View Single Post
  #155  
Old 12-13-2017, 7:30 AM
caliguy93's Avatar
caliguy93 caliguy93 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: North Koreafornia
Posts: 977
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyxcom View Post
Not trying to argue, but how so?

The law has defined that on Jan 1 2017 my BB bullpup that was otherwise legal on Dec 31 2016 is now classified as an assault weapon.

The law ALSO states that the same rifle on the same day is now an assault weapon because the OAL, which is NOW measured from the end of the buttstock to end of the barrel, or permanently attached muzzle device, is less than 30".

Maybe there is some nuance regarding the AW possession exemption between the BB and the OAL, but I can't see how declaring it is under 30" per the CURRENT definition is harmful.
It’s written right into the statute...

Quote:
12276.1 (a) Notwithstanding Section 12276, "assault weapon" shall also mean any of the following:
1. A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
A. A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon.
B. A thumbhole stock.
C. A folding or telescoping stock.
D. A grenade launcher or flare launcher.
E. A flash suppressor.
F. A forward pistol grip.
2. A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
3. A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches.
The new regs changed the definition of how to measure the OAL, but if you check the box stating your rifle is under 30” and subsequently send photos demonstrating so, it is admitting to violating the statute in bold.

Last edited by caliguy93; 12-13-2017 at 7:32 AM..
Reply With Quote