View Single Post
Old 12-04-2012, 10:16 AM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 6,169
iTrader: 0 / 0%

Originally Posted by kcbrown View Post
Osterweil v Bartlett acts as evidence otherwise.
Assuming that the cited case is relevant, you do understand that a sample of one case does not make a statistically supportable argument.

It may be evidence, but it is not convincing evidence.
CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Not qualified to give any legal opinion so pay attention at your own risk.