View Single Post
Old 05-31-2008, 9:10 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 37,875
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6

Originally Posted by Decoligny View Post
Even if they were misreading it as concealable, it still states

(b) Carrying a concealed firearm in violation of this section is punishable, as follows:
The critical hurdle here is that the firearm must be concealed to invoke any part of 12025.

Even satisfying 12025(b)(6)(A) and (B), having a concealable weapon not registered to the bearer and also having ammunition for it, means nothing if that weapon were not concealed. Such unconcealed possession is not a crime (without the state Capitol or street gang crime or intent to commit a felony circumstances, all different sections from 12025).
No one will really understand politics until they understand that politicians are not trying to solve our problems. They are trying to solve their own problems - of which getting elected and re-elected are number one and number two. Whatever is number three is far behind.
- Thomas Sowell
I've been saying that for years ...

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.

Reply With Quote