View Single Post
Old 11-18-2012, 7:55 AM
LMTluvr's Avatar
LMTluvr LMTluvr is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Land of the free. NV.
Posts: 1,350
iTrader: 7 / 100%

Originally Posted by Merc1138 View Post
Re-read the post from the guy I called an anti.

If that's how you want to run your school, fine. However requiring people to cough up the cash for background checks just to take a class(someone's going to have to pay for it) would just further disenfranchise people as an "extra" thing to do that's really irrelevant. Who would enforce a requirement that all firearm training requires that? The state? Feds? Yeah, that's an anti-2a attitude. Might as well ask for FOID cards like Illinois or some nonsense. Making it even more difficult for regular citizens to get any sort of firearm training is most certainly anti-2a.
I'm not talking about anything to do with government intervention. The last thing I want is any MORE .gov intervention when it comes to firearms and or training. I was speaking theoretically in a privately owned school setting.
But I do see you're point and agree.
Slayer of abalone and lingcod.
Reply With Quote