Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > THE CALGUNS COMMUNITY > CGSSA Northern California Chapters > Wine Country Chapter
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2014, 1:56 PM
JSKI1911 JSKI1911 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Napa Valley
Posts: 16
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Wine Country Sheriffs Good Cause, Post Peruta

Has anyone contacted their Wine Country Sheriffs Departments, to determine if they are still requiring a Good Cause statement in light of the Peruta decision?

I had contacted the Napa SO and they were not rescinding the Good Cause requirement.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2014, 4:03 PM
Sunday Sunday is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shasta Co.
Posts: 5,471
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Cival law suits!!Own their homes.
__________________
California the only state in the union where the idiot gun owners vote in anti gun politicians and wonder where their gun rights have gone.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2014, 10:28 AM
G2283's Avatar
G2283 G2283 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 46
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Anyone talk to the Sonoma County SO yet to see if they plan on changing the "just cause" to personal protection? I'm guessing that they will stall as long as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2014, 6:29 PM
Survivalism Survivalism is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G2283 View Post
Anyone talk to the Sonoma County SO yet to see if they plan on changing the "just cause" to personal protection? I'm guessing that they will stall as long as possible.
From what I'm seeing in the 707 Banter thread, lots of people are applying, but none have gotten word yet.
__________________
Bill of Rights or GTFO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2014, 10:07 AM
taperxz taperxz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake County
Posts: 14,891
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Mendo has been basically shall issue for years. Lake is basically shall issue with no strings attached since Rivero got into office 3 years ago. Whether he wins reelection or not i expect it to stay the same if either of the other two candidates wins.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2014, 11:14 PM
JSKI1911 JSKI1911 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Napa Valley
Posts: 16
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Napa City residents are dead in the water. The Napa SO wont accept any applications from Napa City residents. The Napa SO stance is that Napa residents must apply with the city. The Napa PD is not handing out applications until the dust has settled on Peruta. Stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2014, 9:30 AM
G2283's Avatar
G2283 G2283 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 46
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Dropped off my app yesterday and just got off the phone with Sonoma County SO. They are "shall issue" never thought I would see the day !!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-27-2014, 9:42 PM
DodgeThis's Avatar
DodgeThis DodgeThis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 142
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G2283 View Post
Dropped off my app yesterday and just got off the phone with Sonoma County SO. They are "shall issue" never thought I would see the day !!!
Someone from Santa Rosa just got denied on 02/10/14. Check the LTC forum. Good luck man, I will be applying soon.
__________________
One shot, one kill.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-06-2014, 8:22 PM
crya79's Avatar
crya79 crya79 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Napa Valley
Posts: 680
iTrader: 25 / 100%
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSKI1911 View Post
Has anyone contacted their Wine Country Sheriffs Departments, to determine if they are still requiring a Good Cause statement in light of the Peruta decision?

I had contacted the Napa SO and they were not rescinding the Good Cause requirement.
Guys! There's now a two-way race for Sheriff in Napa:
http://napavalleyregister.com/eagle/...a4bcf887a.html

I think now that more than one person is running somehow our local chapter should find a way with Calguns support to start putting pressure on these candidates to come out and say whether they will support current policies which have twice been ruled unconstitutional or whether they will comply and change course like SD and OC have done. What do you guys think? How do we get these candidates to address their positions on CCW?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2014, 5:11 PM
jglass jglass is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default ccw

on Tuesday the 5th Steve Fratis came on ksro 1350am radio and they did an interview with him about if they would start issuing ccw's in Sonoma county, he said as long as you have clean back round and no felonies basically past all that and they would issue you one, I dropped my app off on wed now waiting I will keep you posted.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-08-2014, 6:53 PM
jglass jglass is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

steve fratis is also the issuing sheriff for Sonoma county
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-08-2014, 7:02 PM
707electrician's Avatar
707electrician 707electrician is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 2,672
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jglass View Post
on Tuesday the 5th Steve Fratis came on ksro 1350am radio and they did an interview with him about if they would start issuing ccw's in Sonoma county, he said as long as you have clean back round and no felonies basically past all that and they would issue you one, I dropped my app off on wed now waiting I will keep you posted.
Tuesday the 5th is when they count granted a temporary stay to allow for petitions for en banc to be filed and since then they have gone back to requiring you to "supplement your good cause" or so I thought that was the case
__________________
Brian Kelly

PM me for electrical work

Last edited by 707electrician; 03-08-2014 at 7:04 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-10-2014, 1:36 PM
egslaw's Avatar
egslaw egslaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 167
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

See below from Sonoma County Sheriff's Website found here: http://www.sonomasheriff.org/ccw.php

LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON

PERUTA v. COUNTY of SAN DIEGO

On 2/13/2014 the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office dropped the "good cause" standard for issuing conceal carry permits after the requirement was struck down that day by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court ruled that the Second Amendment bars California counties from requiring law-abiding gun owners who want to carry concealed firearms to demonstrate special, individualized needs for protection.

On 2/28/2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided to withdraw their decision in the above case by a decision to rehear the case En Banc. The Court has ordered a stay on the issuance of their previous mandate from 2/13/2014, which only required an applicant to state a need of “self defense” as their reason for desiring a CCW License. Therefore, as of 2/28/14 the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office will revert back to requiring all applicants to supplement the “good cause” statement for the CCW License in accord with Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office Policy 219 and California Penal Code section 26150(a)(2).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-26-2014, 7:07 PM
tomfrey tomfrey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 359
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default Where to apply ?

I live in Santa Rosa and I applied (and was denied) last April at the Sheriffs Office. Now I see this on their website:

QUALIFIED APPLICANTS:

In order to qualify for a license to carry a firearm, the applicant must meet certain
requirements, including:

(a) Be a resident of unincorporated Sonoma County or the Cities of Windsor, Sonoma, Cloverdale, Cotati or Healdsburg.(Penal Code § 26150; Penal Code § 26155).

When I applied a year ago I asked the SO where to apply since I lived within city limits, and was told the SO- have things changed ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:29 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.