Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > CONCEALED CARRY/LICENSE TO CARRY > Calguns Concealed Carry County Information Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Calguns Concealed Carry County Information Forum Information on how to get a LTC in yourCounty

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2010, 10:55 PM
Gray Peterson's Avatar
Gray Peterson Gray Peterson is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,819
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Thumbs up San Diego -- APPLY to Get a Spot in Line

While Sheriff Gore decided not to appeal the decision of the three judge panel, several other parties, including the California Attorney General, filed motions to intervene in the case, as well as petitions for rehearing en banc with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On February 28, 2014, the Ninth Circuit granted a stay in the case. Since that time, the Ninth Circuit has sought briefing on various issues, with the most recent pleadings being filed by December 24, 2014. On March 26, 2015 Chief Judge Thomas of the Ninth Circuit issued an order for the case to be heard en banc by the full Ninth Circuit.

Given the status of the case with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the fact that there are other procedural steps before the court’s decision becomes final, the Sheriff’s Department’s policies and procedures remain in effect and are unchanged.

The Sheriff’s Department continues to process CCW applications for those applicants that meet the current legal requirement to show good cause.

Applications for CCW’s based on the cause of “personal protection” may be dropped off at the Sheriff’s License Division and will be held in abeyance until the Ninth Circuit has completed its analysis of the issue.

Should the case be decided on the basis of “personal protection,” the Sheriff’s Department will begin to process applications held in abeyance in the order that they were received. Applicants will be contacted by the Sheriff’s Licensing Division with instructions on how to complete the process.


From:
http://www.sdsheriff.net/licensing/ccw.html

Last edited by Paladin; 01-03-2016 at 2:26 PM.. Reason: added thumbs up symbol and revised title
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2010, 2:45 PM
jtyner's Avatar
jtyner jtyner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oceanside
Posts: 565
iTrader: 55 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildhawker View Post
...our intention is to contact you volunteers with specific instructions on how to proceed as we move forward with case development. Not everyone will be tasked with the same thing, and timing will be unique to each county.
So... stand by?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2010, 2:50 PM
Casual_Shooter's Avatar
Casual_Shooter Casual_Shooter is offline
Ban Hammer Avoidance Team
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Did you notice how far over I've moved this part of my info? You should try it, it's fun.
Posts: 9,338
iTrader: 49 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
...
_ _ _
__________________
Guns, dogs and home alarms. Opponents are all of a sudden advocates once their personal space is violated.

"Those who cannot remember the posts are condemned to repeat them"

I wish I had a dollar for every time someone used a cliché
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2010, 11:27 PM
N6ATF N6ATF is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East San Diego County, CA
Posts: 8,389
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casual_Shooter View Post
_ _ _
...

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2010, 11:00 PM
jshoebot's Avatar
jshoebot jshoebot is offline
Senior Member
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 1,866
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

I'm also waiting for orders!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2010, 6:05 AM
Todd98SE Todd98SE is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: El Cajon
Posts: 97
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Ready and waiting sir.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:23 PM
McCrown McCrown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 417
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

2 weeks? Right?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2010, 5:21 PM
craneman's Avatar
craneman craneman is offline
Gold Member...Oh Behave!
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,253
iTrader: 29 / 100%
Default

Late showing up, but ready for instructions.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2010, 6:01 PM
GMG's Avatar
GMG GMG is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: El Cajon, CA.
Posts: 7,469
iTrader: 131 / 100%
Default

Just received the message!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-21-2010, 12:29 AM
chewy352 chewy352 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 163
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMG View Post
Just received the message!
What message? I got the email of just the main release but no specific instructions for San Diego.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-21-2010, 2:19 PM
horsetrader horsetrader is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Escondido
Posts: 3
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

awaiting orders, sir.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-21-2010, 2:42 PM
grammaton76's Avatar
grammaton76 grammaton76 is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,540
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

You know, folks, you can subscribe without posting to the thread. We don't need to fill the first several pages with "I'm here" and "let me know", etc etc.

