Originally Posted by scootergmc
And it still has nothing to do with officers purchasing/owning AW's.
What you consider an AW, the rest of America simply calls firearms. LEOSA states that owning it would be fine, as long as the person in possession is covered by LEOSA.... IIRC this is the same type of situation that they tried to hang Drew Peterson on, unsuccessfully. Now, that may not be binding case law or anything, but it is the only case that I am currently aware of.
Unless you want to civilly discuss why I am wrong, which I may be..