View Single Post
  #232  
Old 02-23-2012, 6:30 AM
atomicwedgy's Avatar
atomicwedgy atomicwedgy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 215
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by One78Shovel View Post
Your question as applied to the released statements.

IMO- I would think simply stated "Self Defense" GC's, without further explanation noted as required, would represent the basic need for self defense which would include any current or future threats.

Not certain where Sheriff Dean stands in regard to equitable acceptance of GC statements or moral character.

The go/no go criteria applied to GC's should be an easy benchmark to understand. As the released statements show, a "Self Defense" justification is acceptable. It's the moral character aspect that Dean has the most wiggle room and becomes concerning if applicant is denied and meets following criteria-

- Has no felony convictions
- Is not a prohibitive person from owing firearms
- Has passed recent DOJ background checks for purchase of firearms
- Passed background checks from other States & obtained non- resident LTC's

If an applicant meets documented acceptable GC such as '"Self Defense", and meets the before mentioned moral character bullets, then one must question why there are inconsistency's in the approval process.

That may just be for the courts to decide.

-178S
Has there been a CGF volunteer test case yet? With a declined identical good cause, are there plans to bring suit? Are we waiting for Peruta? Nordyke?