Originally Posted by Gray Peterson
Is there some sort of unofficial rule that I'm not aware of, that we're not supposed to question people's anonymity, especially when anonymous one asks for a bet?
There was an earlier event, to which Fabio alluded, resulting in a group of short bans for discussing any member's choice to maintain a 'handle' rather than overt identity. (Can't find the thread quickly - it was here in 2A.)
Either a member's contributions stand on their own, or they do not; such evaluation is a privilege of each reader.
There was also, IIRC, a short discussion of not being 'an occasion of sin' ...