Just click "thread tools" and then "subscribe" from the drop-down menu right above the top post.
__________________
Primary author of gunwiki.net - 'like' it on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Gunwiki/242578512591 to see whenever new content gets added!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-22-2010, 8:36 AM
Untamed1972 Untamed1972 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,326
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Does anyone know if SDSO does neighbor interviews as part of the application investigation?
__________________
"Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

Quote for the day:
Quote:
"..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:11 AM
Rossi357's Avatar
Rossi357 Rossi357 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sandy Eggo County
Posts: 1,229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Which course of action in SD County will get shall issue to happen sooner? Ed's case in Fed court, or this action using the good cause statments.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:12 AM
Gray Peterson's Avatar
Gray Peterson Gray Peterson is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,819
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rossi357 View Post
Which course of action in SD County will get shall issue to happen sooner? Ed's case in Fed court, or this action using the good cause statments.
Well, the point of this drill is to basically get the counties into statutory compliance.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:16 AM
Casual_Shooter's Avatar
Casual_Shooter Casual_Shooter is offline
Ban Hammer Avoidance Team
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Did you notice how far over I've moved this part of my info? You should try it, it's fun.
Posts: 9,338
iTrader: 49 / 100%
Default

Sorry to sound dense... but can you point me to the instructions for this "drill". I've donated to my county, but is there something else I'm supposed to be doing?
__________________
Guns, dogs and home alarms. Opponents are all of a sudden advocates once their personal space is violated.

"Those who cannot remember the posts are condemned to repeat them"

I wish I had a dollar for every time someone used a cliché
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:21 AM
Rossi357's Avatar
Rossi357 Rossi357 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sandy Eggo County
Posts: 1,229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casual_Shooter View Post
Sorry to sound dense... but can you point me to the instructions for this "drill". I've donated to my county, but is there something else I'm supposed to be doing?
I think we are waiting for accepted good cause statements. Then we will be advised on a course of action.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-11-2010, 5:40 PM
loather loather is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: escondido, ca
Posts: 910
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I'm currently reading through the San Diego requirements. In there, it states that we'd be required to submit character references. Are they legally allowed to do that? Additionally, it states further down that character references generally aren't required for judges, former law enforcement, and SO reserves. Doesn't this run afoul of equal protection?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-12-2010, 1:15 AM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,418
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loather View Post
I'm currently reading through the San Diego requirements. In there, it states that we'd be required to submit character references. Are they legally allowed to do that? Additionally, it states further down that character references generally aren't required for judges, former law enforcement, and SO reserves. Doesn't this run afoul of equal protection?
No, and yes.
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-12-2010, 5:29 AM
budprop budprop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santee
Posts: 191
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildhawker View Post
No, and yes.
Uhhhh.... ok, good answer, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-12-2010, 6:55 AM
loather loather is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: escondido, ca
Posts: 910
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildhawker View Post
No, and yes.
Excellent. I'm available and willing to make waves if need be.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-12-2010, 8:01 AM
Untamed1972 Untamed1972 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,326
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loather View Post
I'm currently reading through the San Diego requirements. In there, it states that we'd be required to submit character references. Are they legally allowed to do that? Additionally, it states further down that character references generally aren't required for judges, former law enforcement, and SO reserves. Doesn't this run afoul of equal protection?
Where they make it even stickier is they require the references to be from SD county residents, which is in effect a de facto length of residency requirement.

As for the LEOs I can see why they would exempt them only in they they've had a far more detailed and indepth background investgation done on them already which would provide and investigator FAR more info to look at then is contained on the standard DOJ app. Not saying I agree with it, just that I can see why.

But even for a full LEO background investigation letters are not required, only contact info for the references. It seems a pointless exercise to require the letters if the investigator is going to contact them personally for further interview anyway.
__________________
"Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

Quote for the day:
Quote:
"..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2010, 10:08 AM
GuyW GuyW is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,303
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untamed1972 View Post

As for the LEOs I can see why they would exempt them only in they they've had a far more detailed and indepth background investgation done on them already which would provide and investigator FAR more info to look at then is contained on the standard DOJ app. Not saying I agree with it, just that I can see why.
And everyone knows that's a reasonable approach, as evidenced by the investigations of Craig Peyer, the Oceanside sex-Chippie (Carabahlo ??), the SDPD officer that trashed his Murrietta (?) house, etc etc etc

.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-03-2010, 1:10 PM
sd_shooter's Avatar
sd_shooter sd_shooter is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,931
iTrader: 72 / 100%
Default

bump
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-10-2010, 2:22 PM
sd_shooter's Avatar
sd_shooter sd_shooter is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,931
iTrader: 72 / 100%
Default

Ok, since Peruta is now over (at least Round 1), is it time to apply yet... or still just time to sit back and wait?

