View Single Post
  #140  
Old 04-25-2013, 12:00 AM
Gray Peterson's Avatar
Gray Peterson Gray Peterson is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,817
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyinrwanda View Post
Sure. But that's not civil litigation anymore. And the constitutional issues would still be indistinguishable from Richards and Peruta.
No U.S. court in the post-Heller regime has ever ruled that one or another manner of carry is the “protected right.” Nor has any reputable scholar, litigator or other legal commentator suggested that the Second Amendment prescribes any particular manner of carry. Even the handful of court opinions favorable towards public carry (Woolard and Moore) were remarkably circumspect in their pronouncements on the scope of the Second Amendment; they were totally silent on permissible manner regulations.

And no, quoting another opinion does not mean that the current opinion accepts, imports or sustains the logic, reasoning or facts of the quoted opinion wholesale.

You are not employing logic. You're not even making interpretive leaps. This is pure fantasy driven by a willful ignorance of the law and by a manic investment in a particular outcome. While this “approach” is commonplace in political activism and can even be appropriate in legislative lobbying and issue advocacy, it is beyond counterproductive in litigation.
This may come as shocking, but I agree with you 100%.

The only people pushing the "OC is the right" tome are people with a vested interest in OC as the right, crazy people like Mr. Nichols.

Example, with Mr. Nichols:

Redondo Beach MTD

If you're charged in the state court system, and are still charged with something, Younger abstenion applies.
Reply With Quote