Originally Posted by Gray Peterson
He would not had a problem in re NY law if he had.
That doesn't necessarily follow.
Let me also remind everyone that Osterweil in district court was pro se litigation. Paul Clement may have represented at appeals, but district court was done by Osterweil.
Now that is something I did not
And it means that the real litmus test here is going to be how the 2nd Circuit rules on it.
I predict they will rule against Osterweil, in an attempt to narrow the scope of the 2nd Amendment as much as possible.