Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-05-2013, 9:57 PM
Gabriel80's Avatar
Gabriel80 Gabriel80 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 436
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citadelonline View Post
I'd like to hear from, in this thread or a separate thread, individuals who have DROS'd a firearm with no conflicts, delays or questionable denials during the recent time period in question.
A little balance might be useful in characterizing the proportionality, extent and relative number of processing issues being experienced.
Me too! Anyone pick up an AR or AK when they're supposed to? Anyone dros anything at the end of 2012 and get it in 10 or 11 days?

I've never been convicted of a crime. I own 5 firearms, the last one I drosed was delayed by 1 (or 2?) days, which was far early last year (pre panic and back up). I believe the delay was a mistake, or "just making sure" as DOJ said.

I've got my 6th firearm in jail right now (my first "black rifle") and for some reason I'm paranoid it will be caught up in delay. I really have nothing that would make me inelligible from clearing but we all know how busy DOJ is.

My pick up date is Jan 14th and I'm pretty excited/nervous, anyone care to share a recent, positive and smooth, normal experience?
__________________
none of us are as strong as all of us
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-06-2013, 12:01 PM
Dustyzz Dustyzz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 21
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Well my wife,sister-in-law, and brother-in-law all bought their first hand guns in December and had no dros issues... I on the other hand am now on day 21 of the dros process. I am assuming my delay is because of a misdemeanor assault conviction from 1982 ( I was 21 and got into a bar fight , I got 6 months unadjudicated probation but as I understand this will still show up as a conviction.) However I have no way to confirm why I am on DROS delay since the DROS department isn't accepting calls. I guess the issue that I have with the CA DOJ is that the DROS department isn't taking calls until January 14th (maybe or maybe not) so I am literally being denied my 2A rights without any method of appeal or recourse. I understand the need to keep firearms out of bad guys hands but this is bordering on abusing the rights of law abiding citizens.

Last edited by Dustyzz; 01-06-2013 at 12:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-08-2013, 9:59 AM
Hoooper Hoooper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 2,336
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citadelonline View Post
I'd like to hear from, in this thread or a separate thread, individuals who have DROS'd a firearm with no conflicts, delays or questionable denials during the recent time period in question.
A little balance might be useful in characterizing the proportionality, extent and relative number of processing issues being experienced.
I picked up on 1/2/13, no issues or delays at all
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:49 AM
scsurfer scsurfer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 51
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I bought a gun in November. No problem. Bought one on the 28th of dec. and it is in delay. If there was a problem wouldn't it have come out on the first purchase in nov. I called yesterday and left a message. I got a call today saying that the back ground check needed to be investigated. And they will not look at my case until the. 15th and it could be even longer. There has got to be some bump that test the 2 amendment. Could we see a huge law suit against the state?
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:56 AM
brandon1234 brandon1234 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 28
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scsurfer View Post
I bought a gun in November. No problem. Bought one on the 28th of dec. and it is in delay. If there was a problem wouldn't it have come out on the first purchase in nov. I called yesterday and left a message. I got a call today saying that the back ground check needed to be investigated. And they will not look at my case until the. 15th and it could be even longer. There has got to be some bump that test the 2 amendment. Could we see a huge law suit against the state?
No criminal history? Sometimes it seems that some state employees might investigate things others were not concerned with. If that makes any sense?
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-08-2013, 11:12 AM
JoeyJ JoeyJ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 75
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Purchased in July 12 no problem, purchased a Ruger SR22 on Dec 31st and just got a call from the dealer that I was delayed. called BOF number and it's just a outgoing message to call their general info number. Left a message there but sure if I get any reply it will be that I'm delayed pending further investigation. I can understand that they want to make sure I haven't been arrested or been convicted in the last 6 months so I'll practice some patience and "assume" it's just for backlog reasons and not any other. I can understand that under the current circumstances, the last thing they want is to make a mistake on one person and have it come back to haunt all of us. Any idea if this is just a CA issue?

UPDATE: 1/8/13 2:25pm Unfortunately I missed the call but did get a call back from BOF. Basically the generic message, "it's our busiest time of the year, increased demand, doesn't mean you've been denied, may be something that needs documents from the courts to resolve and a call back number". Very friendly woman. Started out by saying she could only provide general info. Also said if I haven't heard anything by the 14th to call back. My get out of jail date was the 10th so not a huge wait.

