View Single Post
  #29  
Old 12-01-2012, 11:07 PM
strongpoint's Avatar
strongpoint strongpoint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Fran (west side)
Posts: 2,259
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagearms View Post
CGF will step up to defend just in case.
this is not quite what hoffmang said -- can != will. let's be clear about that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fate View Post
So...is it a grip rather than a stock?
why wouldn't it be both? there are plenty of stocks in the world on which the grip is integrated into the stock, not a separate component. couldn't you point to one section of a JAE stock, for instance, and say, "that's the grip"? could a prosecutor convince a jury (one not made up of discriminating firearm enthusiasts) of this?

let me ask the question from a different perspective: are we to infer that CGF now believes such stocks are not subject to SB23 restrictions on pistol grips?
__________________
"They seek to establish systems of government based on the regimentation of all human beings by a handful of individual rulers who have seized power by force. These men and their hypnotized followers call this a new order. It is not new. It is not order."
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt

Last edited by strongpoint; 12-01-2012 at 11:43 PM..
Reply With Quote