 4 loaded mags next to it in the same original box).
__________________
"This is a Glock Forty. 50 Cent, Too Short, all of 'em talk about a Glock Forty. Ok? I'm the only in this room professional enough that I know of that carries a Glock Forty. I'm the only one-" In Glock We Trust. |
|
#107
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thats NOT great advice.. Yes, YOU ARE obligated to tell an officer you have weapons if he asks. Look up "officer safety doctrine" and all the associated case laws. If he asks you if you have any weapons, you give that kind of answer, he subsquently asks if he/she can search your vehicle and you reply no..He will find a reason to. At first hes limited to basically the interior of the vehicle "within arms reach"..If he is able to transition from suspicious to pc and then finds the weapons after youve said no..Now youre in kim chi..To what extent is arguable, but why go through the hassle?
Dont give them a reason to stop you for one.. Secondly, if youre asked a simple question,lying will not go over well..If youre weapons are legal and compliant then why lie/play word games? Stay legal and theres no issue even if you do have weapons. No one seems to want to evaluate the reasoning behind the LEO's doing what they do. Youre in SO Cal, its a rough town. There is a HUGE gang problem and weapons are an everyday thing. Officers die because the wrong people have firearms.Civilians die, because of firearms in the wrong hands. Try placing yourself in theyre shoes... Traffic stops are THE most dangerous of all contacts with the public. Instead of just assuming theyre out to get you and that evil OLL, just talk to them like the humans that they are..The bullet buttons a pretty much accepted thing now..Stay safe, stay legal and all will be well.
__________________
Embrace the suck. |
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The advice is to avoid directly answering the question (which would be giving up our 4th and 5th rights) by clearly stating that we are carrying nothing illegal, and to refuse consent to search. If he is asking for consent, he does not have RS or PC. If he has RS or PC, he will not ask for consent, and refusal of consent cannot be construed to RS or PC. The intimidation that many feel when faced by an officer makes them feel that refusal to consent would be used at RS. If a person chooses to give up their 5th amendment rights and answer the question directly, then yes... it would be stupid and big trouble to lie.
__________________
-- Rich Quote:
|
|
#109
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. |
|
#110
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |