Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated Centerfire rifles, carbines and other gas operated rifles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:39 AM
1snowridr's Avatar
1snowridr 1snowridr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 342
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default Featureless stock claims Doj approved

I don't believe it & I'm sure they don't have paperwork to back it up. Anyone else know?

IMG_20171110_072526.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:52 AM
Full Clip's Avatar
Full Clip Full Clip is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Playa Vista, CA
Posts: 9,696
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

DOJ does not approve of anything.
__________________
“Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.” — Robert A. Heinlein

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds” — Samuel Adams
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:53 AM
Kwikvette's Avatar
Kwikvette Kwikvette is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Monterey County
Posts: 3,513
iTrader: 47 / 100%
Default

^^^

They only state what is not legal
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by longrange1 View Post
my gun shoots better with shiny brass...plus not only does the shiny brass make me look like a pimp at the range if the sun catches it just right it blinds the guy next to me which improves my odds of winning the match.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2017, 7:11 AM
Calico1404's Avatar
Calico1404 Calico1404 is offline
Watching you, watch me.
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,556
iTrader: 119 / 100%
Default

^^^^ exactly
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2017, 7:19 AM
sealocan sealocan is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7,081
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

Maybe they paid someone to personally "approve" their product who had legally change their name to ...


Mr. "DOJ California".



( Hey, It's not like I make a lot of money approving theses things but I have the middle initial "F" so I can also approve things for your company that way if you prefer.)











I'm joking but I like thinking outside the box.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2017, 8:11 AM
kcheung2's Avatar
kcheung2 kcheung2 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,651
iTrader: 31 / 100%
Default

Donald Oscar Jones, who lives in CA, approves of it.
__________________
---------------------
"There is no "best." If there was, everyone here would own that one, and no other." - DSB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2017, 5:30 PM
AEtrane AEtrane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 429
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

It'll be interesting to hear what all the "thordsen stock is legal by virtue of being a stock" crowd says about this one.

The grip angle/location is exactly the same.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:09 PM
mshill's Avatar
mshill mshill is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,715
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AEtrane View Post
It'll be interesting to hear what all the "thordsen stock is legal by virtue of being a stock" crowd says about this one.

The grip angle/location is exactly the same.
No one is saying it's not legal... they are simply saying that the DOJ won't ever say that they are except for the one case where an agent testified that the U15 stock and the Monsterman grip were not pistol grips.
__________________
Quote:
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:31 PM
AEtrane AEtrane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 429
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

"No one is saying it's not legal... they are simply saying that the DOJ won't ever say that they are"

So they're saying water is wet.

Got it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:49 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 37,270
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AEtrane View Post
"No one is saying it's not legal... they are simply saying that the DOJ won't ever say that they are"

So they're saying water is wet.

Got it.
The elected leadership of the DOJ sets policy. One of those policies is evidently 'no help of any kind to gun owners'.
__________________
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice]

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.


Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-10-2017, 6:55 PM
Ford8N's Avatar
Ford8N Ford8N is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern Rhovanion
Posts: 5,941
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Librarian View Post
The elected leadership of the DOJ sets policy. One of those policies is evidently 'no help of any kind to gun owners'.
^^^^^^^^

This

They hate California gun owners and purposely are trying to bust them for violating California gun law. That's why they want photos.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2017, 9:47 PM
BigPimping's Avatar
BigPimping BigPimping is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roasting those freaks in the hood
Posts: 16,024
iTrader: 57 / 100%
Default

The DOJ is purposely trying to set us all up and railroad us into convictions. Instead of trying to go after real criminals, they like to go after innocent, tax-paying citizens instead.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2017, 10:31 PM
Bobby Ricigliano's Avatar
Bobby Ricigliano Bobby Ricigliano is offline
Mit Gott und Mauser
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The People's Glorious Republik of Southern Kalifornistan
Posts: 16,190
iTrader: 318 / 100%
Default

I sold off one of my earlier featureless rifles. I certified it as "Bob Ricigliano Approved" with provenance in the form of a handwritten note. It bumped up the value by two bits.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-10-2017, 10:45 PM
johnthomas's Avatar
johnthomas johnthomas is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Monterey County
Posts: 6,573
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

OP, have you contacted the vendor for a copy of the letter from DOJ approving this stock?
__________________
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-10-2017, 10:48 PM
CSACANNONEER's Avatar
CSACANNONEER CSACANNONEER is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 42,791
iTrader: 130 / 100%
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Ricigliano View Post
I sold off one of my earlier featureless rifles. I certified it as "Bob Ricigliano Approved" with provenance in the form of a handwritten note. It bumped up the value by two bits.
Two bits of what? Broken glass?
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor
California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller
Ventura County approved CCW Instructor
Utah CCW Instructor


Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners.

CCW SAFE MEMBERSHIPS HERE
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-11-2017, 5:23 AM
1snowridr's Avatar
1snowridr 1snowridr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 342
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnthomas View Post
OP, have you contacted the vendor for a copy of the letter from DOJ approving this stock?
No, I have no interest in owning this stock. I found their add amusing.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-11-2017, 6:45 PM
saki302's Avatar
saki302 saki302 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,629
iTrader: 94 / 100%
Default

Good lord that's ugly. It looks like they took a Thordsen and beat it with Rosie O'Donnell.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.