View Single Post
  #66  
Old 01-30-2013, 8:33 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Administrator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cottage Grove, OR
Posts: 44,441
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Librarian View Post

But I have a return question: If the answer to your question were 'yes, ARs would be inheritable', would you then post a thread in favor of the bill?

You might; can't predict what folks would do.

But in my opinion it does not matter what is in the bill. It must be opposed, just like all the other Federal and state bills inspired by gun-grabber politicians.

These bills will not be 'OK' for cowboy action shooters, will not 'benefit' duck hunters, will not 'encourage' long-range competitors.

These bills are not about their details. These bills are about crushing resistance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteSands View Post
A CalGuns Mod now plays devils advocate on members here.

Wow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ready_eSeVe View Post
WTH? I'm pretty sure he meant to point out that whether the answer was favorable or unfavorable to your circumstance, it shouldn't change your opposition to the bill.

Anyway, gift em to your children now. No paperwork would follow them (this changes next year IIRC).
Exactly.

It does not matter what is in the bill unless some provision is so much to your liking you would encourage your representatives to vote for the bill. Since I hope no one is so narrowly focused that s/he would support any of these bad bills, there is no point in worrying exactly what may be in them - until one should be sent to the President for signature.
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."

- Marcus Aurelius
Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.”

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.



Reply With Quote