Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2012, 11:37 PM
miggyv's Avatar
miggyv miggyv is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Anaheim, Kalifornistan
Posts: 139
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default Pena v Cid Update

I found this tidbit of information on the Pena v Cid case:

No. 09-1185
State of California
Challenging law prohibiting the sale of any unsafe handgun (any handgun not included on a state roster of handguns meeting certain safety requirements). After the parties filed a joint status report on 7/30/12, the court issued an order lifting the stay that had been in place pending the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Nordyke v. King. The parties have agreed to withdraw any motions that were pending at the time of the stay. Discovery is to be completed by 5/3/13, and dispositive motions are due by 6/28/13.

Looks like the stay was lifted(finally) and the case might be moving forward. Can any legally savvy Calgunners elaborate on what happens next?
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:44 PM
wash's Avatar
wash wash is offline
Calguns Addict
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sillycon valley
Posts: 9,018
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Blog Entries: 13

More waiting.

Originally Posted by oaklander
Dear Kevin,

You suck!!! Your are wrong!!! Stop it!!!
Proud CGF and CGN donor. SAF life member. Former CRPA member. Gpal beta tester (it didn't work). NRA member.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 4:23 AM
voiceofreason's Avatar
voiceofreason voiceofreason is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,782
iTrader: 20 / 100%

I'm not legally savvy. I am not legal counsel.

I'd guess that OC will ask for an extension on the delivery of discovery, then deliver a 1/2 a**ed, incomplete and evasive discovery late, then force Pena's counsel to file a Motion to Compel for a more comprehensive discovery.

This will push the case past 08/13 or so before discovery is completed. If OC wants to drag this case on, they will succeed in doing so.

This court may punt and issue another stay based on a different case (from Nordyke) later down the line. If the court is reluctant to hear this case, they will succeed in dragging this case on down the road.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 6:06 AM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,856
iTrader: 15 / 100%

If you look beyond CGN, there is lots of informtion available on the Calguns Foundation website...
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host., the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved. and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to