View Single Post
  #123  
Old 12-02-2012, 11:56 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 35,904
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
Is there some sort of unofficial rule that I'm not aware of, that we're not supposed to question people's anonymity, especially when anonymous one asks for a bet?
There was an earlier event, to which Fabio alluded, resulting in a group of short bans for discussing any member's choice to maintain a 'handle' rather than overt identity. (Can't find the thread quickly - it was here in 2A.)

Either a member's contributions stand on their own, or they do not; such evaluation is a privilege of each reader.

There was also, IIRC, a short discussion of not being 'an occasion of sin' ...
__________________
Once again, we're in CA Bill Season.

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

Let us simply oppose them all - write, call, attend meetings with legislators and tell them they're wrong.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.