Last edited by JoeyJ; 01-08-2013 at 1:57 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-08-2013, 11:53 AM
dcannon003 dcannon003 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 23
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

my firearms purchase has been delayed since 10/8/2012...i went ahead and got my firearms record review and was told theres theres a couple arrests on my record frm 20 and 30 yrs ago...both dismissed...i have in the last month received my Utah and Florida CCW permits...an attorney told me to just wait for them to release my purchase...that was 2 months ago...the firearms record review came wth a blank form "claim of alleged inaccuracy or incompleteness"...but i dont want make any mistakes or fill it out wrong and make things worse...i live in the SFV...anybody kno what i should do?
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 01-08-2013, 2:14 PM
sevendayweekend sevendayweekend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 623
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

i have a question regarding dros denials -

if the buyer of a firearm is delayed through the dros process what becomes of the firearm? can the seller get it back?


also, would a buyer that has had their dros delayed have to reapply & pay every 30 days until finally getting the thumbs up?


thanks for any input
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 01-08-2013, 2:35 PM
gigglemonkee's Avatar
gigglemonkee gigglemonkee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North San Diego
Posts: 1,525
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sevendayweekend View Post
i have a question regarding dros denials -

if the buyer of a firearm is delayed through the dros process what becomes of the firearm? can the seller get it back?


also, would a buyer that has had their dros delayed have to reapply & pay every 30 days until finally getting the thumbs up?


thanks for any input
The 30 days is frozen while delayed. Once it comes back ok you have 30 days to pick up. I have been on delay since the 19th and asked the same thing. Funny is I got my 03ffl two weeks earlier and picked up a gun on the 18th
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 01-08-2013, 3:16 PM
dcannon003 dcannon003 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 23
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

is that ph # to contact the calif DOJ firearms purchasing 916 227 3752 or 3747 ?
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 01-08-2013, 3:37 PM
sevendayweekend sevendayweekend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 623
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcannon003 View Post
is that ph # to contact the calif DOJ firearms purchasing 916 227 3752 or 3747 ?
the # they say to call now is 916-227-7527


thanks for the input monkee
how do you find out when you are clear? does the ffl call the buyer, or does the buyer have to check with the ffl periodicly?

Last edited by sevendayweekend; 01-08-2013 at 3:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 01-08-2013, 3:52 PM
gigglemonkee's Avatar
gigglemonkee gigglemonkee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North San Diego
Posts: 1,525
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sevendayweekend View Post
the # they say to call now is 916-227-7527


thanks for the input monkee
how do you find out when you are clear? does the ffl call the buyer, or does the buyer have to check with the ffl periodicly?
I was told to call back regularly and check but that the ffl is supposed to call you
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 01-08-2013, 3:54 PM
sevendayweekend sevendayweekend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 623
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gigglemonkee View Post
I was told to call back regularly and check but that the ffl is supposed to call you
cool, thanks
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 01-08-2013, 5:19 PM
S2000 S2000 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 98
iTrader: 2 / 71%
Default

I DROS'd an AR-15 on 12/16 and a CZ 75 Handgun on 12/22 and picked up both without issue.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 01-08-2013, 9:21 PM
Frozenguy's Avatar
Frozenguy Frozenguy is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SGV/IE
Posts: 6,064
iTrader: 56 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gigglemonkee View Post
Just called again 2 weeks into delay and have been told I just have to wait and the analysts will get to it when they get to it. Also any firearm purchases I do in meantime will automatically go into delay as well.
This is not exactly accurate. I have put in 4 different DROS.
First got delayed.
Second had no delay and all three fire arms were released to me
Third was delayed.
Fourth I have heard no word yet, still five days left on wait. We'll see.

All different stores, two are ppt's.
Interestingly enough, the two delayed dros were for AR rifles/lowers. The ones released were not AR type.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 01-08-2013, 9:31 PM
gigglemonkee's Avatar
gigglemonkee gigglemonkee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North San Diego
Posts: 1,525
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozenguy View Post
This is not exactly accurate. I have put in 4 different DROS.
First got delayed.
Second had no delay and all three fire arms were released to me
Third was delayed.
Fourth I have heard no word yet, still five days left on wait. We'll see.

