Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 07-25-2017, 11:03 AM
Uncivil Engineer Uncivil Engineer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 135
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopalong View Post
Unfortunately, this is the winning answer.
I agree. So the best line of attack it's to show the virtues are at odds with one another. We need to reframe the gun laws as anti civil rights that disproportionately effect women and minorities. Supported by facts and evidence. Young progressives are ready to blame all actions by the government as racist. We simply need to arm then with those facts. There is ample historical documentation that gun control was instituted in California to disarm Hispanics and Asians. Further allowing sheriffs or any government official to deny a CCW systemically impeded women and minorities. Making cosmetic or better described ergonomic features illegal is women or disabled people that would make better use of or even require such features.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 08-31-2017, 5:07 PM
dfletcher dfletcher is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 11,900
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IVC View Post
Not really.

Compare to the "roster lawsuit" where we can show that training materials explicitly say "don't use these 'safety' devices'," where we can get the same gun if it's private party transfer and where supposedly unsafe guns are grandfathered on the roster. Yet, we are getting turned down by the courts...
With respect to the roster, grandfathering and currently allowing PPT of non-roster handguns - we all know how the CA legislature would attempt to remedy that situation, yes? Not by going up but by going down, so to speak. Perhaps that would bite them in the fanny.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:25 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.