View Single Post
Old 10-13-2017, 9:38 AM
kcbrown's Avatar
kcbrown kcbrown is offline
Calguns Addict
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,633
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default Teixeira v. Alameda County: en banc LOSS 10/10/17

Originally Posted by FABIO GETS GOOSED!!! View Post
Nope, guess again lol. The panel decision was correct, until it wasn't.

What? Really? Are you SURE??

Because if that's the case, then the decision is arbitrary, since the law didn't change between the panel decision and the en banc decision.

You can't have it both ways. Either at most one of the decisions is correct across time as long as the law itself doesn't change, or the decision itself is arbitrary. Which is it?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

Last edited by kcbrown; 10-13-2017 at 10:40 AM..
Reply With Quote