All different stores, two are ppt's.
Interestingly enough, the two delayed dros were for AR rifles/lowers. The ones released were not AR type.
Mine is for a cz75 that is a ppt. I think it is linked to an open parking ticket because I cannot find anything else in my past that would affect it.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 01-09-2013, 10:33 AM
HOGDOG1955 HOGDOG1955 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,324
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

picked up a pistol yesterday and for the 2 hours i was there talkin people came pickin up, all on time, including ars
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 01-09-2013, 12:11 PM
thehummerguy's Avatar
thehummerguy thehummerguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 453
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default

My buddy who bought an AR from me has been on Hold since before the shooting...DOJ refused to tell him why as they cannot verify who he is over the phone, I have called only to be told "there is nothing he can do, it's our problem to find out why he is denied" I asked if he in fact can call to at least talk with the person handling his file...NO she said, lately the phones are forwarded to another dept because as DOJ stated " they are back logged"

My buddy now wants to cancel the deal....can I call the dealer and have them cancel the DROS process and get the Gun back without a DROS on myself?
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 01-09-2013, 12:45 PM
PlayHard's Avatar
PlayHard PlayHard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 205
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default

On my 80th day in DROS now. My buddy who is a State Investigator pulled my record and there is nothing, at this time, that would prevent my approval.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 01-09-2013, 12:50 PM
frankm's Avatar
frankm frankm is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Occupied Vespuchia
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 25 / 100%
Default

Drosed a pistol, ten days, no problem.
__________________
RKBA Clock: soap box, ballot box, jury box, cartridge box (expanded right 4/16/14)
"Socialism can be a useful servant, but is a cruel master"
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 01-10-2013, 9:37 PM
grant d grant d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Message

Message
My recent firearm transfer (10/30/2012) has been delayed. The reason i was told was a change in criteria because of a arrest in 1994( no conviction no trial and no disposition)Not to make light of this arrest,but the case had no merit as i was certainly the victim Please excuse my honesty if inappropriate) the records and any court documents of that arrest including any disposition has been purged. I have had a successful transfer of a handgun as recent as july of 2012. I have received fom your clerk a petition to seal and destroy adult arrest records but these records have been purged.(Your clerks response was to contact my assemblyman? in my district.) futhermore I was told although there was a delay on this purchase I could still legally possess firearms.OK There being no reason to believe prior to this delay (transfer in july of 2012) I completed a sale on gun brokers.com from a FFL for the amount of $1300.00 on 10/30/2012 The firearm was shipped to a local FFL. There is no returning this Firearm as all sales are final. OK im all about sealing arrest records so i can be able to PURCHASE firearms in the future,since i am able to possess firearms according to the DOJ,i would prefer to go FORWARD by having this transfer started again in my spouses name. MY FFL dealer says he cannot do this without something in writing from the DOJ verifing I can posess firearms (because we reside at the same address)to satisfy ATF regulations paperwork? (straw purchase??)Please give my situation the attention it deserves. THANK YOU!! Sincerely, Grant M. Dorsey
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:55 PM
Citadelonline Citadelonline is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 115
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
The reason i was told was a change in criteria because of a arrest in 1994( no conviction no trial and no disposition)Not to make light of this arrest,but the case had no merit as i was certainly the victim Please excuse my honesty if inappropriate) the records and any court documents of that arrest including any disposition has been purged.
The CA DOJ has been asking for the final dispositions of arrest records when it can not determine one from their records.

Whether the case had merit or not is irrelevant. If the arrest record was expunged, the state may still be able to see the arrest but not the final disposal of your case.
Was the arrest in CA? If so contact a CA attorney who will be able to petition the court for the appropriate record that shows you were not convicted of a crime.

In my opinion this would be more productive and safer than requesting a formal opinion from the DOJ as to your legal status regarding the possession of a firearm.

Last edited by Citadelonline; 01-10-2013 at 11:10 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 01-11-2013, 7:57 AM
Frozenguy's Avatar
Frozenguy Frozenguy is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SGV/IE
Posts: 6,064
iTrader: 56 / 100%
Default

Woo hoo!! My S&W MP15 lowers have finally been released to me after 14 days past the 10 day wait.
Just waiting for a call from the other store releasing my KD lowers.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 01-11-2013, 8:13 AM
tcrpe's Avatar
tcrpe tcrpe is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 10,272
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

"Change in Criteria"
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 01-11-2013, 1:49 PM
clbshooter clbshooter is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Punta Gorda Fl. !!!!!
Posts: 380
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I also want to know what "change in criteria" means. What the DOJ is doing should be against the law PERIOD.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 01-11-2013, 1:51 PM
mrdd mrdd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,675
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clbshooter View Post
I also want to know what "change in criteria" means. What the DOJ is doing should be against the law PERIOD.
Unfortunately, it does not appear to be against the law.

