View Single Post
  #29  
Old 03-25-2013, 8:27 AM
RickD427's Avatar
RickD427 RickD427 is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: King County
Posts: 9,128
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwtt View Post
your understanding is wrong.
Sir,

Post #20 provided a citation to Penal Code section 18010(a) which allows prosecuting authorities to file civil actions to seize large capacity magazines.

Here is the text of 18010(b). This section better applies to LEOs and does allow for the seizure and summary destruction without having to file a court action.
"(b) These weapons shall be subject to confiscation and summary
destruction whenever found within the state." (with the same reference to large capacity magazines.)
The above posts make some good arguments about whether this law meets the requirements of "Due Process." My personal opinion is that is does not. But that is a battle that has not yet been fought and the winner not yet known.

For the present, Penal Code section 18010 still stands.
Reply With Quote