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-13-2010, 12:18 PM
J.D.Allen J.D.Allen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loather View Post
I'm currently reading through the San Diego requirements. In there, it states that we'd be required to submit character references. Are they legally allowed to do that? Additionally, it states further down that character references generally aren't required for judges, former law enforcement, and SO reserves. Doesn't this run afoul of equal protection?
This is nothing. In Imperial county they require reference letters to be from LEO's. So if you don't know any quite well, you're just SOL.
__________________
"Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool that follows him?"-Obi Wan Kenobi

the question here is not whether the carrying of arms is a good idea—the question is
whether carrying arms is constitutionally protected. Objective standards and due process—not
Defendants’ philosophy or personal beliefs about the value of this activity—must carry the day-Alan Gura
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-14-2010, 12:43 PM
3013 3013 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Funds sent. Transaction ID: 4655-0222-2478-9879

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-12-2010, 6:58 AM
guns4life's Avatar
guns4life guns4life is offline
JUICEBAG
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In a van...down by the river.
Posts: 4,874
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I'm ready to go, just say the word and I'll submit my paperwork.
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-16-2010, 7:19 AM
Crom's Avatar
Crom Crom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,632
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Okay, so How do we get San Diego Sheriff's Office to drop the illegal three character reference letters? Is Jason Davis going to send them a nasty letter anytime soon?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-16-2010, 8:02 AM
Untamed1972 Untamed1972 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,326
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crom View Post
Okay, so How do we get San Diego Sheriff's Office to drop the illegal three character reference letters? Is Jason Davis going to send them a nasty letter anytime soon?
^^


Also, to combat that counties claims that they approve 90% of all applicants, I'm thinkin' its close to being time for a that SD CCW application day with a couple of hundred "GC = Self Defense" apps so at a minimum we can start racking up some denials, but I'm willing to wait a month to see what the judge has to say in the Peruta decision.
__________________
"Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

Quote for the day:
Quote:
"..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-16-2010, 1:57 PM
grammaton76's Avatar
grammaton76 grammaton76 is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,540
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untamed1972 View Post
Also, to combat that counties claims that they approve 90% of all applicants, I'm thinkin' its close to being time for a that SD CCW application day with a couple of hundred "GC = Self Defense" apps so at a minimum we can start racking up some denials, but I'm willing to wait a month to see what the judge has to say in the Peruta decision.
The only time it's close to, is time for us on the sidelines (myself included) to sit down, shut up, and wait patiently to see what CGF requests of us.

I really don't think we'll ever have a "racking up mass denials" drive. Any denials being pursued will most likely need to be from disabled, minority, gay, etc complainants in the event that the suit has to escalate into appeals. Anyone who would be useful for a denial, has probably already been contacted.

The rest of us on the sidelines are only useful for two things: financial contributions, or eventually helping run CCW application drives once SDSO has been forced to cave in.
__________________
Primary author of gunwiki.net - 'like' it on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Gunwiki/242578512591 to see whenever new content gets added!

Last edited by grammaton76; 11-16-2010 at 2:18 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-17-2010, 8:30 AM
Untamed1972 Untamed1972 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,326
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grammaton76 View Post
The only time it's close to, is time for us on the sidelines (myself included) to sit down, shut up, and wait patiently to see what CGF requests of us.

I really don't think we'll ever have a "racking up mass denials" drive. Any denials being pursued will most likely need to be from disabled, minority, gay, etc complainants in the event that the suit has to escalate into appeals. Anyone who would be useful for a denial, has probably already been contacted.

The rest of us on the sidelines are only useful for two things: financial contributions, or eventually helping run CCW application drives once SDSO has been forced to cave in.
Thank you for further marginalizing "heterosexual white males" as the only persons in our society who are "non-class" citizens. For the purpose of picking plaintiffs I understand the value of extra flavor of certain types of people. But simply for the purpose of filling the sheriff's files with denials for lack of GC so they cant claim a 90% approval rate, why does it matter who they are? Then from those denials you pick the best for plaintiffs.

The usefulness of statistics on denials was not of my own creation. And personally sitting in the courtroom listening to County counsel boast of their "90% approval rate" leads me to believe there is some validity to the value of the stats.

Not to mention did I say anything about "screw CFG and lets all go apply?" There has been plenty of indication that depending on Peruta outcome, the call for SD applicants is coming very soon.
__________________
"Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

Quote for the day:
Quote:
"..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun

Last edited by Untamed1972; 11-17-2010 at 8:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-17-2010, 8:57 AM
Gray Peterson's Avatar
Gray Peterson Gray Peterson is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,819
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untamed1972 View Post
Thank you for further marginalizing "heterosexual white males" as the only persons in our society who are "non-class" citizens.
Otis McDonald was not an accident. Deanna Sykes is not an accident. Shelly Parker (who should have been the national symbol of overturning the DC handgun ban had it not been for the Navegar standard) is not an accident. Tom Palmer (of Palmer v. DC) is not an accident. My case is not an accident. These are all well planned cases with specifically sympathetic plaintiffs due to their circumstances. They are the most "politically correct", regardless of your own misgivings as to the underpinnings of that belief.