The law merely states the minimum waiting period, but there is no statutory maximum.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 01-11-2013, 2:23 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,407
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
Unfortunately, it does not appear to be against the law.

The law merely states the minimum waiting period, but there is no statutory maximum.
We don't agree with your analysis.

-Brandon
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 01-11-2013, 2:43 PM
PlayHard's Avatar
PlayHard PlayHard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 205
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default

82nd day in DROS and got a call from my DOJ contact. We have been waiting on an update in DOJ records so the DROS can be approved. To date (from Oct 22 2012) DOJ records have not been updated . . . DROS is still in delay. Contacted a Calguns recommended attorney and told to file a Form 8706 - “Claim of Inaccuracy or Incompleteness”, with a certified copy of my local court change in status. All this could be another long wait, but I am fighting for my 2nd Amendment right as a legal person who can own a firearm.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 01-11-2013, 2:55 PM
mrdd mrdd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,675
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildhawker View Post
We don't agree with your analysis.

-Brandon
I hope I am wrong, but I cannot see where a maximum is spelled out in the law.

I guess it would be asking too much for you to explain?
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 01-11-2013, 3:01 PM
BumBum's Avatar
BumBum BumBum is offline
Corn-fed and Iowa-bred
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 1,414
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

I DROS'd an AR-15 just before Christmas, and picked it up without delay on 1/2/13. Not even a delay with two state holidays during the waiting period.
__________________

DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is general in nature, which may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances, and is intended for informational purposes only. Consistent with Calguns policy, the information does not constitute legal advice or opinions and should not be relied upon as such. Transmission of the information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon any information in my posts without seeking professional counsel.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 01-11-2013, 5:13 PM
kemasa's Avatar
kemasa kemasa is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 6,977
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
I hope I am wrong, but I cannot see where a maximum is spelled out in the law.

I guess it would be asking too much for you to explain?
I am not a lawyer, but how would you feel if the CA DOJ just started marking every single DROS as delayed? Do you think that would be a problem? If that is a problem, then what percentage would not be a problem? There needs to be a valid reason for the delay, not just that they have not gotten around to it. As far as I know, they don't have any proof of a problem, but they are attempting to force people to prove that they are innocent.
__________________
Kemasa.
FFL Transfer/Special Order Dealer since 1993.
Net-FFL list maintainer.

Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 01-12-2013, 3:44 AM
mrdd mrdd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,675
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemasa View Post
I am not a lawyer, but how would you feel if the CA DOJ just started marking every single DROS as delayed? Do you think that would be a problem? If that is a problem, then what percentage would not be a problem? There needs to be a valid reason for the delay, not just that they have not gotten around to it. As far as I know, they don't have any proof of a problem, but they are attempting to force people to prove that they are innocent.
I understand. Let me be more specific: what they are doing does not appear to violate the state laws concerning the waiting period. I understand it likely violates various parts of the U.S. Constitution: equal protection, due process, as well as rights under the 2nd amendment.

Challenging the constitutional aspects is fairly involved, as we all know.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 01-12-2013, 8:21 AM
SpaceMan's Avatar
SpaceMan SpaceMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 823
iTrader: 60 / 100%
Default

I DROS'd a couple firearms this year, no problems at all. I've also sold a couple firearms this year and the buyers have had no such issues. My last DROS was in November, I am going for another DROS on Monday for a lever action.

A buddy if mine in AZ recently purchased a handgun. He received a DELAY. As far as I understand, DOJ only has 48 hours to either release the firearm into your possetion or deny you. If they do not contact the FFL in 48 hours the FFL has to release the firearm to you.
__________________
WTB:
M&P 45, Glock 20sf, matched AR10 receivers, benelli M2 field, Rock Island M5
Power pistol, Accurate no. 7, Green Dot

WFT for 300 Blackout
.400/.401 Projectiles up to 180gr
.452 Projectiles 200gr - 230gr
.458/.459Projectiles 300 gr - 405 gr
45-70 & .450 Marlin brass
Large/Small Pistol & Large Rifle Primers
Updated: 4/16/2016
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 01-12-2013, 8:38 AM
Gabriel80's Avatar
Gabriel80 Gabriel80 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 436
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceMan View Post
I DROS'd a couple firearms this year, no problems at all. I've also sold a couple firearms this year and the buyers have had no such issues. My last DROS was in November, I am going for another DROS on Monday for a lever action.

