View Single Post
  #20  
Old 12-12-2014, 2:20 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Administrator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 37,290
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

At 21
Quote:
But the decision below applied
a watered-down version of scrutiny even after
acknowledging that the San Francisco ordinance
burdens the very “core” of the Second Amendment
right. This case is thus a stark illustration of the
reality that, even after this Court’s admonishment
that the Second Amendment may not “be singled out
for special—and specially unfavorable—treatment,”
McDonald, 561 U.S. at 778-79, courts continue to do
just that. Whether through summary reversal or
plenary review, this Court should use this opportunity
to put an end to this disturbing trend.
That would be nice.
__________________
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice]

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.


Reply With Quote