View Single Post
Old 12-04-2012, 8:23 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 37,086
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6

Originally Posted by pa_carbon15 View Post
I was curious about that, so I went to the CA DOJ website and found this.
Particularly on the topic of 'assault weapons', the DOJ appears to have political motivations to be obnoxious in correcting their documents. They further decline to perform their duty to advise local law enforcement on the topic, but fall back on statements similar to 'there are 58 district attorneys in the State and they may interpret the law ... '

The DOJ is a poor source for general information; if one is in a position to ask a specific question and get a written answer from their legal resources, then the clarity is better. The people who answer phones on their public numbers are seldom lawyers, and should not be considered reliable.
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice]

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.

Reply With Quote