A buddy if mine in AZ recently purchased a handgun. He received a DELAY. As far as I understand, DOJ only has 48 hours to either release the firearm into your possetion or deny you. If they do not contact the FFL in 48 hours the FFL has to release the firearm to you.
Is that in AZ? I drosed a handgun last year before the panic. And the release wasn't delayed until the 10th day. My FFL showed me the time stamp on the email of when they processed it and it was literally the last minute. I had to jump through some pointless hoops about a misdemeanor trespassing charge that was dropped 12 years ago and they released the pistol on the 11th or 12th day.

With my ak47 set to release on Monday I am nervous (hopefully for no reason besides paranoia) it will be smooth. It's been over a week and no bad news from FFL yet but being what happened before I have no confidence in the DOJ anymore.

Fingers crossed!!
__________________
none of us are as strong as all of us
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:13 AM
kemasa's Avatar
kemasa kemasa is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 6,977
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
I understand. Let me be more specific: what they are doing does not appear to violate the state laws concerning the waiting period. I understand it likely violates various parts of the U.S. Constitution: equal protection, due process, as well as rights under the 2nd amendment.

Challenging the constitutional aspects is fairly involved, as we all know.
Change your view, where does the law allow for the CA DOJ to decide to delay the transfer when they don't have any information that you are prohibited. Just because a person was arrested does not mean that they are prohibited. If they were convicted, there would be a record, but it seems that the DOJ is instead demanding proof that they are innocent. An arrest from years ago would have been a conviction OR dropped/not-guilty, it would not be pending.
__________________
Kemasa.
FFL Transfer/Special Order Dealer since 1993.
Net-FFL list maintainer.

Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 01-12-2013, 4:00 PM
edwardm's Avatar
edwardm edwardm is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tacoma!
Posts: 1,787
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
I hope I am wrong, but I cannot see where a maximum is spelled out in the law.

I guess it would be asking too much for you to explain?
I'm not sure what Brandon is getting at, since he has insights I don't have. That said, I'd wander off the reservation and not immediately look to statute. I would instead look at things that 'substantially burden' a fundamental right.

Then there is the question of performance of ministerial duties and whether those duties are performed appropriately. I haven't really thought that one out deeply, but it might make for an interesting private cause of action.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 01-12-2013, 6:39 PM
mrdd mrdd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,675
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kemasa View Post
Change your view, where does the law allow for the CA DOJ to decide to delay the transfer when they don't have any information that you are prohibited. Just because a person was arrested does not mean that they are prohibited. If they were convicted, there would be a record, but it seems that the DOJ is instead demanding proof that they are innocent. An arrest from years ago would have been a conviction OR dropped/not-guilty, it would not be pending.
I understand what you are saying and I agree completely. I think this situation stinks. My point is that the state law is very vague about how the background check is performed. Actually, that is an understatement: the law does not spell out anything about the process. And this is why they are getting away with what they are doing now.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 01-12-2013, 7:58 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,407
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
I guess it would be asking too much for you to explain?
It would be at this time. Two weeks...

-Brandon
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:59 PM
One78Shovel's Avatar
One78Shovel One78Shovel is offline
NRA Life Member
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Under A Rock
Posts: 2,984
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel80 View Post
Me too! Anyone pick up an AR or AK when they're supposed to? Anyone dros anything at the end of 2012 and get it in 10 or 11 days?

I've never been convicted of a crime. I own 5 firearms, the last one I drosed was delayed by 1 (or 2?) days, which was far early last year (pre panic and back up). I believe the delay was a mistake, or "just making sure" as DOJ said.

I've got my 6th firearm in jail right now (my first "black rifle") and for some reason I'm paranoid it will be caught up in delay. I really have nothing that would make me inelligible from clearing but we all know how busy DOJ is.

My pick up date is Jan 14th and I'm pretty excited/nervous, anyone care to share a recent, positive and smooth, normal experience?
I had no issues. Picked it up 7 Jan.

-178S
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 01-13-2013, 9:56 AM
kemasa's Avatar
kemasa kemasa is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 6,977
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
I guess it would be asking too much for you to explain?
BTW, it is best to remember that this forum is PUBLIC. This means that you have to assume that anyone and everyone is reading this and I know that the CA DOJ and BATF have people who read these forums.

This means that you don't want certain aspects made public so that the other side can plan a defense or bogus claim in advance of any action. While you might want to know, it does not serve the best interest of yourself, as well as others, for those who are involved in taking action to publicly post their game plan.
__________________
Kemasa.
FFL Transfer/Special Order Dealer since 1993.
Net-FFL list maintainer.

Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:15 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.