09-28-2012, 2:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 337
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by meaty-btz
Wait so.. do.. crap. I admit it, was this a tactical move on Brown's part or am I giving him too much credit? Because it would be brilliant political move, it true, talk about pandering to two opposing sides at once.
EDIT
NO NO NO, that is referring to the alterations to 16520 (firearms definitions) as prescribed in 1366 only if both bills are passed. So only the definitions of a firearm in 16520 are unaltered, the ban stands.
|
Thanks I was confused.
|