View Single Post
Old 05-31-2008, 8:10 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 37,293
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6

Originally Posted by Decoligny View Post
Even if they were misreading it as concealable, it still states

(b) Carrying a concealed firearm in violation of this section is punishable, as follows:
The critical hurdle here is that the firearm must be concealed to invoke any part of 12025.

Even satisfying 12025(b)(6)(A) and (B), having a concealable weapon not registered to the bearer and also having ammunition for it, means nothing if that weapon were not concealed. Such unconcealed possession is not a crime (without the state Capitol or street gang crime or intent to commit a felony circumstances, all different sections from 12025).
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice]

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.

Reply With Quote