That being said, symbol plaintiffs are less important to a writ of mandate case because it's a state statutory law issue.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-10-2010, 2:59 PM
Anti-Hero's Avatar
Anti-Hero Anti-Hero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,573
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Isn't that what Peruta tried to do, and was dismissed?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-10-2010, 3:14 PM
sd_shooter's Avatar
sd_shooter sd_shooter is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,931
iTrader: 72 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Hero View Post
Isn't that what Peruta tried to do, and was dismissed?
That's what I thought too.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-10-2010, 6:34 PM
blakdawg's Avatar
blakdawg blakdawg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Butte/Santa Clara counties
Posts: 1,505
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

That's correct - but what the ruling in Peruta said was that the plaintiffs hadn't done a good enough job showing that their circumstances were identical to those of people who were approved.

This is what the court said:

Quote:
Plaintiffs submitted more than 700 pages of applications and renewals. Id. The court observed that “some applicants were granted concealed weapons licenses after stating on paper basically the same grounds for issuance upon which plaintiffs’ applications were denied.” Id. Nonetheless, the court held there was no genuine issue of material fact because the records did not establish those who received licenses were similarly situated to plaintiffs. Id. The records were incomplete—they did not reveal information compiled in background checks, oral interviews and the like—and the records did not establish a causal connection between factors suggesting “privileged class” and the issuance of a concealed weapons license. Id. The court concluded that, “without evidence of anything more than vagaries in [] administration,” plaintiffs equal protection claim could not survive summary judgment. Id.

Like the plaintiffs in March, Plaintiffs here cannot demonstrate they were treated differently than similarly situated others. To show disparate treatment, Plaintiffs have offered a number of HDSA renewal applications as a contrast to Plaintiffs initial applications. See Exs. U-PP. But the two types of applications are not comparable; renewal applications are generally issued on the spot and subject to less rigorous documentation requirements than initial applications. See Pelowitz Decl. ¶ 12. Just one of the Plaintiffs contends his renewal was denied, and in that case, the renewal was granted following an appeal. See Exs. K-S. Accordingly, the evidence introduced by Plaintiffs does not establish or create a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether similarly situated individuals were treated differently. At most, it demonstrates “vagaries in [] administration.” See March, 2001 WL 1112110, at *5 (N.D.Cal. 2001). Moreover, for the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs have not demonstrated the denials of concealed weapons licenses to them were based on impermissible grounds. Defendant’s policy does not favor HDSA members in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
,, so it's not just good enough to copy someone else's good cause statement and wait for approval - at least not today in San Diego County.
__________________
"[T]he liberties of the American people [are] dependent upon the ballot-box, the jury-box, and the cartridge-box . . without these no class of people could live and flourish in this country." -- Frederick Douglass (1892)
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-10-2010, 9:01 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,418
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

Our Initiative continues unimpeded and full steam ahead. Stay tuned!

In the meantime, try to find a few vendors willing to support their customers' civil rights and sponsor Carry License Reform in that area. We need all the help we can get.
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-12-2010, 5:20 PM
Skullster's Avatar
Skullster Skullster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 281
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I sent in my $100 to sponsor San Diego County today. Transaction ID: 3PF4353207094452L
__________________


Luke 22:36 And He said to them, but now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-20-2010, 11:08 AM
fighting4theconstitution's Avatar
fighting4theconstitution fighting4theconstitution is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 82
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

I applied and received mine in about 4-5 months after all the paperwork, fees and shooting took place. And all that with the current sheriff in office.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-29-2010, 1:41 PM
J.D.Allen J.D.Allen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fighting4theconstitution View Post
I applied and received mine in about 4-5 months after all the paperwork, fees and shooting took place. And all that with the current sheriff in office.
Care to share your angle?
__________________
"Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool that follows him?"-Obi Wan Kenobi

the question here is not whether the carrying of arms is a good idea—the question is
whether carrying arms is constitutionally protected. Objective standards and due process—not
Defendants’ philosophy or personal beliefs about the value of this activity—must carry the day-Alan Gura
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:38 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.